Effect of Intermittent Oro-Esophageal Tube Feeding in Bulbar Palsy After Ischemic Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Study
Hongji Zeng,Weijia Zhao,Junfa Wu,Jihong Wei,Heping Li,Liugen Wang,Xi Zeng
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/strokeaha.123.046122
IF: 10.17
2024-03-22
Stroke
Abstract:Stroke, Ahead of Print. BACKGROUND:Nasogastric tube feeding (NG) has been widely used in patients with bulbar palsy after ischemic stroke but is associated with a significant risk of complications including malnutrition and pneumonia. Intermittent oro-esophageal tube feeding (IOE) can help alleviate these concerns. This study explored the clinical effect of IOE versus NG on nutritional status, swallowing function, stroke-associated pneumonia, and depression in patients with bulbar palsy after ischemic stroke.METHODS:This randomized controlled study included 148 patients with bulbar palsy after ischemic stroke who underwent routine treatment and swallowing rehabilitation training in the Department of Rehabilitation Medicine between July 2017 and July 2019 in China. The participants were randomly divided into the IOE group (n=74) and NG group (n=74) with IOE and NG as nutritional supports, respectively. The primary outcome was nutritional status including (1) body mass index (kg/m2), (2) serum ALB (albumin, g/L), and (3) PA (prealbumin, mg/L). The secondary outcomes were (1) swallowing function including (i) Functional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS) and (ii) Penetration-Aspiration Scale, (2) pneumonia, (3) depression, and (4) adverse events. Statistical analyses for continuous outcomes were performed usingttest, Mann-WhitneyUtest and Wilcoxon signed-rank test and categorical variables using χ2test. SPSS 21.0 was used for all analysis.RESULTS:There were no significant baseline differences between the 2 groups. After the treatment, the IOE group demonstrated significantly better results compared with the NG group in ALB ([32.71±0.94] versus [32.28±0.81] g/L;P=0.003), PA ([278.15±13.81] versus [270.31±15.08] mg/L;P=0.001], body mass index ([19.77±1.03] versus [19.41±0.98] kg/m2;P=0.002], FOIS (P<0.001), Penetration-Aspiration Scale (P<0.001), stroke-associated pneumonia ([1, 4.05%] versus [26, 35.14%];P<0.001), depression ([1, 1.35%] versus [44, 59.46%];P<0.001) and overall less adverse events (reflux, fever, discomfort in the throat;P<0.001).CONCLUSIONS:In patients with dysphagia with bulbar palsy after ischemic stroke who received routine treatment and swallowing rehabilitation training, IOE is safer and more conducive to the improvement of nutritional status, swallowing function, stroke-associated pneumonia, and depression than NG.REGISTRATION:URL:https://www.chictr.org.cn; Unique identifier: ChiCTR-INC-17011741.
peripheral vascular disease,clinical neurology