Feasibility randomised controlled trial of the Early Adolescent Skills for Emotions psychological intervention with young adolescents in Lebanon
Felicity L Brown,Karine Taha,Frederik Steen,Jeremy Kane,Aviva Gillman,May Aoun,Aiysha Malik,Richard Bryant,Marit Sijbrandij,Rabih El Chammay,Chiara Servili,Mark van Ommeren,Aemal Akhtar,Edwina Zoghbi,EASE Intervention Development, Training Team,Mark J D Jordans,STRENGTHS Consortium,Katie S Dawson,Sarah Watts,Maha Ghatasheh,Ceren Acarturk,Ibrahim Akinçi,Ahmed Bawaneh,Martha Bird,Sebastian Burchert,Pim Cuijpers,Anne de Graaff,Annelieke Drogendijk,Daniela Fuhr,Jonas Maria Hessling,Zeynep Ilkkursun,Christine Knaevelsrud,Gülşah Kurt,David McDaid,Saara Martinmäki,Cansu Mirzanlı,Trudy Mooren,Naser Morina,A-La Park,Monique Pfaltz,Bayard Roberts,Matthis Schick,Ulrich Schnyder,Egbert Sondorp,Julia Spaaij,Peter Ventevogel,Claire Whitney,Nana Wiedemann,Aniek Woodward
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-023-04571-9
IF: 4.144
2023-03-01
BMC Psychiatry
Abstract:Background: Globally, there is a vast mental health treatment gap, whereby the majority of adolescents living in low- and middle-income countries requiring mental health services, do not have access to adequate care. To improve access, the World Health Organization (WHO) developed a range of interventions, designed to be low-cost and delivered by non-specialists. We conducted a two-arm, individually randomised group treatment feasibility trial of a new WHO group intervention for young adolescents with emotional distress ('Early Adolescent Skills for Emotions'; EASE) in Lebanon. Method: The aim of this study was to determine the feasibility of the intervention and study procedures. Adolescents aged 10 to 14 years were eligible to take part if they scored above a validated cut-off on the Child Psychosocial Distress Screener. Participants were randomized to EASE or enhanced treatment as usual (ETAU) control using a 1:1 ratio. EASE consisted of seven group sessions with adolescents and three sessions with caregivers. ETAU consisted of a single brief psychoeducation home visit. Child and caregiver outcomes were measured by blind assessors at baseline, endline (8 weeks post-randomisation), and three month follow-up (20 weeks post-randomisation), with the primary outcome measure being child psychological symptoms on the Pediatric Symptom Checklist. Qualitative interviews were conducted with adolescents (n = 13), caregivers (n = 17), facilitators (n = 6), trainers (n = 3), and outreach staff (n = 1) at endline to assess barriers and facilitators related to the feasibility and delivery of EASE and study procedures. Results: Of 154 adolescents screened, 67 (43%) were eligible, completed baseline, and were randomized. Sixty adolescents (90%) completed endline assessments (31 EASE, 29 ETAU), and fifty-nine (88%) completed three-month assessments (29 EASE, 30 ETAU). Qualitatively, participants provided overall positive feedback about the intervention. Several challenges and suggestions for improvement were raised around logistics, intervention content, and acceptability of assessment measures. Implementation data highlighted challenges with intervention uptake and attendance. Outcome measures generally had strong psychometric properties (range: α = 0.77 to α = 87), however did not demonstrate change over time in either group. Conclusions: The EASE intervention and study procedures are acceptable and feasible for implementation with vulnerable adolescents in Lebanon, however several improvements are necessary prior to full-scale evaluation. Trial registration: #ISRCTN60799626, retrospectively registered on 04/10/2022.