Alterations in functional connectivity and interactions in resting-state networks in female patients with functional constipation

Lei Zhang,Guanya Li,Yang Hu,Wenchao Zhang,Jia Wang,Weibin Ji,Fukun Jiang,Yaqi Zhang,Feifei Wu,Karen M von Deneen,Shijun Duan,Guangbin Cui,Yi Zhang,Yongzhan Nie
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-022-06275-6
Abstract:BACKGROUND : Patients with functional constipation (FCon) have been reported with brain functional and structural abnormalities. However, no studies have been performed to investigate the differences in resting-state networks (RSNs) and changes in functional connectivity (FC) between RSNs in patients with FCon. Thus, the current study aimed to identify abnormal FC within and interaction between RSNs in patients with FCon to reveal the underlying neural mechanism. Methods: Functional MRI with independent component analysis was applied to investigate alterations in FC within and functional network connectivity (FNC) between RSNs including default mode- (DMN), basal ganglia- (BGN), salience- (SN), and left and right control executive-networks (LCEN/RCEN) in 39 female patients with FCon and 36 female healthy controls (HC). Patient Assessment of Constipation Quality of Life Scale (PAC-QOL) and Patient Assessment of Constipation Symptom Scale (PAC-SYM) were used to assess the constipation symptoms. Results: FCon patients had changed regional FC between different networks contributing to the abnormal FNC among RSNs compared with HC. Patients with greater stool syndromes had increased FNC of BGN-SN and DMN-LCEN, and patients with greater worries/concerns and PAC-QOL total score had reduced FNC of SN-RCEN. The greater strength changes in FC in prefrontal and parietal cortices were associated with higher negative emotion scores and greater rectal symptoms, respectively. Conclusion: The findings suggested that FCon patients had altered FC within and interactions between RSNs and the brain FC changes were associated with constipation symptoms and altered emotions.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?