Amperometric micro-immunosensor for the detection of tumor biomarker.

Shradha Prabhulkar,S. Alwarappan,Guodong Liu,Chen-zhong Li

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2009.05.002

2009-08-15

Abstract:

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Healthcare professional and commissioners' perspectives on the factors facilitating and hindering the implementation of digital tools for self-management of long-term conditions within UK healthcare pathways

James P Gavin,Paul Clarkson,Paul E Muckelt,Rachael Eckford,Euan Sadler,Suzanne McDonough,Mary Barker

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0307493

IF: 3.7

2024-08-23

PLoS ONE

Abstract:Physical activity is important in the self-management of long-term conditions (LTCs). However, implementing physical activity into clinical practice is challenging, due to complex barriers including access to programmes, time pressures, and transport costs, for people with comorbidities, managing multiple responsibilities. Various digital tools exist to overcome these barriers and support wide-scale implementation to help people stay physically active. We explored the experiences, needs and preferences of healthcare professionals and commissioners, regarding the use of digital tools to support people with LTCs to self-manage using physical activity. This included barriers and facilitators to implementing digital tools to support people with LTCs in NHS settings. Semi-structured interviews were conducted (April 2021 to January 2022) in Wessex, southern England, UK. Purposive sampling was used to recruit general practitioners and healthcare professionals, and convenience sampling to recruit commissioners (n = 15). Transcripts were coded to develop conceptual themes allowing comparisons between and among perspectives, with the Normalisation Process Theory (NPT)'s four constructs used to aid interpretation. Results showed that most digital tools supporting physical activity for LTCs, are not well implemented clinically. Current digital tools were seen to lack condition-specificity, usability/acceptability evidence-base, and voluntary sector involvement (i.e., NPT: coherence or 'making sense'). Healthcare professionals and commissioners were unlikely to engage with use of digital tools unless they were integrated into health service IT systems and professional networks (i.e., NPT: cognitive participation), or adaptable to the digital literacy levels of service users and staff (i.e., NPT: collective action-needs for implementation). In practice, this meant being technically, easy to use and culturally accessible (i.e., NPT: collective action-promoting healthcare work). COVID-19 changed professional attitudes towards digital tools, in that they saw them being viable, feasible and critical options in a way they had not done before the pandemic. Implementation was also influenced by endorsement and trustworthiness enhancing the perception of them as secure and evidence-based (i.e., NPT: reflective monitoring). Our findings highlight that consideration must be given to ensuring that digital tools are accessible to both healthcare professionals and patients, have usability/acceptability, and are adaptable to specific LTCs. To promote clinical engagement, digital tools must be evidence-based, endorsed by professional networks, and integrated into existing health systems. Digital literacy of patients and professionals is also crucial for cross-service implementation.
[The size of nanoparticles after incorporation into gastroresistant spheroids].

Duvivier,C. Grandfils,F. Leonard,B. Evrard,L. Delattre

Abstract:Nanoparticles can be used as an attractive carrier for the controlled delivery of drugs by the oral route. This nanoparticular delivery system can protect an active ingredient from enzymatic degradations and enhance its absorption from the intestinal mucosa. We studied the development of a gastroresistant dosage form for the oral administration of nanoparticles. Fast disintegrating pellets were used for the administration of nanoparticles and for their transit to the site of absorption. A gastroresistant film was applied onto the pellets to protect the nanoparticles and/ or the active substance from the acid gastric environment. The integrity of the nanoparticle size was assessed after two critical manufacturing steps: the extrusion/spheronisation process and the coating process. The determination of the nanoparticles size distribution was performed by photon correlation spectroscopy (PCS). The comparison of the PCS results between the original nanoparticles and the nanoparticles incorporated in the pellets shows a very low aggregation. Moreover the coating process was not a critical step since it was not responsible for an additional agglomeration of the nanoparticles. In conclusion, our manufacturing process allows the redispersion of the nanoparticles with a little change of the size distribution. In a next study we well try to quantify the release of the nanoparticles from the pellets.
Patient experience and barriers of using a mHealth exercise app in musculoskeletal (MSK) Physiotherapy

Jack Grodon,Christopher Tack,Laura Eccott,Mindy C Cairns

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pdig.0000626

2024-10-07

Abstract:Digital transformation has led to an abundance of digital health technologies (DHTs) readily available for Physiotherapists. In July 2020, the Physiotherapy department at a London NHS Trust implemented a mobile health (mHealth) exercise application (app), Physitrack. This service evaluation aims to evaluate patient experience and identify any barriers to using Physitrack/PhysiApp in musculoskeletal (MSK) Physiotherapy. An online experience survey was sent to 10,287 MSK Physiotherapy patients who had appointments between January 17th and April 9th 2022.The survey received 1,447 responses (response rate: 14.07%), with 954 (65.93%) respondents previously provided PhysiApp as part of their Physiotherapy management. Most participants used PhysiApp (83.06%), found it easy to use (82.20%) and had positive perceptions on how it added value to their Physiotherapy treatment through its functionality. However, negative impacts on patient-centred care and practical exercise demonstration were apparent in the qualitative results. Key barriers to use included suboptimal explanation, digital exclusion, registration/ login issues and opinion that PhysiApp was superfluous to Physiotherapy treatment. These differed to the main barriers of why participants stopped using/ used PhysiApp less: if they were confident exercising without it, their condition improved/ resolved, loss of motivation, their exercise programme ended or if they found their exercise programme was unsuitable. Despite multiple interdependent factors influencing patient experience and barriers of using PhysiApp, the survey results revealed the significant influence that is exerted by MSK Physiotherapists. The patient-physiotherapist interaction can positively or negatively impact upon many barriers of use and the subsequent potential added value of PhysiApp to MSK Physiotherapy treatment. Future research should focus on those at most risk of digital exclusion and health inequalities, exploring their barriers to using mHealth apps and other DHTs.
Digital Lifestyle Interventions for Young People With Mental Illness: A Qualitative Study Among Mental Health Care Professionals

Chelsea Sawyer,Rebekah Carney,Lamiece Hassan,Sandra Bucci,John Sainsbury,Karina Lovell,John Torous,Joseph Firth

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/53406

2024-06-05

Abstract:Background: Given the physical health disparities associated with mental illness, targeted lifestyle interventions are required to reduce the risk of cardiometabolic disease. Integrating physical health early in mental health treatment among young people is essential for preventing physical comorbidities, reducing health disparities, managing medication side effects, and improving overall health outcomes. Digital technology is increasingly used to promote fitness, lifestyle, and physical health among the general population. However, using these interventions to promote physical health within mental health care requires a nuanced understanding of the factors that affect their adoption and implementation. Objective: Using a qualitative design, we explored the attitudes of mental health care professionals (MHCPs) toward digital technologies for physical health with the goal of illuminating the opportunities, development, and implementation of the effective use of digital tools for promoting healthier lifestyles in mental health care. Methods: Semistructured interviews were conducted with MHCPs (N=13) using reflexive thematic analysis to explore their experiences and perspectives on using digital health to promote physical health in youth mental health care settings. Results: Three overarching themes from the qualitative analysis are reported: (1) motivation will affect implementation, (2) patients' readiness and capability, and (3) reallocation of staff roles and responsibilities. The subthemes within, and supporting quotes, are described. Conclusions: The use of digital means presents many opportunities for improving the provision of physical health interventions in mental health care settings. However, given the limited experience of many MHCPs with these technologies, formal training and additional support may improve the likelihood of implementation. Factors such as patient symptomatology, safety, and access to technology, as well as the readiness, acceptability, and capability of both MHCPs and patients to engage with digital tools, must also be considered. In addition, the potential benefits of data integration must be carefully weighed against the associated risks.
Barriers and facilitators to physical activity and further digital exercise intervention among inactive British adolescents in secondary schools: a qualitative study with physical education teachers

Richard Moore,Lee Edmondson,Maxine Gregory,Kerry Griffiths,Elizabeth Freeman

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1193669

IF: 5.2

2023-06-02

Frontiers in Public Health

Abstract:Background Previous studies indicated that physical education programs in schools were unsuccessful to ameliorate physical activity (PA) behaviors among adolescents. This study investigated PE teachers’ perceptions of barriers and facilitators to PA and further digital exercise interventions among inactive British adolescents in secondary schools based on the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation, and Behavior (COM-B) model, the Behavior Change Wheel (BCW), and Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF). Method A qualitative study was conducted among 156 PE teachers in England. deductive thematic analysis approach was applied to analyze data. Results A comprehensive perception of PE teachers revealed 21 barriers to PA among inactive adolescents in secondary schools. The study findings show that barriers exist across all categories of the COM-B model in physical opportunity (7), reflective motivation (5), social opportunity (4), psychological capability (4) and physical capability (1). The majority of these barriers were reported in previous studies as being barriers to PA from the perspective of children and adolescents. This shows that the findings are consistent with the views of children and adolescents that participated in these studies. Particular salient barriers for inactive adolescents were reported and greater insight into their experiences was highlighted. The study reported the main sources of behavior, intervention functions, policy functions, and behavior change tools that can be used for future behavior change interventions to support inactive adolescents. Conclusion The study recommends using its findings to design interventions for inactive adolescents to achieve recommended levels of physical activity (PA). The study’s comprehensive approach and evidence-based solutions provide extensive reference points for future intervention design, informing policy and contributing to enhancing support for inactive adolescents. Further development of digital exercise interventions, including conversational artificial intelligence (AI), is suggested to engage adolescents at scale and provide personalized support to overcome multiple barriers to PA.

public, environmental & occupational health
Barriers to and Facilitators of the Implementation of Digital Mental Health Interventions as Perceived by Primary Care Decision Makers: Content Analysis of Structured Open-Ended Survey Data

Anders Brantnell,Serdar Temiz,Enrico Baraldi,Joanne Woodford,Louise von Essen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/44688

2023-06-28

JMIR Human Factors

Abstract:Background: Digital mental health represents a way to increase access to evidence-based psychological support. However, the implementation of digital mental health in routine health care practice is limited, with few studies focusing on implementation. Accordingly, there is a need to better understand the barriers to and facilitators of implementing digital mental health. Existing studies have mainly focused on the viewpoints of patients and health professionals. Currently, there are few studies about barriers and facilitators from the perspective of primary care decision makers, that is, the persons responsible for deciding whether a given digital mental health intervention should be implemented in a primary care organization. Objective: The objectives were to identify and describe barriers to and facilitators of the implementation of digital mental health as perceived by primary care decision makers, evaluate the relative importance of different barriers and facilitators, and compare barriers and facilitators reported by primary care decision makers who have versus have not implemented digital mental health interventions. Methods: A web-based self-report survey was conducted with primary care decision makers responsible for the implementation of digital mental health in primary care organizations in Sweden. Answers to 2 open-ended questions about barriers and facilitators were analyzed through summative and deductive content analysis. Results: The survey was completed by 284 primary care decision makers—59 (20.8%) decision makers representing implementers (ie, organizations that offered digital mental health interventions) and 225 (79.2%) respondents representing nonimplementers (ie, organizations that did not offer digital mental health interventions). Overall, 90% (53/59) of the implementers and 98.7% (222/225) of the nonimplementers identified barriers, and 97% (57/59) of the implementers and 93.3% (210/225) of the nonimplementers identified facilitators. Altogether, 29 barriers and 20 facilitators of implementation were identified related to guidelines; patients; health professionals; incentives and resources; capacity for organizational change; and social, political, and legal factors. The most prevalent barriers were related to incentives and resources, whereas the most prevalent facilitators were related to the capacity for organizational change. Conclusions: A number of barriers and facilitators were identified that could influence the implementation of digital mental health from the perspective of primary care decision makers. Implementers and nonimplementers identified many common barriers and facilitators, but they differ in terms of certain barriers and facilitators. Common and differing barriers and facilitators identified by implementers and nonimplementers may be important to address when planning for the implementation of digital mental health interventions. For instance, financial incentives and disincentives (eg, increased costs) are the most frequently mentioned barrier and facilitator, respectively, by nonimplementers, but not by implementers. One way to facilitate implementation could be to provide more information to nonimplementers about the actual costs related to the implementation of digital mental health.
Understanding inherent influencing factors to digital health adoption in general practices through a mixed-methods analysis

Lisa Weik,Leonard Fehring,Achim Mortsiefer,Sven Meister

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-024-01049-0

IF: 15.2

2024-02-28

npj Digital Medicine

Abstract:Extensive research has shown the potential value of digital health solutions and highlighted the importance of clinicians' adoption. As general practitioners (GPs) are patients' first point of contact, understanding influencing factors to their digital health adoption is especially important to derive personalized practical recommendations. Using a mixed-methods approach, this study broadly identifies adoption barriers and potential improvement strategies in general practices, including the impact of GPs' inherent characteristics – especially their personality – on digital health adoption. Results of our online survey with 216 GPs reveal moderate overall barriers on a 5-point Likert-type scale, with required workflow adjustments (M = 4.13, SD = 0.93), inadequate reimbursement (M = 4.02, SD = 1.02), and high training effort (M = 3.87, SD = 1.01) as substantial barriers. Improvement strategies are considered important overall, with respondents especially wishing for improved interoperability (M = 4.38, SD = 0.81), continued technical support (M = 4.33, SD = 0.91), and improved usability (M = 4.20, SD = 0.88). In our regression model, practice-related characteristics, the expected future digital health usage, GPs' digital affinity, several personality traits, and digital maturity are significant predictors of the perceived strength of barriers. For the perceived importance of improvement strategies, only demographics and usage-related variables are significant predictors. This study provides strong evidence for the impact of GPs' inherent characteristics on barriers and improvement strategies. Our findings highlight the need for comprehensive approaches integrating personal and emotional elements to make digitization in practices more engaging, tangible, and applicable.

health care sciences & services,medical informatics
Determinants of physical activity promotion in primary care from the patient perspective of people at risk of or living with chronic disease: a COM-B analysis

Aisling McGrath,Barry Lambe,Evan Matthews,Karolyn McDonnell,Michael Harrison,Bróna Kehoe

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-024-02440-2

2024-05-28

Abstract:Background: Chronic disease (CD) accounts for more than half of the overall global disease burden and physical activity (PA) is an established evidence-based strategy for the prevention and management of CD. Global policy emphasises the value of embedding PA into primary healthcare, highlighting the positive effects on PA behaviour. However, there is limited implementation of PA protocols in primary care, and research is needed to guide its integration into routine practice. The voice of the patient is underrepresented in the literature, resulting in the absence of critical insights into determinants of PA promotion in primary care. The purpose of the research was to identify the perspectives of people at risk of or living with CD on the determinants of PA promotion in primary care and to map these determinants across the six COM-B constructs. Methods: Semi-structured interviews (n = 22), guided by the COM-B model were conducted with people aged 35-60 years, at risk of or living with CD and not meeting the PA guidelines. A hybrid analytic approach of thematic inductive and deductive analysis was applied to the participant transcripts guided by a COM-B informed coding framework. Results: In total, 37 determinants across constructs related to capability, opportunity and motivation were prominent, examples include; physical capability constraints, the conflation of exercise with weight management, credibility of the health services in PA advice, communication styles in PA promotion, expectations of tailored support for PA, social support, accessibility, and integration of PA into routine habits. Conclusion: Exploring the determinants of PA promotion through the lens of the COM-B model facilitated a systematic approach to understanding the primary care user perspective of the healthcare professional (HCP) broaching the topic of PA. Findings emphasise the value of HCPs being supported to broach the issue of PA in a therapeutic and patient-centred manner using diverse and flexible approaches, while highlighting the importance of tailored, accessible PA opportunities that build self-efficacy and foster social support. The research provides valuable learnings to support PA promotion and the development of strategies in primary care through encompassing the perspective of those living with or at risk of CD.
Elan: ziconotide review focused on off-label uses.

A. Narayana

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/104990910502200602

2005-11-01

Abstract:We read with interest Dr. Eric Prommer’s review of ziconotide in the September/October 2005 issue.1 The majority of references and discussion for this review focused on off-label uses and off-label titration schemes for ziconotide therapy.2,3 The purpose of this letter is to highlight the recommended titration schedule by summarizing the key findings from a recent study.4 During the American Association of Pain Management (AAPM) meeting in 2005, our most recent pivotal study utilizing a slow titration regimen (Study 301) was presented by Dr. Lynn Webster. Study 301 forms the basis of the dosage and administration section of the US package insert. The slow-titration study randomized 220 patients to ziconotide or placebo. This study examined patients who had failed all other pain-therapy options. The mean percentage change in Visual Analog Scale of Pain Intensity (VASPI) score from baseline to end of the initial titration was significantly higher (p = 0.036) for patients in the ziconotide group (14.7 percent) than in the placebo group (7.2 percent). Secondary outcome measures supported the clinical significance of the primary efficacy outcome measure. Statistically significant differences on the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) scale were found: 28.4 percent of patients in the ziconotide group compared with 12.1 percent of patients in the placebo group reported “a lot” or “complete satisfaction” with therapy. Ziconotide therapy was well-tolerated in this study. The discontinuation rate in Study 301 due to adverse events (4.5 percent for ziconotide patients and 4.6 percent for placebo patients) as well as the incidence of serious adverse events (11.6 percent and 9.3 percent, respectively) were not significantly different between ziconotide and placebo. The 11.6 percent serious adverse event rate in the ziconotide arm at three weeks in Study 301 compares with a 30.6 percent serious adverse event rate at the end of initial titration (5 to 6 days) in the ziconotide arm of the Staats study.3 Thus, after taking into consideration the different patient exposures, the incidence of serious adverse events was more than three times greater in the Staats study than that in the slow-titration study. The results of Study 301 demonstrate that there is a much-improved tolerability and safety profile with a slower administration of ziconotide therapy. Over 1,200 patients have been treated with ziconotide in the clinical studies leading to approval.5 First, we have seen no evidence of addiction to ziconotide therapy. Next, no evidence of tolerance development has been seen with ziconotide therapy in preclinical6 and clinical7,8 studies. Nor has evidence of physical dependence or withdrawal been seen with discontinuation of ziconotide.5 In clinical trials, ziconotide did not suppress respiratory function. In contrast, opiates are known to cause lifethreatening respiratory depression. Overdoses of ziconotide do not appear to be lethal. In contrast, overdosage of morphine can be lethal. There has been no evidence of granuloma formation in any of our ziconotide studies. In contrast, high concentrations of morphine can cause granulomas leading to irreversible neurologic deficits, including paralysis.9 In summary, intrathecal ziconotide is the first treatment for patients with severe chronic pain in 20 years supported by double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical studies. I encourage your readers to contact me if they have any questions. Sincerely,
Understanding exercise referrals in primary care: a qualitative study of General Practitioners and Physiotherapists

Rebekah Dunphy,David N Blane

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physio.2024.04.348

IF: 3.704

2024-04-28

Physiotherapy

Abstract:Background Physical inactivity is estimated to cost the UK National Health Service over £7.4 billion per year. Healthcare practitioners have a key role in supporting increases in physical activity (PA) levels, including referring to exercise referral schemes. To date, there has been little research into practitioner perspectives on referrals to exercise schemes. Objectives To explore the views and experiences of General Practitioners (GPs) and physiotherapists in relation to factors which influence referral and adherence to exercise referral schemes. Design setting & participants Qualitative study of primary care-based practitioners in Glasgow, UK. Methods Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 14 practitioners (seven GPs and seven physiotherapists). Interviews were recorded and analysed thematically. Results Four themes are presented. Firstly, all people, including healthcare practitioners, bring inherent biases which are influenced by their background, experiences and worldviews to a consultation which impact their approach to PA promotion. Secondly, clinical time pressures are a major barrier to effective PA promotion. Thirdly, patient-led, compassionate care which seeks to fully understand a patient is the most vital component of behaviour change, with suggestions that promoting peer support and the use of personal anecdotes to normalise vulnerabilities might be helpful. Lastly, providing ongoing support for change was felt to be beneficial to PA promotion. This is often accessed through exercise referral schemes and improved by better collaboration between exercise providers and referring practitioners. Conclusion Practitioners believed exercise referrals could be improved with more targeted training in behaviour change facilitation, support for multidisciplinary working, and enhanced communication between the programmes and referrers. Additionally, supporting behaviour change requires time for compassionate care and fully understanding patients' motivations and beliefs. Lack of time was felt to be the greatest current barrier to effective PA promotion. Contribution of the paper • Previous physical activity promotion research has focussed on overcoming barriers to physical activity. • Few studies have considered the effect of the therapeutic interaction on successful exercise referrals. • In this qualitative study, primary care-based practitioners (GPs and physiotherapists) reported inherent biases which affected referrals, as well as time pressures. • Targeted training, support for multidisciplinary working, and enhanced communication between the programmes and referrers, would improve referrals.

rehabilitation
P071 Exploring experiences and preferences of people with rheumatoid arthritis for digital interventions to promote physical activity (PA)

Charlotte Gerlis,Alice Berry,Serena Halls,Michael Loizou,Caroline Swales,Fiona Cramp

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/keae163.112

2024-04-01

Rheumatology

Abstract:Abstract Background/Aims Physical activity (PA) is effective for managing symptoms of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) but people with RA are less active than their healthy counterparts. A digital intervention (DI) to promote PA, is a potential solution. There is a paucity of literature available exploring the requirements of people with RA for a digital intervention. It is important to explore experiences and preferences before developing such an intervention. Aims: 1. Identify digital technology currently used by people with RA to support PA. 2. Understand the preferences and acceptability of people with RA for potential DI delivery. Methods A survey was developed to address these aims. A patient research partner (CS) and ‘think aloud’ pilots contributed to development. The survey was circulated once to members of the National Rheumatoid Arthritis Society in November 2022. This study was approved by the National Health Service Research Ethics Committee (reference 22/NE/0158). Results 1178 people consented to take part (86% female, 64% aged 55-74). The majority used digital technology every day (97%). 84% anticipated using a potential DI to support PA, most preferably every day (48%) or 2-3 times a week (14%). 16% never anticipated using DI to support PA. 34% reported currently using technology to support PA; mostly an app without healthcare professional (HCP) interaction (42%) or internet videos (40%). A further 27% had tried technology to support PA but discontinued, and 39% had never tried. An app was the most preferable delivery platform (56%), followed by a website (43%) or internet videos (28%). 51% would prefer to be offered or signposted to digital technology to support PA by an exercise professional with specific rheumatology training or a healthcare professional (22%). Potential DI delivery methods were rated on a Likert scale of 1-5 for general acceptability, a score of five indicating highest acceptability: automated response mean[SD] 3.6[0.9], ad-hoc HCP interaction 3.5[0.8] pre-arranged HCP interaction 3.4[1] and no interaction 3.1[1]. Conclusion People with RA are using digital technology regularly and many anticipated using a DI to support PA. Despite this, only a third are currently using digital technology to support PA. An app or website platform was the preferred delivery method suggesting that an internet delivered intervention is acceptable. Acceptability ratings of DI delivery methods were similar. Further sub-group analysis and exploration of free text responses is planned to inform tailoring of DI delivery. Disclosure C. Gerlis: None. A. Berry: None. S. Halls: None. M. Loizou: None. C. Swales: None. F. Cramp: None.

rheumatology
“My Patients Asked Me If I Owned a Fruit Stand in Town or Something.” Barriers and Facilitators of Personalized Dietary Advice Implemented in a Primary Care Setting

Heather L. Rogers,Silvia Núñez Fernández,Susana Pablo Hernando,Alvaro Sanchez,Carlos Martos,Maribel Moreno,Gonzalo Grandes

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm11080747

IF: 3.5083

2021-07-29

Journal of Personalized Medicine

Abstract:Primary care is especially well positioned to address prevention of non-communicable diseases. However, implementation of health promotion activities such as personalized dietary advice is challenging. The study aim was to understand barriers and facilitators of the personalized dietary advice component of a lifestyle intervention in primary care, as perceived by health center professionals and program participants. Thirteen focus groups were conducted with 49 professionals and 47 participants. Audio recordings were transcribed. Professional group text was coded using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). Participant group text was coded via an inductive approach with thematic analysis. Across most CFIR domains, both barriers and facilitators were equally present, except for ‘characteristics of individuals’, which were primarily facilitators. Intervention characteristics was the most important domain, with barriers in design and packaging (e.g., the ICT tool) and complexity. Facilitators included high evidence strength and quality, adaptability, and relative advantage. Participants described the importance of more personalized advice, the value of follow-up with feedback, and the need to see outcomes. Both professionals and patients stated that primary care was the place for personalized dietary advice intervention, but that lack of time, workload, and training were barriers to effective implementation. Implementation strategies targeting these modifiable barriers could potentially increase intervention adoption and intervention effectiveness.

medicine, general & internal,health care sciences & services
A Clinician and Electronic Health Record Wearable Device Intervention to Increase Physical Activity in Patients With Obesity: Formative Qualitative Study

Varun Ayyaswami,Jeevarathna Subramanian,Jenna Nickerson,Stephen Erban,Nina Rosano,David D McManus,Ben S Gerber,Jamie M Faro

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/56962

2024-09-02

Abstract:Background: The number of individuals using digital health devices has grown in recent years. A higher rate of use in patients suggests that primary care providers (PCPs) may be able to leverage these tools to effectively guide and monitor physical activity (PA) for their patients. Despite evidence that remote patient monitoring (RPM) may enhance obesity interventions, few primary care practices have implemented programs that use commercial digital health tools to promote health or reduce complications of the disease. Objective: This formative study aimed to assess the perceptions, needs, and challenges of implementation of an electronic health record (EHR)-integrated RPM program using wearable devices to promote patient PA at a large urban primary care practice to prepare for future intervention. Methods: Our team identified existing workflows to upload wearable data to the EHR (Epic Systems), which included direct Fitbit (Google) integration that allowed for patient PA data to be uploaded to the EHR. We identified pictorial job aids describing the clinical workflow to PCPs. We then performed semistructured interviews with PCPs (n=10) and patients with obesity (n=8) at a large urban primary care clinic regarding their preferences and barriers to the program. We presented previously developed pictorial aids with instructions for (1) providers to complete an order set, set step-count goals, and receive feedback and (2) patients to set up their wearable devices and connect them to their patient portal account. We used rapid qualitative analysis during and after the interviews to code and develop key themes for both patients and providers that addressed our research objective. Results: In total, 3 themes were identified from provider interviews: (1) providers' knowledge of PA prescription is focused on general guidelines with limited knowledge on how to tailor guidance to patients, (2) providers were open to receiving PA data but were worried about being overburdened by additional patient data, and (3) providers were concerned about patients being able to equitably access and participate in digital health interventions. In addition, 3 themes were also identified from patient interviews: (1) patients received limited or nonspecific guidance regarding PA from providers and other resources, (2) patients want to share exercise metrics with the health care team and receive tailored PA guidance at regular intervals, and (3) patients need written resources to support setting up an RPM program with access to live assistance on an as-needed basis. Conclusions: Implementation of an EHR-based RPM program and associated workflow is acceptable to PCPs and patients but will require attention to provider concerns of added burdensome patient data and patient concerns of receiving tailored PA guidance. Our ongoing work will pilot the RPM program and evaluate feasibility and acceptability within a primary care setting.
Dynamics of Perceived Barriers to Change Physical Activity and Eating Habits in Adults Before and During a Lifestyle Intervention in a Primary Care Setting: A Mixed Methods Approach

Fawzi Kadi,Andreas Nilsson

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/21501319241273321

Abstract:Background: There is scarcity of data exploring the dynamics of barriers to changing physical activity (PA) and eating habits during a lifestyle intervention in a primary care setting. The aim of the present study was to investigate barriers to lifestyle change before and during a primary care lifestyle intervention in adults with different sociodemographic backgrounds. Methods: Barriers to healthy eating and PA were assessed in 114 adults (age = 55 ± 9 years) using a questionnaire before inclusion in the intervention. During the lifestyle intervention, factors perceived as obstacles to reach goals for PA and healthy eating habits were collected using focus group interviews in a sub-sample of 25 adults and analyzed using thematic analysis. Results: At least 1 barrier to changing eating and PA habits was reported in 65% and 67% of the population, respectively, without differences due to sex, place of birth, and educational level. Before entering the lifestyle intervention, intrapersonal factors including lack of willpower and lack of enjoyment were the dominant barriers to PA and healthy eating, irrespective of place of birth, sex, and education level. In contrast, environmental factors such as lack of support from family and work-related constraints emerged as important barriers to overcome during the action phase of the lifestyle intervention. Conclusions: The present study highlights the dynamics of barriers to changing PA and eating habits in a primary care lifestyle intervention, emphasizing the need for barrier assessment during the different phases of an intervention to tailor support activities for successful lifestyle behavioral change.
Evaluating the Digital Health Experience for Patients in Primary Care: Mixed Methods Study

Melinda Ada Choy,Kathleen O'Brien,Katelyn Barnes,Elizabeth Ann Sturgiss,Elizabeth Rieger,Kirsty Douglas

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/50410

IF: 7.076

2024-04-11

Journal of Medical Internet Research

Abstract:Background The digital health divide for socioeconomic disadvantage describes a pattern in which patients considered socioeconomically disadvantaged, who are already marginalized through reduced access to face-to-face health care, are additionally hindered through less access to patient-initiated digital health. A comprehensive understanding of how patients with socioeconomic disadvantage access and experience digital health is essential for improving the digital health divide. Primary care patients, especially those with chronic disease, have experience of the stages of initial help seeking and self-management of their health, which renders them a key demographic for research on patient-initiated digital health access. Objective This study aims to provide comprehensive primary mixed methods data on the patient experience of barriers to digital health access, with a focus on the digital health divide. Methods We applied an exploratory mixed methods design to ensure that our survey was primarily shaped by the experiences of our interviewees. First, we qualitatively explored the experience of digital health for 19 patients with socioeconomic disadvantage and chronic disease and second, we quantitatively measured some of these findings by designing and administering a survey to 487 Australian general practice patients from 24 general practices. Results In our qualitative first phase, the key barriers found to accessing digital health included (1) strong patient preference for human-based health services; (2) low trust in digital health services; (3) high financial costs of necessary tools, maintenance, and repairs; (4) poor publicly available internet access options; (5) reduced capacity to engage due to increased life pressures; and (6) low self-efficacy and confidence in using digital health. In our quantitative second phase, 31% (151/487) of the survey participants were found to have never used a form of digital health, while 10.7% (52/487) were low- to medium-frequency users and 48.5% (236/487) were high-frequency users. High-frequency users were more likely to be interested in digital health and had higher self-efficacy. Low-frequency users were more likely to report difficulty affording the financial costs needed for digital access. Conclusions While general digital interest, financial cost, and digital health literacy and empowerment are clear factors in digital health access in a broad primary care population, the digital health divide is also facilitated in part by a stepped series of complex and cumulative barriers. Genuinely improving digital health access for 1 cohort or even 1 person requires a series of multiple different interventions tailored to specific sequential barriers. Within primary care, patient-centered care that continues to recognize the complex individual needs of, and barriers facing, each patient should be part of addressing the digital health divide.

health care sciences & services,medical informatics
The time course of aconitate formation from isocitrate in H2O and D2O.

J. F. Thomson,S. Nance

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-9861(69)90509-8

IF: 4.114

Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics

Abstract:
Developing and Evaluating Digital Interventions to Promote Behavior Change in Health and Health Care: Recommendations Resulting From an International Workshop

Susan Michie,Lucy Yardley,Robert West,Kevin Patrick,Felix Greaves

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.7126

IF: 7.076

2017-06-29

Journal of Medical Internet Research

Abstract:Devices and programs using digital technology to foster or support behavior change (digital interventions) are increasingly ubiquitous, being adopted for use in patient diagnosis and treatment, self-management of chronic diseases, and in primary prevention. They have been heralded as potentially revolutionizing the ways in which individuals can monitor and improve their health behaviors and health care by improving outcomes, reducing costs, and improving the patient experience. However, we are still mainly in the age of promise rather than delivery. Developing and evaluating these digital interventions presents new challenges and new versions of old challenges that require use of improved and perhaps entirely new methods for research and evaluation. This article discusses these challenges and provides recommendations aimed at accelerating the rate of progress in digital behavior intervention research and practice. Areas addressed include intervention development in a rapidly changing technological landscape, promoting user engagement, advancing the underpinning science and theory, evaluating effectiveness and cost-effectiveness, and addressing issues of regulatory, ethical, and information governance. This article is the result of a two-day international workshop on how to create, evaluate, and implement effective digital interventions in relation to health behaviors. It was held in London in September 2015 and was supported by the United Kingdom's Medical Research Council (MRC), the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR), the Methodology Research Programme (PI Susan Michie), and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation of the United States (PI Kevin Patrick). Important recommendations to manage the rapid pace of change include considering using emerging techniques from data science, machine learning, and Bayesian approaches and learning from other disciplines including computer science and engineering. With regard to assessing and promoting engagement, a key conclusion was that sustained engagement is not always required and that for each intervention it is useful to establish what constitutes "effective engagement," that is, sufficient engagement to achieve the intended outcomes. The potential of digital interventions for testing and advancing theories of behavior change by generating ecologically valid, real-time objective data was recognized. Evaluations should include all phases of the development cycle, designed for generalizability, and consider new experimental designs to make the best use of rich data streams. Future health economics analyses need to recognize and model the complex and potentially far-reaching costs and benefits of digital interventions. In terms of governance, developers of digital behavior interventions should comply with existing regulatory frameworks, but with consideration for emerging standards around information governance, ethics, and interoperability.

health care sciences & services,medical informatics
Current experience and future potential of facilitating access to digital NHS primary care services in England: the Di-Facto mixed-methods study

Gary Abel,Helen Atherton,Jon Sussex,Nurunnahar Akter,Abodunrin Q Aminu,Wiktoria Bak,Carol Bryce,Christopher E Clark,Emma Cockcroft,Hamish Evans,Evangelos Gkousis,Georgia Jenkins,Caroline Jenkinson,Nada Khan,Jeffrey Lambert,Brandi Leach,Christine Marriott,Jennifer Newbould,Sarah Parkinson,Jo Parsons,Emma Pitchforth,Laura Sheard,Stephanie Stockwell,Chloe Thomas,Bethan Treadgold,Rachel Winder,John L Campbell

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3310/JKYT5803

Abstract:Background: Current National Health Service policy in England encourages enhanced digital access in primary care service provision. In this study, we investigate 'digital facilitation' - that range of processes, procedures and personnel which seeks to support National Health Service primary care patients in their uptake and use of online services. Objectives: Identify, characterise and explore the potential benefits and challenges associated with different models of digital facilitation currently in use in general practice which are aimed at improving patient access to online services in general practice in England. Use the resulting intelligence to design a framework for future evaluations of the effectiveness and cost effectiveness of such interventions. Explore how patients with mental health conditions experience digital facilitation and gauge their need for this support. Design: Observational mixed-methods study (literature review, surveys, ethnographic observation and interviews); formal synthesis of findings. Setting: General practice in four regions of England. Participants: Practice survey: 156 staff. Patient survey: 3051 patients. Mental health survey: 756 patients. General practitioner patient survey: 3 million responders. Ethnographic case-studies: 8 practices; interviews with 36 staff, 33 patients and 10 patients with a mental health condition. Stakeholder interviews: 19 participants. Intervention: Digital facilitation as undertaken in general practice. Main outcome measures: Patient and practice staff reported use of, and views of, digital facilitation. Data sources: Surveys, qualitative research; national General Practitioner Patient Survey (2019-22). Review methods: Scoping-review methodology applied to academic and grey literature published 2015-20. Results: While we did find examples of digital facilitation in routine practice, these often involved using passive or reactive modes of support. The context of COVID, and the necessary acceleration (at that time) of the move to a digital-first model of primary care, shaped the way digital facilitation was delivered. There was lack of clarity over where the responsibility for facilitation efforts lay; it was viewed as the responsibility of 'others'. Patients living with mental health conditions had similar needs and experiences regarding digital facilitation to other patients. Limitations: The context of the COVID pandemic placed limitations on the project. Fewer practices responded to the practice survey than anticipated; reconfiguration of general practices to support COVID measures was a key consideration during non-participant observation with social distancing and other measures still in place during fieldwork. Conclusions: Digital facilitation, while not a widely recognised concept, is important in supporting the move to a National Health Service with enhanced digital opportunities and enhanced digital access. General practice staff are allocating resources to provide such efforts in general practices in England. The establishment of clear lines of responsibility, the development of digital tools and platforms that work for patients and practice staff, and investment in staff time and training are needed if digital facilitation is to support the intended digital revolution. Future work: We did not find one single dominant or preferred model of digital facilitation which might reasonably be considered to form the basis of an intervention to be tested. Rather, there is a need to co-develop such an intervention with patients, general practice staff and relevant policy experts. We outline a framework for a future evaluation of such an intervention. Study registration: This study is registered as ResearchRegistry6523 (www.researchregistry.com/browse-the-registry#home/?view_2_search=Di-Facto&view_2_page=1) and PROSPERO CRD42020189019 (www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=189019). Funding: This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health and Social Care Delivery Research programme (NIHR award ref: NIHR128268) and is published in full in Health and Social Care Delivery Research; Vol. 12, No. 32. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.
Barriers and facilitators to clinical behaviour change by primary care practitioners: a theory-informed systematic review of reviews using the Theoretical Domains Framework and Behaviour Change Wheel

Melissa Mather,Luisa M Pettigrew,Stefan Navaratnam

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-022-02030-2

2022-08-30

Abstract:Background: Understanding the barriers and facilitators to behaviour change by primary care practitioners (PCPs) is vital to inform the design and implementation of successful Behaviour Change Interventions (BCIs), embed evidence-based medicine into routine clinical practice, and improve quality of care and population health outcomes. Methods: A theory-led systematic review of reviews examining barriers and facilitators to clinical behaviour change by PCPs in high-income primary care contexts using PRISMA. Embase, MEDLINE, PsychInfo, HMIC and Cochrane Library were searched. Content and framework analysis was used to map reported barriers and facilitators to the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) and describe emergent themes. Intervention functions and policy categories to change behaviour associated with these domains were identified using the COM-B Model and Behaviour Change Wheel (BCW). Results: Four thousand three hundred eighty-eight reviews were identified. Nineteen were included. The average quality score was 7.5/11. Reviews infrequently used theory to structure their methods or interpret their findings. Barriers and facilitators most frequently identified as important were principally related to 'Knowledge', 'Environmental context and resources' and 'Social influences' TDF domains. These fall under the 'Capability' and 'Opportunity' domains of COM-B, and are linked with interventions related to education, training, restriction, environmental restructuring and enablement. From this, three key areas for policy change include guidelines, regulation and legislation. Factors least frequently identified as important were related to 'Motivation' and other psychological aspects of 'Capability' of COM-B. Based on this, BCW intervention functions of persuasion, incentivisation, coercion and modelling may be perceived as less relevant by PCPs to change behaviour. Conclusions: PCPs commonly perceive barriers and facilitators to behaviour change related to the 'Capability' and 'Opportunity' domains of COM-B. PCPs may lack insight into the role that 'Motivation' and aspects of psychological 'Capability' have in behaviour change and/or that research methods have been inadequate to capture their function. Future research should apply theory-based frameworks and appropriate design methods to explore these factors. With no 'one size fits all' intervention, these findings provide general, transferable insights into how to approach changing clinical behaviour by PCPs, based on their own views on the barriers and facilitators to behaviour change. Systematic review registration: A protocol was submitted to the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine via the Ethics and CARE form submission on 16.4.2020, ref number 21478 (available on request). The project was not registered on PROSPERO.
The effectiveness of digital interventions for increasing physical activity in individuals of low socioeconomic status: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Max J Western,Miranda E G Armstrong,Ishrat Islam,Kelly Morgan,Una F Jones,Mark J Kelson

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-021-01218-4

2021-11-09

Abstract:Background: Digital technologies such as wearables, websites and mobile applications are increasingly used in interventions targeting physical activity (PA). Increasing access to such technologies makes an attractive prospect for helping individuals of low socioeconomic status (SES) in becoming more active and healthier. However, little is known about their effectiveness in such populations. The aim of this systematic review was to explore whether digital interventions were effective in promoting PA in low SES populations, whether interventions are of equal benefit to higher SES individuals and whether the number or type of behaviour change techniques (BCTs) used in digital PA interventions was associated with intervention effects. Methods: A systematic search strategy was used to identify eligible studies from MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, Web of Science, Scopus and The Cochrane Library, published between January 1990 and March 2020. Randomised controlled trials, using digital technology as the primary intervention tool, and a control group that did not receive any digital technology-based intervention were included, provided they had a measure of PA as an outcome. Lastly, studies that did not have any measure of SES were excluded from the review. Risk of Bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool version 2. Results: Of the 14,589 records initially identified, 19 studies were included in the final meta-analysis. Using random-effects models, in low SES there was a standardised mean difference (SMD (95%CI)) in PA between intervention and control groups of 0.06 (- 0.08,0.20). In high SES the SMD was 0.34 (0.22,0.45). Heterogeneity was modest in both low (I2 = 0.18) and high (I2 = 0) SES groups. The studies used a range of digital technologies and BCTs in their interventions, but the main findings were consistent across all of the sub-group analyses (digital interventions with a PA only focus, country, chronic disease, and duration of intervention) and there was no association with the number or type of BCTs. Discussion: Digital interventions targeting PA do not show equivalent efficacy for people of low and high SES. For people of low SES, there is no evidence that digital PA interventions are effective, irrespective of the behaviour change techniques used. In contrast, the same interventions in high SES participants do indicate effectiveness. To reduce inequalities and improve effectiveness, future development of digital interventions aimed at improving PA must make more effort to meet the needs of low SES people within the target population.

Amperometric micro-immunosensor for the detection of tumor biomarker.

Healthcare professional and commissioners' perspectives on the factors facilitating and hindering the implementation of digital tools for self-management of long-term conditions within UK healthcare pathways

[The size of nanoparticles after incorporation into gastroresistant spheroids].

Patient experience and barriers of using a mHealth exercise app in musculoskeletal (MSK) Physiotherapy

Digital Lifestyle Interventions for Young People With Mental Illness: A Qualitative Study Among Mental Health Care Professionals

Barriers and facilitators to physical activity and further digital exercise intervention among inactive British adolescents in secondary schools: a qualitative study with physical education teachers

Barriers to and Facilitators of the Implementation of Digital Mental Health Interventions as Perceived by Primary Care Decision Makers: Content Analysis of Structured Open-Ended Survey Data

Understanding inherent influencing factors to digital health adoption in general practices through a mixed-methods analysis

Determinants of physical activity promotion in primary care from the patient perspective of people at risk of or living with chronic disease: a COM-B analysis

Elan: ziconotide review focused on off-label uses.

Understanding exercise referrals in primary care: a qualitative study of General Practitioners and Physiotherapists

P071 Exploring experiences and preferences of people with rheumatoid arthritis for digital interventions to promote physical activity (PA)

“My Patients Asked Me If I Owned a Fruit Stand in Town or Something.” Barriers and Facilitators of Personalized Dietary Advice Implemented in a Primary Care Setting

A Clinician and Electronic Health Record Wearable Device Intervention to Increase Physical Activity in Patients With Obesity: Formative Qualitative Study

Dynamics of Perceived Barriers to Change Physical Activity and Eating Habits in Adults Before and During a Lifestyle Intervention in a Primary Care Setting: A Mixed Methods Approach

Evaluating the Digital Health Experience for Patients in Primary Care: Mixed Methods Study

The time course of aconitate formation from isocitrate in H2O and D2O.

Developing and Evaluating Digital Interventions to Promote Behavior Change in Health and Health Care: Recommendations Resulting From an International Workshop

Current experience and future potential of facilitating access to digital NHS primary care services in England: the Di-Facto mixed-methods study

Barriers and facilitators to clinical behaviour change by primary care practitioners: a theory-informed systematic review of reviews using the Theoretical Domains Framework and Behaviour Change Wheel

The effectiveness of digital interventions for increasing physical activity in individuals of low socioeconomic status: a systematic review and meta-analysis