Animism in childhood thinking: A new look at an old question.

Merry Bullock
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.21.2.217
1985-03-01
Developmental Psychology
Abstract:Preschool-aged children's knowledge of the distinctions between animate and inanimate objects was assessed by showing stimulus films of animate and inanimate objects that moved in different ways. Responses gathered included attributions of animate or inanimate properties, justifications for attribution choices and accuracy in labeling objects as alive or not. The results indicated that 5- and some 4-year-old children performed near adult levels, whereas 3-year-olds did not, although the animate-inanimate distinction did mediate their behavior. A generalized “animistic” attitude was not found; rather, developmental changes appeared to accrue from increasing precision about the specific properties that do and do not distinguish animate from inanimate objects.
psychology, developmental
What problem does this paper attempt to address?