Abstract:Boolean networks (BNs) are a well-accepted modelling formalism in computational systems biology. Nevertheless, modellers often cannot identify only a single BN that matches the biological reality. The typical reasons for this is insufficient knowledge or a lack of experimental data. Formally, this uncertainty can be expressed using partially specified Boolean networks (PSBNs), which encode the wide range of network candidates into a single structure. In this paper, we target the control of PSBNs. The goal of BN control is to find perturbations which guarantee stabilisation of the system in the desired state. Specifically, we consider variable perturbations (gene knock-out and over-expression) with three types of application time-window: one-step, temporary, and permanent. While the control of fully specified BNs is a thoroughly explored topic, control of PSBNs introduces additional challenges that we address in this paper. In particular, the unspecified components of the model cause a significant amount of additional state space explosion. To address this issue, we propose a fully symbolic methodology that can represent the numerous system variants in a compact form. In fully specified models, the efficiency of a perturbation is characterised by the count of perturbed variables (the perturbation size). However, in the case of a PSBN, a perturbation might work only for a subset of concrete BN models. To that end, we introduce and quantify perturbation robustness. This metric characterises how efficient the given perturbation is with respect to the model uncertainty. Finally, we evaluate the novel control methods using non-trivial real-world PSBN models. We inspect the method's scalability and efficiency with respect to the size of the state space and the number of unspecified components. We also compare the robustness metrics for all three perturbation types. Our experiments support the hypothesis that one-step perturbations are significantly less robust than temporary and permanent ones.

Robust Stabilizing Control of Perturbed Biological Networks via Coordinate Transformation and Algebraic Analysis

Attractor-Transition Control of Complex Biological Networks: A Constant Control Approach

Output Stabilizing Control of Complex Biological Networks Based on Boolean Algebra Analysis

Pinning Control for Stabilization of Boolean Networks under Knock-Out Perturbation

Asynchronous Stabilization of Boolean Control Networks with Stochastic Switched Signals.

Global robust stability and stabilization of Boolean network with disturbances

Robust Set Stabilization of Boolean Control Networks: an Efficient Approach based on Reverse Set Propagation

Temporary and permanent control of partially specified Boolean networks

Distributed Pinning Control: Stabilizing Large Boolean Networks Subjected to Perturbations

Stabilization of Delayed Boolean Networks Using Constrained State Pinning Control

The Outputs Robustness of Boolean Control Networks Via Pinning Control

Stabilizing Boolean Networks by Optimal Event-Triggered Feedback Control

Stabilization and Finite-Time Stabilization of Probabilistic Boolean Control Networks

A Faster Approach for Robust Set Stabilization of Boolean Control Networks

Output Feedback Stabilizer Design of Boolean Networks Based on Network Structure

Toward Stabilizable Large-Scale Boolean Networks by Controlling the Minimal Set of Nodes

State Feedback Stabilization for Probabilistic Boolean Networks.

Towards Stabilizable Large-Scale Boolean Networks By Controlling the Minimal Set of Nodes

Robust set stabilization of Boolean control networks with edge removal perturbations

Robust Flipping Stabilization of Boolean Networks: A Q-learning Approach.

Necessary and Sufficient Conditions on Pinning Stabilization for Stochastic Boolean Networks.