Validation of the ACSID-11 for consistent screening of specific internet use disorders based on ICD-11 criteria for gaming disorder: A multitrait-multimethod approach

Andreas Oelker,Hans-Jürgen Rumpf,Matthias Brand,Silke M. Müller

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comppsych.2024.152470

IF: 7.211

2024-03-08

Comprehensive Psychiatry

Abstract:Introduction With the inclusion of gaming disorder in the ICD-11, diagnostic criteria were introduced for this relatively new disorder. These criteria may be applied to other potential specific Internet-use disorders. The 11-item Assessment of Criteria for Specific Internet-use Disorders (ACSID-11) was developed for consistent screening of gaming disorder, online buying-shopping disorder, online pornography-use disorder, social networks-use disorder, and online gambling disorder for. This study tested the construct validity of the ACISD-11, including convergent and divergent measures. Methods The ACSID-11 measures five behavioral addictions with the same set of items by following the principles of the Alcohol, Smoking and Substance Involvement Screening Test (ASSIST). The ACSID-11 was administered to a convenience sample of active Internet users ( N = 1597) together with validated and established measures of each specific Internet-use disorder along with screeners for mental health. Included are the Ten-Item Internet Gaming Disorder Test (IGDT-10), the Bergen Shopping Addiction Scale (BSAS), the Problematic Pornography Consumption Scale (PPCS), the Bergen Social Media Addiction Scale (BSMAS) and the Berlin Inventory of Gambling behavior – Screening (BIGS). The ACSID-11 was compared convergently and divergently through a multitrait-multimethod approach along with contingency tables with the other Internet-use disorder screeners. Results The multitrait-multimethod results shows that each behavior assessed with the ACSID-11 has strong correlations (r from 0.462 to 0.609) with the scores of the corresponding established measures as well as moderate correlations (r from 0.179 to 0.434) with measures of psychological distress and further shows that the ACSID-11 can be used for a comprehensive assessment of different behaviors. The contingency tables reveal large divergences between the ACSID-11 and other screening instruments concerning the classification of problematic specific Internet use based on the given cut-off values. Conclusion The current work provides additional validation for the ACSID-11. Accordingly, this tool can be considered as reliable and valid for the simultaneous assessment of different Internet-use disorders: gaming disorder, online buying-shopping disorder, online pornography-use disorder, social networks-use disorder, and online gambling disorder. With a subsequent clinical validation of the scale and the proposed cutoff score, the ACSID-11 will be a thoroughly validated useful screening tool for clinical practice.

psychiatry