Abstract:Inconsistent peak picking outcomes are a critical concern in processing liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS)-based untargeted metabolomics data. This work systematically studied the mechanisms behind the discrepancies among five commonly used peak picking algorithms, including CentWave in XCMS, linear-weighted moving average in MS-DIAL, automated data analysis pipeline (ADAP) in MZmine 2, Savitzky-Golay in El-MAVEN, and FeatureFinderMetabo in OpenMS. We first collected 10 public metabolomics datasets representing various LC-MS analytical conditions. We then incorporated several novel strategies to (i) acquire the optimal peak picking parameters of each algorithm for a fair comparison, (ii) automatically recognize false metabolic features with poor chromatographic peak shapes, and (iii) evaluate the real metabolic features that are missed by the algorithms. By applying these strategies, we compared the true, false, and undetected metabolic features in each data processing outcome. Our results show that linear-weighted moving average consistently outperforms the other peak picking algorithms. To facilitate a mechanistic understanding of the differences, we proposed six peak attributes: ideal slope, sharpness, peak height, mass deviation, peak width, and scan number. We also developed an R program to automatically measure these attributes for detected and undetected true metabolic features. From the results of the 10 datasets, we concluded that four peak attributes, including ideal slope, scan number, peak width, and mass deviation, are critical for the detectability of a peak. For instance, the focus on ideal slope critically hinders the extraction of true metabolic features with low ideal slope scores in linear-weighted moving average, Savitzky-Golay, and ADAP. The relationships between peak picking algorithms and peak attributes were also visualized in a principal component analysis biplot. Overall, the clear comparison and explanation of the differences between peak picking algorithms can lead to the design of better peak picking strategies in the future.

Deep Learning-Assisted Peak Curation for Large-Scale LC-MS Metabolomics

Deep learning for the precise peak detection in high-resolution LC-MS data.

Deep Neural Networks for Classification of LC-MS Spectral Peaks.

3D-MSNet: A point cloud based deep learning model for untargeted feature detection and quantification in profile LC-HRMS data

PeakDecoder enables machine learning-based metabolite annotation and accurate profiling in multidimensional mass spectrometry measurements

PeakBot: machine-learning-based chromatographic peak picking

PeakPerformance - a tool for Bayesian inference-based fitting of LC-MS/MS peaks

Peak Annotation and Verification Engine for Untargeted LC-MS Metabolomics

Mechanistic Understanding of the Discrepancies between Common Peak Picking Algorithms in Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry-Based Metabolomics

Peak Alignment of Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry Data with Deep Learning

PeakQC: A Software Tool for Omics-Agnostic Automated Quality Control of Mass Spectrometry Data

Untargeted LC–MS Data Preprocessing in Metabolomics

Automated optimization of XCMS parameters for improved peak picking of liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry data using the coefficient of variation and parameter sweeping for untargeted metabolomics

MassLite: An integrated python platform for single cell mass spectrometry metabolomics data pretreatment with graphical user interface and advanced peak alignment method

Stronger findings from mass spectral data through multi-peak modeling

Comparing Targeted vs. Untargeted MS2 Data-Dependent Acquisition for Peak Annotation in LC–MS Metabolomics

Deep Learning-Assisted Analysis of Immunopeptidomics Data

MetaboAnalystR 4.0: a unified LC-MS workflow for global metabolomics

Intensity-dependent mass search for improving metabolite database matches in chemical isotope labeling LC-QTOF-MS-based metabolomics

Finnee 2024 – a Matlab toolbox for untargeted analysis of LC-HRMS datasets with MS1 scans acquired as continuous scans.

Deep learning neural network tools for proteomics