Abstract:OBJECTIVE The authors compared the contemporary perioperative procedure-related complications between coiling with stent placement and coiling without stent placement for acutely ruptured aneurysms treated in a single center after improvement of interventional skills and strategy. METHODS In an institutional review board-approved protocol, 133 patients who underwent coiling with stent placement and 289 patients who underwent coiling without stent placement from January 2012 to December 2014 were consecutively reviewed retrospectively. Baseline characteristics, procedure-related complications and mortality rate, angiographic follow-up results, and clinical outcomes were compared between the two groups. Univariate analysis and logistic regression analysis were performed to determine the association of procedure-related complications of coiling with stent placement with potential risk factors. RESULTS The coiling/stent group and coiling/no-stent group were statistically comparable with respect to all baseline characteristics except for aneurysm location (p < 0.001) and parent artery configuration (p = 0.024). The immediate embolization results and clinical outcomes between the two groups showed no significant differences (p = 0.807 and p = 0.611, respectively). The angiographic follow-up results of the coiling in stent group showed a significant higher occlusion rate and lower recurrence rate compared with the coiling/no-stent group (82.5% vs 66.7%, 3.5% vs 14.5%, p = 0.007). Procedure-related intraoperative rupture and thrombosis, postoperative early rebleeding and thrombosis, and external ventricular drainage-related hemorrhagic event occurred in 3.0% (4 of 133), 2.3% (3 of 133), 1.5% (2 of 133), 0.7% (1 of 133), and 0.8% (1 of 133) of the coiling/stent group compared with 1.0% (3 of 289), 1.4% (4 of 289), 1.4% (4 of 289), and 0.7% (2 of 289) of the coiling/no-stent group, respectively (p = 0.288, p = 0.810, p = 1.000, p = 0.315, and p = 1.000, respectively). One patient presented with coil protrusion in the group of coiling without stent. The procedure-related mortality was 1.5% (2 of 133) in the coiling/stent group and 0.7% in the coiling/no-stent group (p = 0.796). Multivariable analysis showed no significant predictors for the total perioperative procedure-related complications, hemorrhagic complications, or ischemic complications. CONCLUSIONS The perioperative procedure-related complications and mortality rate did not differ significantly between the coiling/stent group and the coiling/no-stent group for patients with acutely ruptured aneurysms. Considering the better angiographic follow-up results, coiling with stent placement might be a feasible, safe, and promising option for treatment in the acute phase of selected wide-necked ruptured intracranial aneurysms.

Comparison of Parent Artery Occlusion and Stent-Assisted Treatments in Ruptured Vertebral Artery Dissecting Aneurysms

Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of Vertebral Artery Dissecting Aneurysms Treated with Endovascular Treatments: A 12-year Single-Center Experience

Clinical Efficacy Between Microsurgical Clipping and Endovascular Coiling in the Treatment of Ruptured Poor-Grade Anterior Circulation Aneurysms

Treatment of Ruptured Vertebral Artery Dissecting Aneurysms Distal to the Posterior Inferior Cerebellar Artery: Stenting or Trapping?

Predictors of unfavorable outcome in stent-assisted coiling for symptomatic unruptured intracranial spontaneous vertebral artery dissecting aneurysms (uis-VADAs): results from a multicenter study

Stent Placement to Treat Ruptured Vertebral Dissecting Aneurysms

Clinical characteristics, endovascular choices, and surgical outcomes of intracranial vertebral artery dissecting aneurysms: a consecutive series of 196 patients

Comparing the safety and effectiveness of overlapping stents with flow diverters for unruptured vertebral artery dissecting aneurysms

Efficacy and predicting factors of multimodal treatment for ruptured intracranial vertebral artery dissecting aneurysms

Reconstructive Treatment Of Ruptured Intracranial Spontaneous Vertebral Artery Dissection Aneurysms: Long-Term Results And Predictors Of Unfavorable Outcomes

Endovascular treatment of ruptured vertebral artery dissecting aneurysms with stents and coils

Clinical and Angiographic Outcomes of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Intracranial Vertebral Artery Dissecting Aneurysms Using Double-Overlapping Stents : Low-Profile Visualized Intraluminal Support within Enterprise Stents

Stent-assisted Coiling Vs. Coiling Alone of Ruptured Tiny Intracranial Aneurysms: A Contemporary Cohort Study in a High-Volume Center

Reconstructive Endovascular Treatment Of Vertebral Artery Dissecting Aneurysms With The Low-Profile Visualized Intraluminal Support (Lvis) Device

Early Management of Intracranial Ruptured Vertebral Dissecting Aneurysms

Stent-assisted Coiling Versus Coiling Alone of Poor-Grade Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysms: a Multicenter Study.

Stent-assisted Coil Placement for the Treatment of 211 Acutely Ruptured Wide-necked Intracranial Aneurysms: A Single-Center 11-Year Experience

Safety of Coiling with Stent Placement for the Treatment of Ruptured Wide-Necked Intracranial Aneurysms: a Contemporary Cohort Study in a High-Volume Center after Improvement of Skills and Strategy

Safety and Long-term Efficacy of Stent-assisted Coiling for the Treatment of Complex Posterior Cerebral Artery Aneurysms

Overlapping Stents-Assisted Coiling for Vertebral Artery Dissecting Aneurysm : LVIS Stent Within Neuroform EZ Stent.

Early Management of Ruptured Intracranial Vertebral Dissecting Aneurysms