The economic burden of HIV-associated wasting in the era of modern antiretroviral therapy

Javeed Siddiqui,Shanti K Samuel,Brooke Hayward,Kelly A Wirka,Kathleen L Deering,Qing Harshaw,Amy Phillips,Michael Harbour

DOI: https://doi.org/10.18553/jmcp.2022.22097

Abstract:BACKGROUND: HIV-associated wasting (HIVAW) is associated with increased morbidity and mortality in people living with HIV (PWH). Evaluating health care resource utilization and cost predictors of HIVAW is important in understanding the overall economic burden of the disease. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the economic burden and cost predictors associated with HIVAW. METHODS: This analysis of the IBM MarketScan Commercial, Medicare Supplemental, and Medicaid databases included members with a claim for HIV (using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision and Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification codes) between July 2012 and September 2018, with the HIV index date defined as the first HIV diagnosis claim in the dataset. PWH were excluded if they were aged less than 18 years, had any malignancy claim, or had less than 6 months of enrollment data pre-HIV or post-HIV index date. Members were defined as having HIVAW using an algorithm of claims for weight loss-related diagnoses, appetite stimulant or nontestosterone anabolic agents, or enteral/parenteral nutrition at any time post-HIV index. Taking antiretroviral therapy (ART) was defined as having at least 1 pharmacy claim of any ART 12 months post-HIV index. Total all-cause costs were calculated as the sum of payments for hospitalizations, emergency department visits, outpatient visits, and pharmacy use. A multivariate generalized linear model with log-link and γ distribution was used to estimate the impact of HIVAW predictors of total all-cause costs. RESULTS: Among 42,587 members with HIV included in the study (64.6% male; mean age: 44 years; 67.5% insured with Medicaid; and 63.9% taking ART), the overall prevalence of HIVAW was 18.3% during the study period. HIVAW prevalence was 17.9% for those taking ART and 19.1% for those not taking ART. Prevalence by payer type was 7.5% for Commercial ± Medicare Supplemental and 23.5% for Medicaid. Members with HIVAW had more comorbidities and opportunistic infections compared with members without HIVAW. Members with HIVAW were also more than twice as likely to be hospitalized (71.1% vs 32.1%) and had 5 times the number of hospitalizations (1.0 vs 0.2) and twice the number of emergency department visits (3.0 vs 1.3) per year post-index compared with members without HIVAW (P < 0.01). HIVAW was associated with 1.3-times-higher mean annualized total all-cause costs per member (95% CI = 1.26-1.36). CONCLUSIONS: HIVAW remains prevalent despite advances in ART and is associated with additional health care resource utilization and costs. Further research is needed to better understand the relationship between HIVAW and comorbidity burden and ART utilization and payer types. DISCLOSURES: This study was sponsored by EMD Serono, Inc., Rockland, MA, USA (CrossRef Funder ID: 10.13039/100004755). Dr Siddiqui has received consulting and speaking fees from AbbVie, BioFire, Cumberland, EMD Serono, Inc., Rockland, MA, USA, and Merck. Dr Samuel, Ms Hayward, Ms Wirka, Dr Phillips, and Dr Harbour are employees of EMD Serono, Inc., Rockland, MA, USA. Drs Deering and Harshaw are employees of EPI-Q, Inc., which received payment from EMD Serono, Inc., Rockland, MA, USA, for the development and execution of this study.