Effect of ischemic postconditioning in different time windows of acute myocardial infarction patients on efficiency of primary coronary intervention
Wei YANG,Huigen JIN,Zongjun LIU,Weiqing WANG,Dongyi WANG,Ying LAI,Zhihua WANG,Jun SHEN,Hongmei YU,Meng WEI,Beibei HAN,Zhigang LU
2008-01-01
Abstract:Objective To compare the effect of ischemic postconditioning on the efficiency of primary coronary intervention between 6 h and 6-12 h after the onset of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Methods A total of 160 patients with primary AMI were randomly divided into the following groups: ischemic postconditioning within 6 h of AMI onset (A1), control within 6 h of AMI onset (B1), ischemic postconditioning during 6-12 h of AMI onset (A2), and control during 6-12 h of AMI onset(B2). In the 2 control groups patients were not intervented in their infarct-related artery (IRA) within 5 mins; in the 2 ischemic postconditioning groups after IRA was re-opened within 1 min between inflation and deflation balloon under lower pressure; every circulation needed 60s and all the process had 4 circulations. Results Incidences of lower thrombolysis in myocardial infarction trial (TIMI) Ⅱ in A1 and A2 groups were 7.5% and 30.0% ( P<0.05), respectively. The incidences of lower Blush Ⅱ were 12.5% and 32.5% (P<0.05) after operations. There were significant differences in TIMI flow (1.71±0.30 vs. 2.01±0.62, P<0.05) and Blush flow (0.82±0.22 vs. 1.05±0.11, P<0.01) between the two groups after operation. Area under the curve of serum CK release during the first 72 h of reperfusion was significantly reduced in A1 group than in A2 group(57 998 vs. 79 868, P<0.05). In group A1, LVEDV, LVESV, and WMSI were significantly decreased during follow-up compared with those of hospitalization (P<0.05); but LVEF was remarkably increased during this period. In group A2, LVEDV, LVESV, and WMSI were significantly higher during follow-up than those of hospitalization (P<0.05), LVEF was similar to those of hospitalization. Incidences of malignant arrhythmia (0% vs. 17.5%, P<0.05), unstable angina (0% vs. 15.0%, P<0.05) in group A1 were notably decreased in group A2. The non-fatal heart failure (2.6% vs. 21.1%, P<0.05) and total MACE (5.1% vs. 26.3%, P<0.05) were significantly different between the two groups.Conclusion Process of ischemic postconditioning within 6 h after AMI may remarkably reduce infarct area, relieve reperfusion injury, and decrease no-reflow and cardiac events, and therefore protect the myocardium.