Changing indications and antenatal prognostic factors for ex-utero intrapartum treatment procedures

Hugh Porter,Amit Trivedi,Miguel Marquez,Peter Gibson,Sarah J Melov,Umesh Mishra,Pranav Jani,Alan T Cheng,Roshni Nayyar,Thushari I Alahakoon
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.6230
Abstract:Objective: In cases of suspected neonatal airway obstruction, the ex-utero intrapartum treatment (EXIT) procedure is used to secure the airway while a fetus remains on placental circulation. We report indications and outcomes from all EXIT procedures at a tertiary obstetric unit between 1997 and 2020. Method: Retrospective cohort study with data collected from maternal and neonatal medical records. Results: Indications for EXIT procedures were micrognathia (n = 7), lymphatic malformations (n = 5), cervical teratomas (n = 4), goiters (n = 2), and intra-oral epulis (n = 1). Infants with a fetal teratoma were delivered earliest due to 75% presenting with preterm premature rupture of membranes or preterm labor. Low birth weight was found in 75% of these neonates; they did not survive 1 year. Intubation at EXIT occurred for 58% (n = 11) of babies, and six neonates required a tracheostomy. In four cases of fetal micrognathia, the inferior facial angle (IFA) was noted to be <5th centile. All but one micrognathia case had polyhydramnios. Of the total cohort, 75% of neonates were alive at 1 year. Conclusion: Risks for neonatal demise with EXIT include fetal teratoma, low birth weight, and prematurity. Micrognathia has become an increasingly valid indication for the procedure. The combination of polyhydramnios and IFA <5% correlates well with severe airway obstruction and suggests consideration of EXIT.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?