Postoperative tegafur-uracil for stage I lung adenocarcinoma: first real-world data with an exploratory subgroup analysis

Ryo Miyata,Masatsugu Hamaji,Akiyoshi Nakakura,Satoshi Morita,Yumeta Shimazu,Masashi Ishikawa,Hidenao Kayawake,Toshi Menju,Yasuto Sakaguchi,Makoto Sonobe,Mamoru Takahashi,Akihiro Aoyama,Ryota Sumitomo,Cheng-Long Huang,Tomoya Kono,Ryo Miyahara,Akira Matsumoto,Hiromichi Katakura,Takahisa Fukada,Hiroaki Sakai,Masashi Kobayashi,Norihito Okumura,Naoki Date,Takuji Fujinaga,Ei Miyamoto,Tatsuo Nakagawa,Hiroshi Date
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-022-02546-z
Abstract:Purpose: The effect of postoperative tegafur-uracil on overall survival (OS) after resection of stage I adenocarcinoma has been shown in clinical trials. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether findings from randomized trials of adjuvant tegafur-uracil are reproducible in a real-world setting. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was performed using a multi-institutional database that included all patients who underwent complete resection of pathological stage I adenocarcinoma between 2014 and 2016. Survival outcomes for patients managed with and without tegafur-uracil were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and a Cox proportional hazards model for the whole patient cohort and in a selected cohort based on eligibility criteria of a previous randomized trial. Propensity score matching was used to adjust for confounding effects. Results: After propensity score matching, the hazard ratios for OS were 0.57 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.29-1.14, P = 0.11) in the whole cohort and 0.69 (95% CI 0.32-1.50, P = 0.35) in the selected cohort. Conclusions: The effects of tegafur-uracil in this retrospective study appear to be consistent with those found in randomized clinical trials. These effects may be maximized in patients aged from 45 to 75 years.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?