Modelling assessment of resource competition for renewable basic chemicals and the effect of recycling

Frazer Musonda,Markus Millinger,Daniela Thrän

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.13133

2024-03-08

GCB Bioenergy

Abstract:This work assesses the potential contributions of biomass and renewable H2 resources towards a net‐zero greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions for the German chemical industry until 2050, in competition with the energy sector. This was done using a bottom‐up mathematical optimization model, with the objective of allocating primary resources to the power, heat, transport and chemicals sectors in a GHG abatement cost‐optimal manner. The work concludes that a net‐zero emissions chemicals sector can be attained at a high CO2‐price of 480–810 €/tCO2 and that the recycling of chemical end products at their end of life is critical to reducing abatement costs. This work assesses pathways towards a net‐zero greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions chemical industry sector in Germany until 2050, focusing on the ammonia, methanol, ethylene and adipic acid subsectors and the effect of the recycling of C embedded in chemical end products on the GHG abatement cost and primary resource demand. This was done using a bottom‐up mathematical optimization model, including the energy sectors and the chemicals sector, with electricity and biobased options considered. Results show that net‐zero GHG emissions for the considered chemicals in 2050 are attainable at a marginal cost of 640–900 €/tCO2‐eq, even with 26%–36% of demand being satisfied by fossil production routes. This is possible because renewable organic chemicals can act as carbon sinks if, at their end of life, C is permanently stored via landfilling or passed on to the next value chain via recycling. Nonetheless, considering the cost implications, the practical deployment of renewable chemicals is a challenge. The considered renewable chemicals cost 1.3–8 times more than their fossil counterparts, resulting in a marginal CO2 price of 480 €/tCO2‐eq when all primary resources (energy crops, forest residues and renewable electricity) are considered, or 810 €/tCO2‐eq when the availability of arable land is restricted. In the transition to net‐zero emissions for the chemicals under study, a circular economy is important not only for reducing demand for primary resources as is typically the case but also reduces GHG abatement costs by 13%–24% through carbon capture and utilization effects.

energy & fuels,agronomy