Abstract:Background: One measure to quantify the degree of dysregulation is allostatic load (AL). Typically, AL incorporates information on diverse biomarkers and is associated with health outcomes such as cardiovascular diseases or the incidence of coronary events (C-E).Aims: This study investigates the predictive performance of different AL scoring methods on the incidence of coronary events (C-E). This study also elaborates sex differences in the baseline risks of C-E and the AL associated risks of C-E.Design: Longitudinal data analysis of the Heinz Nixdorf Recall Study (Risk Factors, Evaluation of Coronary Calcification, and Lifestyle) of 4327 participants free of C-E at study baseline aged 45-75. The data contains over 13 biomarkers measuring AL.Methods: After conducting multiple imputations on missing values on AL for 826 participants, the analysis sample consisted of N = 4327 participants. We applied the two most commonly used methods of AL scoring AL (count-based and Z-score) and a recently developed logistic regression weighting method (LRM) approach. Cox regression was used to predict the incidence of C-E for each AL score. Results were estimated without (M0) and with (M1) covariate adjustment, and in a final model (M2), with an interaction between AL and sex.Results: We found no violation of the proportional hazard assumption and significant differences in the survival curves between the sexes for C-E (Log-rank test: prob. > Chi2 = 0.000). In M0, all AL-scoring methods predicted C-E significantly, with the LRM based AL-score having the best performance (hazard ratio = 3.133; CI: [2.630, 3.732]; Somer's D = 0.717). After covariate inclusion, differences between the scoring methods levelled, though the count-based method and LRM performed better than the Z-scoring method. The interaction analysis in M2 showed a significant multiplicative interaction for the count-based method (1.254; [1.066, 1.475]) and for the LRM (1.746; [1.132, 2.692]). The additive relative excess risk due to interaction (RERI) measure was negative for the count-based method (RERI = -1.967; [-3.778; -0.156]) and the LRM (RERI = -1.909 [-3.910; 0.091]), indicating subadditivity.Conclusion: AL scores are suitable for predicting C-E. Differences between the AL-scoring algorithms were only present after including interactions. We value the count-based method as suitable for clinical practice since its calculation is relatively simple, and performance was among the best. Interaction analysis revealed that despite strong sex differences in baseline C-E, the effect of AL is more pronounced for females at high levels of AL; thus, females could benefit more from a potential intervention on AL. We suggest further investigation of sex differences concerning the mediation by physiological and psychological intermediates.

Allostatic load scoring using item response theory

Configurations, comparisons, and challenges calculating allostatic load

Does allostatic load calculation method matter? Evaluation of different methods and individual biomarkers functioning by race/ethnicity and educational level

Variation in the Calculation of Allostatic Load Score: 21 Examples from NHANES

Harmonizing the assessment of allostatic load across cycles of the Canadian Health Measures Survey: Variable selection and calculation method

Allostatic Load in Childhood, Adolescence, and Young Adulthood: Are Assumptions of Measurement Invariance Warranted?

Allostatic load and sum scores don’t always add up: Using network models to profile biopsychosocial patterns among patients with mood disorders

Measurement of Allostatic Load in Caregivers of Older Hispanic People With Alzheimer Disease and Related Disorders

- Investigating the role of allostatic load in the association between childhood adversity and psychopathology in the UK Biobank

Does allostatic load predict incidental coronary events differently among sexes?

Assessing the Cumulative Effects of Stress: the Association Between Job Stress and Allostatic Load in A Large Sample of Chinese Employees

Associations of allostatic load with sociodemographic factors, depressive symptoms, lifestyle, and health characteristics in a large general population-based sample

Correlation between allostatic load index and cumulative mortality: a register-based study of Danish municipalities

An evaluation of the All of Us Research Program database to examine cumulative stress

Allostatic load in early adolescence: gene / environment contributions and relevance for mental health

Allostatic load in rat model: An efficient tool for evaluating and understanding aging

Self-Reported Health as Predictor of Allostatic Load and All-Cause Mortality: Findings From the Lolland-Falster Health Study

Longitudinal association of allostatic load with depressive symptoms among urban adults: Healthy Aging in Neighborhoods of Diversity across the Life Span study

Assessing the Correlation between Allostatic Load and False-Positive Image-Guided Breast Biopsies

- Examining Differences in Allostatic Load across Sociodemographic Factors among Adolescents with Overweight or Obesity

Comprehensive allostatic load risk index is associated with increased frontal and left parietal white matter hyperintensities in mid-life cognitively healthy adults