Public Health Bankruptcy: Reduced and Abandoned

L. Boden,J. W. Pierce
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2190/NS1.1.j
1990-04-01
Abstract:Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA or the Superfund Act) and similar state and federal legislation. Their actions have left the public at risk and state and federal governments saddled with the responsibility and cost of cleaning up contaminated sites (2,3). In this article, we discuss how the Bankruptcy Code has been used by corporations faced with massive liability for illnesses caused by their products and by companies faced with substantial hazardous waste clean-up costs. In both cases, the corporations and individuals seeking shelter under the Bankruptcy Code have attempted to reduce the costs to them and their creditors of public health disasters. As a consequence, these costs may be shifted to the injured parties and to the public at large. In addition, "public health bankruptcy" reduces the ability of our liability laws and of toxic waste legislation to encourage socially responsible behavior..We conclude with a discussion of the actions we can take to minimize the impact of bankruptcy on our ability to protect public health and the environment. "The Bankruptcy Code has been used by corporations faced with massive liability for illnesses caused by their products and by companies faced with substantial hazardous waste clean-up costs. In both cases, the corporations and individuals seeking shelter under the Code have attempted to reduce the costs to them and their creditors of public health disasters. As a consequence, these costs may be shifted to the injured parties and to the public at large." S ince 1982,no less than seven asbestos manufacturers (Manville, Amatex, UNR Industries, Forty-Eight Industries, Raymark, Pacor and Nicolet), one pharmaceutical manufacturer (AH. Robins), one manufacturer of swimming pool slides (Aquaslide 'n' Dive), and two companies involved in the spraying of dioxincontaminated oil (at Times Beach, Missouri) have filed voluntary petitions seeking reorganization under Chapter 11 of the 1978Bankruptcy Reform Act. (1) Normally, Chapter 11 protects companies from commercial liabilities exceeding their assets and cash flow insufficient to meet their obligations. However, several of these bankruptcies were filed by solvent companies to protect themselves from potential liability suits for illnesses and injuries caused by hazardous products or wastes the companies manufactured or released into the environment. Other companies and individuals who own or operate hazardous waste facilities also have declared bankruptcy because they were faced with substantial clean-up costs imposed by the Resource
What problem does this paper attempt to address?