Characterization of interaction between blood coagulation factor VIII and LRP1 suggests dynamic binding by alternating complex contacts

Haarin Chun,James H Kurasawa,Philip Olivares,Ekaterina S Marakasova,Svetlana A Shestopal,Gabriela U Hassink,Elena Karnaukhova,Mary Migliorini,Juliet O Obi,Ally K Smith,Patrick L Wintrode,Prasannavenkatesh Durai,Keunwan Park,Daniel Deredge,Dudley K Strickland,Andrey G Sarafanov
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jth.15817
Abstract:Background: Deficiency in blood coagulation factor VIII (FVIII) results in life-threating bleeding (hemophilia A) treated by infusions of FVIII concentrates. To improve disease treatment, FVIII has been modified to increase its plasma half-life, which requires understanding mechanisms of FVIII catabolism. An important catabolic actor is hepatic low density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 1 (LRP1), which also regulates many other clinically significant processes. Previous studies showed complexity of FVIII site for binding LRP1. Objectives: To characterize binding sites between FVIII and LRP1 and suggest a model of the interaction. Methods: A series of recombinant ligand-binding complement-type repeat (CR) fragments of LRP1 including mutated variants was generated in a baculovirus system and tested for FVIII interaction using surface plasmon resonance, tissue culture model, hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry, and in silico. Results: Multiple CR doublets within LRP1 clusters II and IV were identified as alternative FVIII-binding sites. These interactions follow the canonical binding mode providing major binding energy, and additional weak interactions are contributed by adjacent CR domains. A representative CR doublet was shown to have multiple contact sites on FVIII. Conclusions: FVIII and LRP1 interact via formation of multiple complex contacts involving both canonical and non-canonical binding combinations. We propose that FVIII-LRP1 interaction occurs via switching such alternative binding combinations in a dynamic mode, and that this mechanism is relevant to other ligand interactions of the low-density lipoprotein receptor family members including LRP1.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?