18F-FDG PET imaging for treatment response assessment and management guidance in patients with skull base osteomyelitis

Awiral Saxena,Padma Subramanyam,Manjit Sarma,Bhagirath Bhad,Renjitha Bhaskaran,Shanmuga Sundaram Palaniswamy
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/mnm.0000000000001847
2024-04-15
Nuclear Medicine Communications
Abstract:Objective The objective of this study is to evaluate the role of hybrid 18F-FDG PET for treatment response assessment and management guidance in patients with skull base osteomyelitis. Materials and methods Retrospectively, 33 patients, with at least a baseline and follow-up PET (computed tomography/MRI) scan, were included. Parameters like standardized uptake value (SUV) max, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and C-reactive protein (CRP) (initial, follow-up, percentage change) were analysed and outcomes based on 18F-FDG PET reports were classified into resolution (a), partial response (b), progression (c) and stable disease (d). The clinical course and response on anatomical imaging were also compared with 18F-FDG PET. Results There was mild correlation between initial SUV with ESR (0.338) and CRP (0.384). Moderate correlation was seen between follow-up SUV and CRP (0.619), percentage change in SUV max (PC SUV) with percentage change in ESR (0.456) and CRP (0.668). Mean PC SUV was 70% (a), 35% (b), −40% (c) and −18% (d), respectively. 48% (16/33) (resolution, progression, stable disease) patients had clear management change with 18F-FDG PET with either escalation or stopping of antibiotics/antifungals. Management decision in partial response group (52%, 17/33) was taken clinically. On retrospective PC SUV analysis, treatment continuation group (8 patients) showed 20% decrease, whereas the group that was only monitored further (9 patients) had 48% reduction in SUV. Conclusion 18F-FDG PET showed a moderate association with clinical markers used in follow-up of patients with skull base osteomyelitis and is a reliable investigation for assessment of disease status. This can be used as a guide along with clinical evaluation for de-escalation of treatment.
radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging
What problem does this paper attempt to address?