Abstract:The presented study analyzes the reasons for the need to move away from the US dollar (hereinafter referred to as the dollar) as a universal means of payment in international trade based on the existing threats, examines alternative means of international payments, and identifies their benefits and drawbacks in the context of Russia’s economic security. Aim . The study aims to identify and characterize the means of international payments that fall in line with Russia’s strategic priorities from the perspective of economic security. Tasks . The author considers the risks of using the dollar in international payments and reserves, assesses various means of international payments from the perspective of Russia’s strategic interests, and evaluates the possibility of substituting the dollar with alternative means of international payments. Methods . This study analyzes information from the International Economic Forums, statistics of the Central Bank of Russia, Federal State Statistics Service, Decree of the President of the Russian Federation on the economic security strategy of the Russian Federation until 2030, reports of news agencies, and works of Russian and foreign authors on the subject. Results . Based on the results of the conducted study, the author draws several conclusions. Due to many factors, the most important of them being the volume of trade in dollars, the dollar will remain the world’s leading currency in international trade. However, given that de-dollarization is a global process, the existing trends will amplify. A supranational currency is unlikely to appear for a number of reasons. First, the obvious opposition of the United States due to its unwillingness to let go of such a powerful lever of economic well-being and political influence as the use of the dollar as a global means of payment. The US would probably agree to creating a supranational currency in the medium term if the global process of de-dollarization reaches critical values. Second, the financial and trade centers of the euro and renminbi area are likely to focus on developing their own currencies, especially given the growing global GDP and China’s trade. Creating a supranational currency based on the existing structure of the International monetary Fund (hereinafter — the IMF), following the example of Special Drawing Rights (SDR), with the IMF virtually controlled by the United States, will not eliminate the threat of the currency being used as an instrument of political pressure on individual countries. Replacing the dollar with such kind of supranational currency does not serve the interests of Russia’s economic security. A potential alternative involves creating a supranational currency based on a structure that is independent of the IMF. In this case, the obstacles would include the obvious opposition of the US and its allies and the potential influence of the US on the emission of the supranational currency using its foreign political resources to affect the decisions made by other countries. Using national currencies in international trade in the medium term under the influence of globalization would lead to a formation of multiple currency centers. These centers would most likely be the dollar, euro, renminbi, and ruble. Conclusions . The creation of a ruble-based International Monetary Center with the CIS, BRIC countries (except China), and Turkey serves Russia’s strategic interests. Further consolidation around the ruble would require implementing a financial sustainability policy, maintaining the stability of the macroeconomic environment, creating an international bank similar to the IMF with payments made in rubles, strengthening offshore ruble areas, and increasing high-tech exports.

Russian Currency's external shocks and domestic policy effectiveness amid geopolitical tensions

Assessing the impact of the Russia-Ukraine war and COVID-19 on selected European currencies and key commodities

Spillover effects of Ruble's turmoil on foreign exchange markets after the invasion of Ukraine

Impact of Oil Price Shocks on Crypto and Conventional Financial Assets during Financial Crises: Evidence from the Russian Financial Market

Exchange rate instabilities during the Russia-Ukraine war: Evidence from V4 countries

Comparative investment analysis between crypto and conventional financial assets amid heightened geopolitical risk

The Impact of Geopolitical Risks on Foreign Exchange Markets: Evidence from The Russia-Ukraine War

Macroeconomic performance of oil price shocks in Russia

Examination of Bitcoin Hedging, Diversification and Safe-Haven Ability During Financial Crisis: Evidence from Equity, Bonds, Precious Metals and Exchange Rate Markets

Connectedness between geopolitical risk, financial instability indices and precious metals markets: Novel findings from Russia Ukraine conflict perspective

EU sectoral stocks amid geopolitical risk, market sentiment, and crude oil implied volatility: An asymmetric analysis of the Russia-Ukraine tensions

Research on the Impact of Geopolitical Instability on Russian Trade

How do the reserve currency and uncertainties in major markets affect the uncertainty of oil prices over time?

How do energy price hikes affect exchange rates during the war in Ukraine?

Accommodative monetary policy, fiscal stimulus and foreign exchange reserves within the framework of Russian national economic interests: Long-standing problems and new challenges

War in Ukraine: challenges for the global economy

Export of agricultural products as a determinant of currency security of Ukrainian economy

Evaluating the dynamic connectedness of financial assets and bank indices during black-swan events: A Quantile-VAR approach

The dynamic volatility nexus of geo-political risks, stocks, bond, bitcoin, gold and oil during COVID-19 and Russian-Ukraine war

Russia's Strategic Priorities in the Global Monetary System from the Point of View of Ensuring Foreign Economic Security

The Yield and Volatility of Financial Markets in the UK and China under the Russia-Ukraine Conflict