Retrospective Single-Center Comparative Analysis of Ultrasound-Guided Versus Non-ultrasound-Guided Nerve Blocks in Extremity Surgeries
Jian-Feng Zhang,Li Zhang,Yong Li,Yong-Xin Huo,Hui Wang,Lei Wang,Bao-Cang Wang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jum.15747
2021-01-01
Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine
Abstract:OBJECTIVES:Although ultrasound-guided peripheral nerve blocks have become increasingly popular, it is arguable at present whether ultrasound guidance is a necessary tool for peripheral nerve blocks. The purpose of this study was to assess the significance of ultrasound-guided peripheral nerve blocks in reducing complications.METHODS:From January 2013 to January 2019, 17,823 patients who underwent peripheral nerve blocks with/without ultrasound guidance were reviewed, recording data on their age, sex, height, weight, American Society of Anesthesiologists, block type, operation type, operation duration, and complications. The patients were divided into 2 groups: 9372 cases with ultrasound guidance (US Group) and 8451 cases without ultrasound guidance (No-US Group). To control selection bias, a total of 16,236 patients were finally included in this study after 1:1 propensity score matching, including 8118 cases in the US Group and 8118 cases in the No-US Group. Outcome measures included local anesthetic systemic toxicity (LAST), nerve injury, incomplete block anesthesia (IBA), local hematoma, and infection at the block site.RESULTS:Baseline characteristics of patients were similar between the two groups (P >.05, respectively). Our study revealed that the incidence of infection was similar between the two groups (P >.05). However, the incidences of LAST, nerve injury, IBA, and local hematoma in the US Group were significantly lower than those in the No-US Group (P <.05, respectively).CONCLUSIONS:Our findings suggest that ultrasound-guided peripheral nerve blocks are associated with fewer complications and higher success rates, compared with the paresthesia approach.