Carbohydrate intolerance in children and adolescents with Turner syndrome.

Constantin Polychronakos,Jacques Letarte,R. Collu,J. Ducharme

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3476(80)80627-5

IF: 2.99

1980-06-01

Jornal de Pediatria

Abstract:

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Bi-criteria Pareto optimization to balance irradiation time and dosimetric objectives in proton arc therapy

Sophie Wuyckens,Lewei Zhao,Michael Saint-Guillain,Guillaume Janssens,Edmond Sterpin,Kevin Souris,Xuanfeng Ding,John A Lee

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/aca5e9

2022-12-13

Abstract:Objective. Proton arc therapy (PAT) is a new delivery technique that exploits the continuous rotation of the gantry to distribute the therapeutic dose over many angular windows instead of using a few static fields, as in conventional (intensity-modulated) proton therapy. Although coming along with many potential clinical and dosimetric benefits, PAT has also raised a new optimization challenge. In addition to the dosimetric goals, the beam delivery time (BDT) needs to be considered in the objective function. Considering this bi-objective formulation, the task of finding a good compromise with appropriate weighting factors can turn out to be cumbersome.Approach. We have computed Pareto-optimal plans for three disease sites: a brain, a lung, and a liver, following a method of iteratively choosing weight vectors to approximate the Pareto front with few points. Mixed-integer programming (MIP) was selected to state the bi-criteria PAT problem and to find Pareto optimal points with a suited solver.Main results. The trade-offs between plan quality and beam irradiation time (staticBDT) are investigated by inspecting three plans from the Pareto front. The latter are carefully picked to demonstrate significant differences in dose distribution and delivery time depending on their location on the frontier. The results were benchmarked against IMPT and SPArc plans showing the strength of degrees of freedom coming along with MIP optimization.Significance. This paper presents for the first time the application of bi-criteria optimization to the PAT problem, which eventually permits the planners to select the best treatment strategy according to the patient conditions and clinical resources available.
A novel planning framework for efficient spot-scanning proton arc therapy via particle swarm optimization (SPArc-particle swarm)

Yujia Qian,Qingkun Fan,Riao Dao,Xiaoqiang Li,Zhijian Yang,Sheng Zhang,Kunyu Yang,Hong Quan,Biao Tu,Xuanfeng Ding,Gang Liu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/ad11a4

2023-12-22

Abstract:Objective.Delivery efficiency is the bottleneck of spot-scanning proton arc therapy (SPArc) because of the numerous energy layers (ELs) ascending switches. This study aims to develop a new algorithm to mitigate the need for EL ascending via water equivalent thickness (WET) sector selection followed by particle swarm optimization (SPArc-particle swarm).Approach.SPArc-particle swarmdivided the full arc trajectory into the optimal sectors based on K-means clustering analysis of the relative mean WET. Within the sector, particle swarm optimization was used to minimize the total energy switch time, optimizing the energy selection integrated with the EL delivery sequence and relationship. This novel planning framework was implemented on the open-source platform matRad (Department of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center-DKFZ). Three representative cases (brain, liver, and prostate cancer) were selected for testing purposes. Two kinds of plans were generated: SPArc_seq and SPArc-particle swarm. The plan quality and delivery efficiency were evaluated.Main results. With a similar plan quality, the delivery efficiency was significantly improved using SPArc-particle swarmcompared to SPArc_seq. More specifically, it reduces the number of ELs ascending switching compared to the SPArc_seq (from 21 to 7 in the brain, from 21 to 5 in the prostate, from 21 to 6 in the liver), leading to a 16%-26% reduction of the beam delivery time (BDT) in the SPArc treatment.Significance. A novel planning framework, SPArc-particle swarm, could significantly improve the delivery efficiency, which paves the roadmap towards routine clinical implementation.
Proton arc therapy plan optimization with energy layer pre-selection driven by organ at risk sparing and delivery time

S. Wuyckens,G. Janssens,M. Chocan Vera,J. Sundstrom,D. Di Perri,E. Sterpin,K. Souris,J. A. Lee

2024-10-10

Abstract:Objective. As proton arc therapy (PAT) approaches clinical implementation, optimizing treatment plans for this innovative delivery modality remains challenging, especially in addressing arc delivery time. Existing algorithms for minimizing delivery time are either optimal but computationally demanding or fast but at the expense of sacrificing many degrees of freedom. In this study, we introduce a flexible method for pre-selecting energy layers (EL) in PAT treatment planning before the actual robust spot weight optimization. Our EL pre-selection method employs metaheuristics to minimize a bi-objective function, considering a dynamic delivery time proxy and tumor geometrical coverage penalized as a function of selected organs-at-risk crossing. It is capable of parallelizing multiple instances of the problem. We evaluate the method using three different treatment sites, providing a comprehensive dosimetric analysis benchmarked against dynamic proton arc plans generated with early energy layer selection and spot assignment (ELSA) and IMPT plans in RayStation TPS. The algorithm efficiently generates Pareto-optimal EL pre-selections in approximately 5 minutes. Subsequent PAT treatment plans derived from these selections and optimized within the TPS, demonstrate high-quality target coverage, achieving a high conformity index, and effective sparing of organs at risk. These plans meet clinical goals while achieving a 20 to 40% reduction in delivery time compared to ELSA plans. The proposed algorithm offers speed and efficiency, producing high-quality PAT plans by placing proton arc sectors to efficiently reduce delivery time while maintaining good target coverage and healthy tissues sparing.

Medical Physics
Basic mechanism of hypersensitivity reactions.

R. Sanyal,M. Dave

Indian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology

Abstract:
First direct machine‐specific parameters incorporated in Spot‐scanning Proton Arc (SPArc) optimization algorithm

Gang Liu,Qingkun Fan,Lewei Zhao,Peilin Liu,Xiaoda Cong,Di Yan,Xiaoqiang Li,Xuanfeng Ding

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.16985

IF: 4.506

2024-02-11

Medical Physics

Abstract:Background Spot‐scanning Proton Arc (SPArc) has been of significant interest in recent years because of its superior plan quality. Currently, the primary focus of research and development is on deliverability and treatment efficiency. Purpose To address the challenges in generating a deliverable and efficient SPArc plan for a proton therapy system with a massive gantry, we developed a novel SPArc optimization algorithm (SPArcDMPO) by directly incorporating the machine‐specific parameters such as gantry mechanical constraints and proton delivery sequence. Methods SPArc delivery sequence model (DSMarc) was built based on the machine‐specific parameters of the prototype arc delivery system, IBA ProteusONE®, including mechanical constraint (maximum gantry speed, acceleration, and deceleration) and proton delivery sequence (energy and spot delivery sequence, and irradiation time). SPArcDMPO resamples and adjusts each control point's delivery speed based on the DSMarc calculation through the iterative approach. In SPArcDMPO, users could set a reasonable arc delivery time during the plan optimization, which aims to minimize the gantry momentum changes and improve the delivery efficiency. Ten cases were selected to test SPArcDMPO. Two kinds of SPArc plans were generated using the same planning objective functions: (1) original SPArc plan (SPArcoriginal); (2) SPArcDMPO plan with a user‐pre‐defined delivery time. Additionally, arc delivery sequence was simulated based on the DSMarc and was compared. Treatment delivery time was compared between SPArcoriginal and SPArcDMPO. Dynamic arc delivery time, the static irradiation time, and its corresponding time differential (time differential = dynamic arc delivery time—static irradiation time) were analyzed, respectively. The total gantry velocity change was accumulated throughout the treatment delivery. Results With a similar plan quality, objective value, number of energy layers, and spots, both SPArcoriginal and SPArcDMPO plans could be delivered continuously within the ± 1 degree tolerance window. However, compared to the SPArcoriginal, the strategy of SPArcDMPO is able to reduce the time differential from 30.55 ± 11.42%(90 ± 32 s) to 14.67 ± 6.97%(42 ± 20 s), p

radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging
Efficient proton arc optimization and delivery through energy layer pre-selection and post-filtering

S. Wuyckens,V. Wase,O.Marthin,J. Sundström,G. Janssens,E. Borderias-Villarroel,K. Souris,E. Sterpin,E. Engwall,J. A. Lee

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.17127

2024-10-09

Abstract:Proton arc therapy (PAT) has emerged as a promising approach for improving dose distribution, but also enabling simpler and faster treatment delivery in comparison to conventional proton treatments. However, the delivery speed achievable in proton arc relies on dedicated algorithms, which currently do not generate plans with a clear speed-up and sometimes even result in increased delivery time. This study aims to address the challenge of minimizing delivery time through a hybrid method combining a fast geometry-based energy layer (EL) pre-selection with a dose-based EL filtering. Three methods of EL filtering were developed; The unrestricted method filters the lowest weighted EL while the SU gap filtering removes the EL around a new SU to minimize the gantry rotation braking. The SU filtering removes the lowest weighted group of EL that includes a SU. These filters were combined with the RayStation dynamic proton arc optimization framework (ELSA). Four bilateral oropharyngeal and four lung cancer patients' data were used for evaluation. Objective function values, target coverage robustness, organ-at-risk doses and NTCP evaluations, as well as comparisons to IMPT plans, were used to assess plan quality. The SU gap filtering algorithm performed best in five out of the eight cases, maintaining plan quality within tolerance while reducing beam delivery time, in particular for the oropharyngeal cohort. It achieved up to approximately 22% and 15% reduction in delivery time for oropharyngeal and lung treatment sites, respectively. The unrestricted filtering algorithm followed closely. In contrast, the SU filtering showed limited improvement, suppressing one or two SU without substantial delivery time shortening. Robust target coverage was kept within 1% of variation compared to the PAT baseline plan while organs-at-risk doses slightly decreased or kept about the same for all patients.

Medical Physics
Efficient proton arc optimization and delivery through energy layer pre‐selection and post‐filtering

Sophie Wuyckens,Viktor Wase,Otte Marthin,Johan Sundström,Guillaume Janssens,Elena Borderias‐Villarroel,Kevin Souris,Edmond Sterpin,Erik Engwall,John A. Lee

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.17127

IF: 4.506

2024-05-16

Medical Physics

Abstract:Background Proton arc therapy (PAT) has emerged as a promising approach for improving dose distribution, but also enabling simpler and faster treatment delivery in comparison to conventional proton treatments. However, the delivery speed achievable in proton arc relies on dedicated algorithms, which currently do not generate plans with a clear speed‐up and sometimes even result in increased delivery time. Purpose This study aims to address the challenge of minimizing delivery time through a hybrid method combining a fast geometry‐based energy layer (EL) pre‐selection with a dose‐based EL filtering, and comparing its performance to a baseline approach without filtering. Methods Three methods of EL filtering were developed: unrestricted, switch‐up (SU), and switch‐up gap (SU gap) filtering. The unrestricted method filters the lowest weighted EL while the SU gap filtering removes the EL around a new SU to minimize the gantry rotation braking. The SU filtering removes the lowest weighted group of EL that includes a SU. These filters were combined with the RayStation dynamic proton arc optimization framework energy layer selection and spot assignment (ELSA). Four bilateral oropharyngeal and four lung cancer patients' data were used for evaluation. Objective function values, target coverage robustness, organ‐at‐risk doses and normal tissue complication probability evaluations, as well as comparisons to intensity‐modulated proton therapy (IMPT) plans, were used to assess plan quality. Results The SU gap filtering algorithm performed best in five out of the eight cases, maintaining plan quality within tolerance while reducing beam delivery time, in particular for the oropharyngeal cohort. It achieved up to approximately 22% and 15% reduction in delivery time for oropharyngeal and lung treatment sites, respectively. The unrestricted filtering algorithm followed closely. In contrast, the SU filtering showed limited improvement, suppressing one or two SU without substantial delivery time shortening. Robust target coverage was kept within 1% of variation compared to the PAT baseline plan while organs‐at‐risk doses slightly decreased or kept about the same for all patients. Conclusions This study provides insights to accelerate PAT delivery without compromising plan quality. These advancements could enhance treatment efficiency and patient throughput.

radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging
Including robustness in multi-criteria optimization for intensity-modulated proton therapy

Wei Chen,Jan Unkelbach,Alexei Trofimov,Thomas Madden,Hanne Kooy,Thomas Bortfeld,David Craft

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/57/3/591

2011-12-23

Abstract:We present a method to include robustness into a multi-criteria optimization (MCO) framework for intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT). The approach allows one to simultaneously explore the trade-off between different objectives as well as the trade-off between robustness and nominal plan quality. In MCO, a database of plans each emphasizing different treatment planning objectives, is pre-computed to approximate the Pareto surface. An IMPT treatment plan that strikes the best balance between the different objectives can be selected by navigating on the Pareto surface. In our approach, robustness is integrated into MCO by adding robustified objectives and constraints to the MCO problem. Uncertainties of the robust problem are modeled by pre-calculated dose-influence matrices for a nominal scenario and a number of pre-defined error scenarios. A robustified objective represents the worst objective function value that can be realized for any of the error scenarios. The optimization method is based on a linear projection solver and is capable of handling large problem sizes resulting from a fine dose grid resolution, many scenarios, and a large number of proton pencil beams. A base-of-skull case is used to demonstrate the robust optimization method. It is demonstrated that the robust optimizationmethod reduces the sensitivity of the treatment plan to setup and range errors to a degree that is not achieved by a safety margin approach. A chordoma case is analyzed in more detail to demonstrate the involved tradeoffs between target underdose and brainstem sparing as well as robustness and nominal plan quality. The latter illustrates the advantage of MCO in the context of robust planning. For all cases examined, the robust optimization for each Pareto optimal plan takes less than 5 min on a standard computer, making a computationally friendly interface possible to the planner.

Medical Physics,Optimization and Control
A novel fast robust optimization algorithm for intensity-modulated proton therapy with minimum monitor unit constraint

Qingkun Fan,Lewei Zhao,Xiaoqiang Li,Jie Hu,Xiliang Lu,Zhijian Yang,Sheng Zhang,Kunyu Yang,Xuanfeng Ding,Gang Liu,Shuyang Dai

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.17285

2024-07-05

Abstract:Background: Intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) optimizes spot intensities and position, providing better conformability. However, the successful application of IMPT is dependent upon addressing the challenges posed by range and setup uncertainties. In order to address the uncertainties in IMPT, robust optimization is essential. Purpose: This study aims to develop a novel fast algorithm for robust optimization of IMPT with minimum monitor unit (MU) constraint. Methods and materials: The study formulates a robust optimization problem and proposes a novel, fast algorithm based on the alternating direction method of multipliers (ADMM) framework. This algorithm enables distributed computation and parallel processing. Ten clinical cases were used as test scenarios to evaluate the performance of the proposed approach. The robust optimization method (RBO-NEW) was compared with plans that only consider nominal optimization using CTV (NMO-CTV) without handling uncertainties and PTV (NMO-PTV) to handle the uncertainties, as well as with conventional robust-optimized plans (RBO-CONV). Dosimetric metrics, including D95, homogeneity index, and Dmean, were used to evaluate the dose distribution quality. The area under the root-mean-square dose (RMSD)-volume histogram curves (AUC) and dose-volume histogram (DVH) bands were used to evaluate the robustness of the treatment plan. Optimization time cost was also assessed to measure computational efficiency. Results: The results demonstrated that the RBO plans exhibited better plan quality and robustness than the NMO plans, with RBO-NEW showing superior computational efficiency and plan quality compared to RBO-CONV. Specifically, statistical analysis results indicated that RBO-NEW was able to reduce the computational time from 389.70 ± 207.40 $389.70\pm 207.40$ to 228.60 ± 123.67 $228.60\pm 123.67$ s ( p < 0.01 $p<0.01$ ) and reduce the mean organ-at-risk (OAR) dose from 9.38 ± 12.80 $9.38\pm 12.80$ % of the prescription dose to 9.07 ± 12.39 $9.07\pm 12.39$ % of the prescription dose ( p < 0.05 $p<0.05$ ) compared to RBO-CONV. Conclusion: This study introduces a novel fast robust optimization algorithm for IMPT treatment planning with minimum MU constraint. Such an algorithm is not only able to enhance the plan's robustness and computational efficiency without compromising OAR sparing but also able to improve treatment plan quality and reliability.
Technical note: Optimizing spot‐scanning proton arc therapy with a novel spot sparsity approach

Qingkun Fan,Lewei Zhao,Xiaoqiang Li,Yujia Qian,Riao Dao,Jie Hu,Sheng Zhang,Kunyu Yang,Xiliang Lu,Zhijian Yang,Xuanfeng Ding,Shuyang Dai,Gang Liu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.17517

IF: 4.506

2024-11-22

Medical Physics

Abstract:Background One of the main challenges of utilizing spot‐scanning proton arc therapy (SPArc) in routine clinics is treatment delivery efficiency. Spot reduction, which relies on spot sparsity optimization (SSO), is crucial for achieving high delivery efficiency in SPArc. Purpose This study aims to develop a novel SSO approach based on the alternating directions method of multipliers (ADMM) for SPArc to achieve high treatment delivery efficiency and maintain optimal dosimetric plan quality. Methods In this study, SSO for SPArc is based on the least‐square dose fidelity term with L0‐norm regularization. The novel optimization approach is based on the ADMM framework, in which the minimum monitor unit constraint was considered to improve the plan quality. A state‐of‐the‐art SSO method, the primal‐dual active set with continuation (PDASC) algorithm published previously, was utilized as a benchmark. Two SPArc plan groups with the same beam assignment and clinical constraint were generated, in which the former group was SPArc plan with SSO utilizing ADMM, denoted as SPArcADMM , and the later group was SPArc with SSO utilizing PDASC, denoted as SPArcPDASC . Nine clinical cases included five different cancer sites (brain, lung, liver, prostate, and head&neck cancer) were used. The SSO method's performance was evaluated in terms of spot sparsity level (the number of zero‐valued elements divided by the total number of elements), beam delivery time, dosimetric plan quality, and plan robustness. Results Compared to the SPArcPDASC plan, the SPArcADMM plan exhibits superior sparsity and higher delivery efficiency while maintaining good plan quality. Conclusions This study introduces a novel spot sparsity optimization approach using the ADMM framework to improve the delivery efficiency of SPArc. Compared to the existing state‐of‐the‐art SSO method, such an approach could further enhance delivery efficiency while maintaining good plan quality, which could promote the implementation of SPArc in the clinic's.

radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging
Proton ARC based LATTICE radiation therapy: feasibility study, energy layer optimization and LET optimization

Ya-Nan Zhu,Weijie Zhang,Jufri Setianegara,Yuting Lin,Erik Traneus,Yong Long,Xiaoqun Zhang,Rajeev Badkul,David Akhavan,Fen Wang,Ronald C Chen,Hao Gao

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/ad8855

IF: 3.5

2024-10-18

Physics in Medicine and Biology

Abstract:Objective: This work will develop novel proton LATTICE method via proton ARC (with many beam angles) to overcome these challenges in target coverage and OAR sparing, with optimized delivery efficiency via energy layer optimization and optimized biological dose distribution via LET optimization, to enable the clinical use of proton LATTICE. Approach: ARC based proton LATTICE is formulated and solved with energy layer optimization, during which plan quality and delivery efficiency are jointly optimized. In particular, the number of energy jumps (NEJ) is explicitly modelled and minimized during plan optimization for improving delivery efficiency, while target dose conformality and OAR dose objectives are optimized. The plan deliverability is ensured by considering the minimum-monitor-unit (MMU) constraint, and the plan robustness is accounted for using robust optimization. The biological dose is optimized via LET optimization. The optimization solution algorithm utilizes iterative convex relaxation method to handle the dose-volume constraint and the MMU constraint, with spot-weight optimization subproblems solved by proximal descent method. Main results: ARC based proton LATTCE substantially improved plan quality from IMPT based proton LATTICE. Energy layer optimization improved plan delivery efficiency for ARC based proton LATTICE. Significance: The feasibility of high-plan-quality proton LATTICE is demonstrated via proton ARC with substantially improved target dose coverage and OAR sparing compared to IMPT, while the plan delivery efficiency for ARC based proton LATTICE can be optimized using energy layer optimization

engineering, biomedical,radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging
Treatment Planning for Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy: Model and Heuristic Algorithms

Jie Song,Zhongshun Shi,Bofei Sun,Leyuan Shi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/tase.2014.2360530

IF: 6.636

2015-01-01

IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering

Abstract:In this paper, we study the radiation treatment planning optimization for Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT). A nonlinear mixed integer programming model is formulated, then the linearization technique is used, and the resulting mixed integer programming model is solved by a heuristic approach based on the Nested-Partitions framework. The approach partitions the feasible region iteratively and constructs a feasible solution by solving the LP relaxation of the original problem. We design two partition strategies: partition by column and expansion from center of aperture. Numerical results with clinical cases show the efficiency of the proposed model and algorithm.
A Two-Stage Sequential Linear Programming Approach to Imrt Dose Optimization

Hao H. Zhang,Robert R. Meyer,Jianzhou Wu,Shahid A. Naqvi,Leyuan Shi,Warren D. D'Souza

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/55/3/022

IF: 3.5

2010-01-01

Physics in Medicine and Biology

Abstract:The conventional IMRT planning process involves two stages in which the first stage consists of fast but approximate idealized pencil beam dose calculations and dose optimization and the second stage consists of discretization of the intensity maps followed by intensity map segmentation and a more accurate final dose calculation corresponding to physical beam apertures. Consequently, there can be differences between the presumed dose distribution corresponding to pencil beam calculations and optimization and a more accurately computed dose distribution corresponding to beam segments that takes into account collimator-specific effects. IMRT optimization is computationally expensive and has therefore led to the use of heuristic (e.g., simulated annealing and genetic algorithms) approaches that do not encompass a global view of the solution space. We modify the traditional two-stage IMRT optimization process by augmenting the second stage via an accurate Monte Carlo-based kernel-superposition dose calculations corresponding to beam apertures combined with an exact mathematical programming-based sequential optimization approach that uses linear programming (SLP). Our approach was tested on three challenging clinical test cases with multileaf collimator constraints corresponding to two vendors. We compared our approach to the conventional IMRT planning approach, a direct-aperture approach and a segment weight optimization approach. Our results in all three cases indicate that the SLP approach outperformed the other approaches, achieving superior critical structure sparing. Convergence of our approach is also demonstrated. Finally, our approach has also been integrated with a commercial treatment planning system and may be utilized clinically.
Treatment plan comparison of Linac step and shoot,Tomotherapy, RapidArc, and Proton therapy for prostate cancer using dosimetrical and biological index

Suk Lee,Yuan Jie Cao,Kyung Hwan Chang,Jang Bo Shim,Kwang Hyeon Kim,Nam Kwon Lee,Young Je Park,Chul Yong Kim,Sam Ju Cho,Sang Hoon Lee,Chul Kee Min,Woo Chul Kim,Kwang Hwan Cho,Hyun Do Huh,Sangwook Lim,Dongho Shin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1503.03558

2015-03-12

Abstract:The purpose of this study was to use various dosimetrical indices to determine the best IMRT modality technique for treating patients with prostate cancer. Ten patients with prostate cancer were included in this study. Intensity modulated radiation therapy plans were designed to include different modalities, including the linac step and shoot, Tomotherapy, RapidArc, and Proton systems. Various dosimetrical indices, like the prescription isodose to target volume (PITV) ratio, conformity index (CI), homogeneity index (HI), target coverage index (TCI), modified dose homogeneity index (MHI), conformation number (CN), critical organ scoring index (COSI), and quality factor (QF) were determined to compare the different treatment plans. Biological indices such as the generalized equivalent uniform dose (gEUD), based tumor control probability (TCP), and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) were also calculated and used to compare the treatment plans. The RapidArc plan attained better PTV coverage, as evidenced by its superior PITV, CI, TCI, MHI, and CN values. Regarding OARs, proton therapy exhibited superior dose sparing for the rectum and bowel in low dose volumes, whereas the Tomotherapy and RapidArc plans achieved better dose sparing in high dose volumes. The QF scores showed no significant difference among these plans (p=0.701). The average TCPs for prostate tumors in the RapidArc, Linac, and Proton plans were higher than the average TCP for Tomotherapy (98.79%, 98.76%, and 98.75% vs. 98.70%, respectively). Regarding the rectum NTCP, RapidArc showed the most favorable result (0.09%), whereas Linac resulted in the best bladder NTCP (0.08%).

Medical Physics
Comparing Optimization Methods for Radiation Therapy Patient Scheduling using Different Objectives

Sara Frimodig,Per Enqvist,Mats Carlsson,Carole Mercier

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43069-023-00251-2

2023-10-24

Operations Research Forum

Abstract:Abstract Radiation therapy (RT) is a medical treatment to kill cancer cells or shrink tumors. To manually schedule patients for RT is a time-consuming and challenging task. By the use of optimization, patient schedules for RT can be created automatically. This paper presents a study of different optimization methods for modeling and solving the RT patient scheduling problem, which can be used as decision support when implementing an automatic scheduling algorithm in practice. We introduce an Integer Programming (IP) model, a column generation IP model (CG-IP), and a Constraint Programming model. Patients are scheduled on multiple machine types considering their priority for treatment, session duration and allowed machines. Expected future arrivals of urgent patients are included in the models as placeholder patients. Since different cancer centers can have different scheduling objectives, the models are compared using multiple objective functions, including minimizing waiting times, and maximizing the fulfillment of patients’ preferences for treatment times. The test data is generated from historical data from Iridium Netwerk, Belgium’s largest cancer center with 10 linear accelerators. The results demonstrate that the CG-IP model can solve all the different problem instances to a mean optimality gap of less than $$1\%$$ 1 % within one hour. The proposed methodology provides a tool for automated scheduling of RT treatments and can be generally applied to RT centers.
A reference-point-method-based online proton treatment plan re-optimization strategy and a novel solution to planning constraint infeasibility problem

Zihang Qiu,Nicolas Depauw,Bram L Gorissen,Thomas Madden,Ali Ajdari,Dick den Hertog,Thomas R Bortfeld

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/ad4a00

IF: 3.5

2024-05-13

Physics in Medicine and Biology

Abstract:Objective: Propose a highly automated treatment plan re-optimization strategy suitable for online adaptive proton therapy. The strategy includes a rapid re-optimization method that generates quality replans and a novel solution that efficiently addresses the planning constraint infeasibility issue that can significantly prolong the re-optimization process. Approach: We propose a systematic reference point method (RPM) model that minimizes the l-infinity norm from the initial treatment plan in the daily objective space for online re-optimization. This model minimizes the largest objective value deviation among the objectives of the daily replan from their reference values, leading to a daily replan similar to the initial plan. Whether a set of planning constraints is feasible with respect to the daily anatomy cannot be known before solving the corresponding optimization problem. The conventional trial-and-error-based relaxation process can cost a significant amount of time. To that end, we propose an optimization problem that first estimates the magnitude of daily violation of each planning constraint. Guided by the violation magnitude and clinical importance of the constraints, the constraints are then iteratively converted into objectives based on their priority until the infeasibility issue is solved. Main result: The proposed RPM-based strategy generated replans similar to the offline manual replans within the online time requirement for six head and neck and four breast patients. The average target and relevant organ at risk sparing parameter differences between the RPM replans and clinical offline replans were -0.23, -1.62 Gy for head and neck cases and 0.29, -0.39 Gy for breast cases. The proposed constraint relaxation solution made the RPM problem feasible after one round of relaxation for all four patients who encountered the infeasibility issue. Significance: We proposed a novel RPM-based re-optimization strategy and demonstrated its effectiveness on complex cases, regardless of whether constraint infeasibility is encountered.

engineering, biomedical,radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging
The proton arc therapy treatment planning problem is NP -Hard

Viktor Wase,Sophie Wuyckens,John A Lee,Michael Saint-Guillain,John A. Lee

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2024.108139

IF: 7.7

2024-02-23

Computers in Biology and Medicine

Abstract:Proton arc therapy (PAT) is an advanced radiotherapy technique using charged particles in which the radiation device rotates continuously around the patient while irradiating the tumor. Compared to conventional, fixed-angle beam delivery mode, proton arc therapy has the potential to further improve the quality of cancer treatment by delivering accurate radiation dose to tumors while minimizing damage to surrounding healthy tissues. However, the computational complexity of treatment planning in PAT raises challenges as to its effective implementation. In this paper, we demonstrate that designing a PAT plan through algorithmic methods is a NP-hard problem (in fact, NP-complete), where the problem size is determined by the number of discrete irradiation angles from which the radiation can be delivered. This finding highlights the inherent complexity of PAT treatment planning and emphasizes the need for efficient algorithms and heuristics to address the challenges associated with optimizing the delivery of radiation doses in this context.

engineering, biomedical,computer science, interdisciplinary applications,mathematical & computational biology,biology
Atlas-based Dose Optimization Via Linear Programming for IMRT Using a High-throughput Computing Environment

H. H. Zhang,R. R. Meyer,S. A. Naqvi,L. Shi,W. D. D'Souza

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.07.246

2010-01-01

Abstract:To develop and evaluate an atlas-based dose optimization (DO) scheme using linear programming (LP) for disease site specific IMRT treatment planning using a high-throughput computing environment (HTC). Ten locally advanced head and neck cases were retrospectively selected for this study. The treatment targets involved primary tumor, high risk and low risk nodal volumes. Organs-at-risk (OARs) included both parotids and the spinal cord. Seven-beam IMRT plans were generated using the Pinnacle3 planning system. More than 2000 apertures from these 10 cases were extracted (on average 30 apertures per beam per case). These apertures served as the basis for the atlas from which prospective case-specific apertures were derived. Aperture-based 3D dose distributions were calculated in parallel using Monte Carlo-based Kernel Superposition (MCKS) and facilitated using Condor in the HTC environment consisting of 48 2.26GHz CPUs. Condor provided the job queuing mechanism, priority scheme, resource monitoring, and resource management. Aperture weights of each case were optimized via an in-house developed sequential linear program (SLP) DO approach. The SLP approach involved solving the DO problem by dividing the problem into sub-problems (due to the size of the DO problem), each of which was solved using LP while maintaining a global view of the full problem. Our approach was compared with three approaches: conventional IMRT, two-arc intensity-modulated arc therapy (IMAT) (generated using Pinnacle SmartArc 9.0) and SLP corresponding to apertures derived from the conventional IMRT plans for the specific case. Approximately 200 apertures per case were returned with non-zero weight assignments via the atlas-based SLP scheme and 40% of the selected atlas apertures were from other cases. Superior plan quality was achieved with atlas-based plans. On average, at dose constraint levels parotid gland sparing improved 30% (±7%), 31% (±9%) and 18% (±5%), respectively using the atlas-based DO scheme compared with conventional IMRT, two-arc IMAT and the SLP scheme using apertures derived from the conventional IMRT plans. The improvement in the maximum dose to the spinal cord was 10% (±4%), 20% (±6%) and 6% (±2%), respectively when compared with the other three approaches. t-test results showed that these improvements were significant (p < 0.001). Dose homogeneity for all PTVs (tumor and nodes) was higher for the atlas-based plans compared with the other approaches. The atlas-based approach also resulted in lower integral dose to non-PTV and non-OAR tissues. Our results suggest that atlas-based DO using the SLP approach results in superior plan quality compared with conventional IMRT and IMAT.
A New Approach to Integrate GPU-based Monte Carlo Simulation into Inverse Treatment Plan Optimization for Proton Therapy.

Yongbao Li,Zhen Tian,Ting Song,Zhaoxia Wu,Yaqiang Liu,Steve Jiang,Xun Jia

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/62/1/289

IF: 3.5

2016-01-01

Physics in Medicine and Biology

Abstract:Monte Carlo (MC)-based spot dose calculation is highly desired for inverse treatment planning in proton therapy because of its accuracy. Recent studies on biological optimization have also indicated the use of MC methods to compute relevant quantities of interest, e.g. linear energy transfer. Although GPU-based MC engines have been developed to address inverse optimization problems, their efficiency still needs to be improved. Also, the use of a large number of GPUs in MC calculation is not favorable for clinical applications. The previously proposed adaptive particle sampling (APS) method can improve the efficiency of MC-based inverse optimization by using the computationally expensive MC simulation more effectively. This method is more efficient than the conventional approach that performs spot dose calculation and optimization in two sequential steps. In this paper, we propose a computational library to perform MC-based spot dose calculation on GPU with the APS scheme. The implemented APS method performs a non-uniform sampling of the particles from pencil beam spots during the optimization process, favoring those from the high intensity spots. The library also conducts two computationally intensive matrix-vector operations frequently used when solving an optimization problem. This library design allows a streamlined integration of the MC-based spot dose calculation into an existing proton therapy inverse planning process. We tested the developed library in a typical inverse optimization system with four patient cases. The library achieved the targeted functions by supporting inverse planning in various proton therapy schemes, e.g. single field uniform dose, 3D intensity modulated proton therapy, and distal edge tracking. The efficiency was 41.6 +/- 15.3% higher than the use of a GPU-based MC package in a conventional calculation scheme. The total computation time ranged between 2 and 50 min on a single GPU card depending on the problem size.
Ultra-fast treatment plan optimization for volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT)

Chunhua Men,H. Edwin Romeijn,Xun Jia,Steve B. Jiang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1118/1.3491675

2010-05-25

Abstract:Purpose: To develop a novel aperture-based algorithm for volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) treatment plan optimization with high quality and high efficiency. Methods: The VMAT optimization problem is formulated as a large-scale convex programming problem solved by a column generation approach. We consider a cost function consisting two terms, the first which enforces a desired dose distribution while the second guarantees a smooth dose rate variation between successive gantry angles. At each iteration of the column generation method, a subproblem is first solved to generate one more deliverable MLC aperture which potentially decreases the cost function most effectively. A subsequent master problem is then solved to determine the dose rate at all currently generated apertures by minimizing the cost function. The iteration of such an algorithm yields a set of deliverable apertures, as well as dose rates, at all gantry angles. Results: The algorithm was preliminarily tested on five prostate and five head-and-neck clinical cases, each with one full gantry rotation and without any couch/collimator rotations. Compared to corresponding co-planar IMRT treatment plans (9 fields for prostate cases and 5 fields for head-and-neck cases), the VMAT plans delivered much lower doses to critical structures and more conformal doses to targets. Moreover, extremely high efficiency has been achieved in our algorithm. It takes only 5~8 minutes on CPU (MATLAB code on an Intel Xeon 2.27 GHz CPU) and 18~31 seconds on GPU (CUDA code on an NVIDIA Tesla C1060 GPU card) to generate such a plan. Conclusions: We have developed an aperture-based VMAT optimization algorithm which can generate clinically deliverable and high quality treatment plans at very high efficiency.

Medical Physics

Carbohydrate intolerance in children and adolescents with Turner syndrome.

Bi-criteria Pareto optimization to balance irradiation time and dosimetric objectives in proton arc therapy

A novel planning framework for efficient spot-scanning proton arc therapy via particle swarm optimization (SPArc-particle swarm)

Proton arc therapy plan optimization with energy layer pre-selection driven by organ at risk sparing and delivery time

Basic mechanism of hypersensitivity reactions.

First direct machine‐specific parameters incorporated in Spot‐scanning Proton Arc (SPArc) optimization algorithm

Efficient proton arc optimization and delivery through energy layer pre-selection and post-filtering

Efficient proton arc optimization and delivery through energy layer pre‐selection and post‐filtering

Including robustness in multi-criteria optimization for intensity-modulated proton therapy

A novel fast robust optimization algorithm for intensity-modulated proton therapy with minimum monitor unit constraint

Technical note: Optimizing spot‐scanning proton arc therapy with a novel spot sparsity approach

Proton ARC based LATTICE radiation therapy: feasibility study, energy layer optimization and LET optimization

Treatment Planning for Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy: Model and Heuristic Algorithms

A Two-Stage Sequential Linear Programming Approach to Imrt Dose Optimization

Treatment plan comparison of Linac step and shoot,Tomotherapy, RapidArc, and Proton therapy for prostate cancer using dosimetrical and biological index

Comparing Optimization Methods for Radiation Therapy Patient Scheduling using Different Objectives

A reference-point-method-based online proton treatment plan re-optimization strategy and a novel solution to planning constraint infeasibility problem

The proton arc therapy treatment planning problem is NP -Hard

Atlas-based Dose Optimization Via Linear Programming for IMRT Using a High-throughput Computing Environment

A New Approach to Integrate GPU-based Monte Carlo Simulation into Inverse Treatment Plan Optimization for Proton Therapy.

Ultra-fast treatment plan optimization for volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT)