Gas Transfer Across Air‐Water Interfaces in Inland Waters: From Micro‐Eddies to Super‐Statistics
Gabriel Katul,Andrew Bragg,Ivan Mammarella,Heping Liu,Qi Li,Elie Bou‐Zeid
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1029/2023wr036615
IF: 5.4
2024-10-31
Water Resources Research
Abstract:In inland water covering lakes, reservoirs, and ponds, the gas exchange of slightly soluble gases such as carbon dioxide, dimethyl sulfide, methane, or oxygen across a clean and nearly flat air‐water interface is routinely described using a water‐side mean gas transfer velocity kL ̅ , where overline indicates time or ensemble averaging. The micro‐eddy surface renewal model predicts kL ̅=αoSc−1/2νε ̅1/4 , where Sc is the molecular Schmidt number, ν is the water kinematic viscosity, and ε ̅ is the waterside mean turbulent kinetic energy dissipation rate at or near the interface. While αo=0.39−0.46 has been reported across a number of data sets, others report large scatter or variability around this value range. It is shown here that this scatter can be partly explained by high temporal variability in instantaneous ε around ε ̅ , a mechanism that was not previously considered. As the coefficient of variation CVe in ε increases, αo must be adjusted by a multiplier 1+CVe2−3/32 that was derived from a log‐normal model for the probability density function of ε . Reported variations in αo with a macro‐scale Reynolds number can also be partly attributed to intermittency effects in ε . Such intermittency is characterized by the long‐range (i.e., power‐law decay) spatial auto‐correlation function of ε . That αo varies with a macro‐scale Reynolds number does not necessarily violate the micro‐eddy model. Instead, it points to a coordination between the macro‐ and micro‐scales arising from the transfer of energy across scales in the energy cascade.
environmental sciences,water resources,limnology