Epidemiology and antibiotic resistance of prosthetic joint infections according to time of occurrence, a 10-year study

Alice Casenaz,Lionel Piroth,Ludovic Labattut,Thibault Sixt,Arnaud Magallon,Adrien Guilloteau,Catherine Neuwirth,Lucie Amoureux

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinf.2022.07.009

Abstract:Objectives: To describe the microorganisms responsible for prosthetic joint infections (PJIs) and their antimicrobial susceptibilities, and to propose appropriate empirical antimicrobial treatments (EATs) according to time of occurrence METHODS: This 10-year retrospective study presents the bacterial etiology of 282 consecutive PJIs in a French hospital according to time of occurrence (adapted from Zimmerli's classification: early, <3 months; delayed, 3-12 months; late acute, >12 months with hematogenous seeding or contiguous spread; late chronic, >12 months without hematogenous seeding). The expected efficacy of various EATs was analyzed for each PJI. Results: Staphylococci were the most commonly found bacteria (S. aureus (44.3%), coagulase-negative staphylococci (25.2%) with 15.2% and 49.3% methicillin resistance, respectively), followed by Gram-negative bacilli (GNB) (17.7%) and streptococci (14.9%). The distribution of species varied between categories, but antibiotics targeting GNBs were required in all categories. Imipenem-vancomycin was the most effective combination (99.3%) but should be reserved for patients with suspected resistant GNB. Cefotaxime-vancomycin was less effective in early/delayed and late PJIs (91.1% and 86.1%, respectively), due to resistant GNB and polymicrobial infections. Piperacillin/tazobactam-vancomycin appeared to be appropriate in all situations (>96% efficacy). Conclusion: Proposing universal recommendations remains challenging, but a good understanding of the local epidemiology is important for optimizing EATs.