Improving Diagnostic Procedures in Autism for Girls and Women: A Narrative Review
Julia Cook,Laura Hull,Will Mandy
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/ndt.s372723
IF: 2.989
2024-03-08
Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
Abstract:Julia Cook, 1, &ast Laura Hull, 2, &ast Will Mandy 3 1 Social, Genetic and Developmental Psychiatry Centre, King's College London, London, UK; 2 Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK; 3 Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK &astThese authors contributed equally to this work Correspondence: Will Mandy, Email Biases exist in the diagnostic process for autism spectrum disorder (henceforth "autism"), which result in some girls and women being diagnosed later or missed entirely. Current diagnostic tools may not capture the full range of behavioural presentations of autism, leading to under-identification. This review explores why these biases may occur, and how diagnostic procedures could be adapted to better identify autistic girls and women. We recommend that diagnostic assessments are adjusted to capture a broader range of behavioural exemplars of autism; that camouflaging of autistic traits is taken into account; and that care is taken to ensure co-occurring mental health conditions do not overshadow autism diagnosis. We offer recommendations, building on gold-standard diagnostic guidelines, for how diagnostic procedures can be improved for girls and women. Keywords: autism, girls, women, diagnosis Autism Spectrum Disorder (hereafter "autism") is a neurodevelopmental condition, that first emerges in infancy and early childhood and persists across the lifespan. It is largely determined by genetic factors, with a heritability estimated between 64% and 91%. 1 Autism is highly heterogeneous both in terms of its presentation and aetiology but, nevertheless, the condition is characterized by a set of core, diagnostic characteristics, namely, atypical social relating and social communication, as well as a tendency towards inflexibility and unusual processing of sensory experience. Most instances of autism should be considered dimensional, rather than categorical: they represent one end of an autistic trait continuum that extends throughout the general population, with no natural "cut point" between autism and non-autism. 2 Autism commonly co-occurs with other neurodevelopmental challenges, in particular difficulties with speech and language and intellectual development. Nevertheless, most autistic people have fluent language and IQs in the normal range. 3 Once considered a rare condition, autism is now widely diagnosed. Its epidemiological prevalence is estimated as being 1–2%, but evidence is emerging in some industrialized, western countries that actual rates of diagnosis are much higher than this within certain groups, defined by age and sex. For example, in the UK amongst boys aged 5 to 9, reported rates of diagnosis are around 4%. 4 The dramatic growth in the epidemiological and administrative prevalence of autism of recent years started in the 1990s and appears to be ongoing. This phenomenon is not fully understood, but the weight of evidence suggests it is driven by improved recognition, especially amongst those with normal-range IQ, and a broadening of the diagnostic criteria over time. Autism is not a mental health condition, but autistic people are at high risk of developing mental health problems. One seminal study found that in a community sample of autistic young people, 70% had at least one mental health diagnosis, and 40% had two or more. 5 These very high rates of mental health difficulties persist into adulthood, although the precise nature of risk changes with development. In childhood, anxiety difficulties and emotional and behavioural regulation challenges (eg, Attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder, oppositional defiant disorder) are most common. By adulthood, depression and anxiety problems predominate; and suicide rates are substantially higher for autistic, compared to non-autistic, adults. 6,7 Under current systems of care, outcomes for autistic people are amongst the worst for any psychiatric diagnosis. 8 In addition to the high rates of mental health problems described above, autistic people are at elevated risk of educational under-attainment, unemployment, underemployment, social isolation, poverty, homelessness and low quality of life. Further, compared to non-autistics, autistic people suffer higher rates of morbidity in relation to a range of physical illnesses and higher mortality. 9 Traditionally, understanding of autism has been structured within a "pathology paradigm" (sometimes called the "medical model"), that views autism as a disorder; and which aims to understand autistic behaviours and the challenges faced by autistic people as direct consequences of their individual "deficits" and "impairments". For exampl -Abstract Truncated-
psychiatry,clinical neurology