Diagnostic value of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging for myocardial fibrosis in patients with heart failure and its predictive value for prognosis

Guangyao Lin,Bei Dong,Yuzhou Li,Wenqi Huang
2022-07-15
Abstract:Objective: To determine the diagnostic value of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMRI) for myocardial fibrosis (MF) in patients with heart failure (HF) and its predictive value for prognosis. Methods: A total of 180 patients with heart failure who were hospitalized in the Cardiology Department of The First People's Hospital of Shangqiu City from September 2019 to May 2021 were selected and assigned to Group B (n=80) given levosimendan and Group A (n=100) given levosimendan combined with ivabradine hydrochloride. The cardiac function indicators (left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and left ventricular end-systolic diameter (LVESD) were measured by nuclear magnetic resonance (MRI). Myocardial fibrosis (MF)-related indicators (pyridinoline cross-linked carboxy-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen (ICTP), N-terminal propeptide of procollagen type III (PIIINP), connective tissue growth factor (CTGF), and hyaluronic acid (HA), inflammatory factors (Hs-CRP and IL-8) were measured using ELISA. Quality of life (QoL) and physical recovery (6-min walking test (6MWT), Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA), and Barthel index) of the two groups were compared. The late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) was used to analyze the occurrence of MF in patients. The patients were further divided into the LGE (+) group (cases) and LGE (-) group (cases). The changes of cardiac function indicators before treatment were analyzed, and their predictive value was analyzed. Results: Compared with Group B, Group A showed a lower incidence of complications, and presented a higher LVEF level and lower levels of LVESV, LVESD, ICTP, PIIINP, CTGF, HA, LN, and inflammatory factors. The area under the curves of LVESV, LVESD, and LVEF in predicting MF were all >0.7. Conclusion: Levosimendan combined with ivabradine hydrochloride can effectively alleviate MF in patients with MF, and CMRI has a good predictive value for MF in such patients, which is worthy of clinical promotion.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?