Potential role of PFOB enhanced sonography of the kidney. I. Detection of renal function and acute tubular necrosis.

D. Munzing,R. Mattrey,V. Reznik,R. Mitten,T. Peterson

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/KI.1991.89

IF: 19.6

1991-04-01

Kidney International

Abstract:

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

A prognostic model for use before elective surgery to estimate the risk of postoperative pulmonary complications (GSU-Pulmonary Score): a development and validation study in three international cohorts

NIHR Global Health Research Unit on Global Surgery,STARSurg Collaborative

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2589-7500(24)00065-7

Abstract:Background: Pulmonary complications are the most common cause of death after surgery. This study aimed to derive and externally validate a novel prognostic model that can be used before elective surgery to estimate the risk of postoperative pulmonary complications and to support resource allocation and prioritisation during pandemic recovery. Methods: Data from an international, prospective cohort study were used to develop a novel prognostic risk model for pulmonary complications after elective surgery in adult patients (aged ≥18 years) across all operation and disease types. The primary outcome measure was postoperative pulmonary complications at 30 days after surgery, which was a composite of pneumonia, acute respiratory distress syndrome, and unexpected mechanical ventilation. Model development with candidate predictor variables was done in the GlobalSurg-CovidSurg Week dataset (global; October, 2020). Two structured machine learning techniques were explored (XGBoost and the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator [LASSO]), and the model with the best performance (GSU-Pulmonary Score) underwent internal validation using bootstrap resampling. The discrimination and calibration of the score were externally validated in two further prospective cohorts: CovidSurg-Cancer (worldwide; February to August, 2020, during the COVID-19 pandemic) and RECON (UK and Australasia; January to October, 2019, before the COVID-19 pandemic). The model was deployed as an online web application. The GlobalSurg-CovidSurg Week and CovidSurg-Cancer studies were registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04509986 and NCT04384926. Findings: Prognostic models were developed from 13 candidate predictor variables in data from 86 231 patients (1158 hospitals in 114 countries). External validation included 30 492 patients from CovidSurg-Cancer (726 hospitals in 75 countries) and 6789 from RECON (150 hospitals in three countries). The overall rates of pulmonary complications were 2·0% in derivation data, and 3·9% (CovidSurg-Cancer) and 4·7% (RECON) in the validation datasets. Penalised regression using LASSO had similar discrimination to XGBoost (area under the receiver operating curve [AUROC] 0·786, 95% CI 0·774-0·798 vs 0·785, 0·772-0·797), was more explainable, and required fewer covariables. The final GSU-Pulmonary Score included ten predictor variables and showed good discrimination and calibration upon internal validation (AUROC 0·773, 95% CI 0·751-0·795; Brier score 0·020, calibration in the large [CITL] 0·034, slope 0·954). The model performance was acceptable on external validation in CovidSurg-Cancer (AUROC 0·746, 95% CI 0·733-0·760; Brier score 0·036, CITL 0·109, slope 1·056), but with some miscalibration in RECON data (AUROC 0·716, 95% CI 0·689-0·744; Brier score 0·045, CITL 1·040, slope 1·009). Interpretation: This novel prognostic risk score uses simple predictor variables available at the time of a decision for elective surgery that can accurately stratify patients' risk of postoperative pulmonary complications, including during SARS-CoV-2 outbreaks. It could inform surgical consent, resource allocation, and hospital-level prioritisation as elective surgery is upscaled to address global backlogs. Funding: National Institute for Health Research.
Systematic development and validation of a predictive model for major postoperative complications in the Peri‐operative Quality Improvement Project (PQIP) dataset

C. M. Oliver,D. Wagstaff,J. Bedford,S. R. Moonesinghe,for the Peri‐operative Quality Improvement Project delivery team and collaborative

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.16248

IF: 12.893

2024-02-20

Anaesthesia

Abstract:Summary Complications are common following major surgery and are associated with increased use of healthcare resources, disability and mortality. Continued reliance on mortality estimates risks harming patients and health systems, but existing tools for predicting complications are unwieldy and inaccurate. We aimed to systematically construct an accurate pre‐operative model for predicting major postoperative complications; compare its performance against existing tools; and identify sources of inaccuracy in predictive models more generally. Complete patient records from the UK Peri‐operative Quality Improvement Programme dataset were analysed. Major complications were defined as Clavien–Dindo grade ≥ 2 for novel models. In a 75% train:25% test split cohort, we developed a pipeline of increasingly complex models, prioritising pre‐operative predictors using Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operators (LASSO). We defined the best model in the training cohort by the lowest Akaike's information criterion, balancing accuracy and simplicity. Of the 24,983 included cases, 6389 (25.6%) patients developed major complications. Potentially modifiable risk factors (pain, reduced mobility and smoking) were retained. The best‐performing model was highly complex, specifying individual hospital complication rates and 11 patient covariates. This novel model showed substantially superior performance over generic and specific prediction models and scores. We have developed a novel complications model with good internal accuracy, re‐prioritised predictor variables and identified hospital‐level variation as an important, but overlooked, source of inaccuracy in existing tools. The complexity of the best‐performing model does, however, highlight the need for a step‐change in clinical risk prediction to automate the delivery of informative risk estimates in clinical systems.

anesthesiology
Prognostic model to predict postoperative acute kidney injury in patients undergoing major gastrointestinal surgery based on a national prospective observational cohort study

STARSurg Collaborative

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs5.86

2018-07-27

BJS Open

Abstract:Background: Acute illness, existing co-morbidities and surgical stress response can all contribute to postoperative acute kidney injury (AKI) in patients undergoing major gastrointestinal surgery. The aim of this study was prospectively to develop a pragmatic prognostic model to stratify patients according to risk of developing AKI after major gastrointestinal surgery. Methods: This prospective multicentre cohort study included consecutive adults undergoing elective or emergency gastrointestinal resection, liver resection or stoma reversal in 2-week blocks over a continuous 3-month period. The primary outcome was the rate of AKI within 7 days of surgery. Bootstrap stability was used to select clinically plausible risk factors into the model. Internal model validation was carried out by bootstrap validation. Results: A total of 4544 patients were included across 173 centres in the UK and Ireland. The overall rate of AKI was 14·2 per cent (646 of 4544) and the 30-day mortality rate was 1·8 per cent (84 of 4544). Stage 1 AKI was significantly associated with 30-day mortality (unadjusted odds ratio 7·61, 95 per cent c.i. 4·49 to 12·90; P < 0·001), with increasing odds of death with each AKI stage. Six variables were selected for inclusion in the prognostic model: age, sex, ASA grade, preoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate, planned open surgery and preoperative use of either an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or an angiotensin receptor blocker. Internal validation demonstrated good model discrimination (c-statistic 0·65). Discussion: Following major gastrointestinal surgery, AKI occurred in one in seven patients. This preoperative prognostic model identified patients at high risk of postoperative AKI. Validation in an independent data set is required to ensure generalizability.
Risk prediction model for postoperative pneumonia in esophageal cancer patients: A systematic review

Yaxin Jiang,Zimeng Li,Weiting Jiang,Tingyu Wei,Bizhen Chen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2024.1419633

IF: 4.7

2024-08-06

Frontiers in Oncology

Abstract:Background: Numerous studies have developed or validated prediction models to estimate the likelihood of postoperative pneumonia (POP) in esophageal cancer (EC) patients. The quality of these models and the evaluation of their applicability to clinical practice and future research remains unknown. This study systematically evaluated the risk of bias and applicability of risk prediction models for developing POP in patients undergoing esophageal cancer surgery. Methods: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), China Science and Technology Journal Database (VIP), WanFang Database and Chinese Biomedical Literature Database were searched from inception to March 12, 2024. Two investigators independently screened the literature and extracted data. The Prediction Model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool (PROBAST) checklist was employed to evaluate both the risk of bias and applicability. Result: A total of 14 studies involving 23 models were included. These studies were mainly published between 2014 and 2023. The applicability of all studies was good. However, all studies exhibited a high risk of bias, primarily attributed to inappropriate data sources, insufficient sample size, irrational treatment of variables and missing data, and lack of model validation. The incidence of POP in patients undergoing esophageal cancer surgery ranged from 14.60% to 39.26%. The most frequently used predictors were smoking, age, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease(COPD), diabetes mellitus, and methods of thoracotomy. Inter-model discrimination ranged from 0.627 to 0.850, sensitivity ranged between 60.7% and 84.0%, and specificity ranged from 59.1% to 83.9%. Conclusion: In all included studies, good discrimination was reported for risk prediction models for POP in patients undergoing esophageal cancer surgery, indicating stable model performance. However, according to the PROBAST checklist, all studies had a high risk of bias. Future studies should use the predictive model assessment tool to improve study design and develop new models with larger samples and multicenter external validation. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero, identifier CRD42024527085.

oncology
The Estimation of Physiologic Ability and Surgical Stress (E-PASS) Model As a Predictor of Postoperative Complications and Mortality after Digestive Surgeries: a Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review.

Guoqiao Chen,Yongle Chen,Yili Dai,Zhaoqi Shi,Junhai Pan,Xiaoxiao Fan,Hui Lin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21037/apm-21-941

2021-01-01

Annals of Palliative Medicine

Abstract:BACKGROUND:Conflicting results exist about the usefulness of the Estimation of Physiologic Ability and Surgical Stress (E-PASS) model in patients undergoing digestive surgeries. Thus, this study aims to analyze and evaluate the E-PASS model for predicting postoperative complications and mortality.METHODS:A literature search strategy for "E-PASS" was carried out in PubMed, Embase, Google Scholar, Ovid, and Cochrane databases for studies published before November 2020. "E-PASS" or "Estimation of Physiologic Ability and Surgical Stress" were used as the search terms in all databases, and a total of 20 published English language studies with available data relating to digestive surgery were selected for this study. Clinical data and indices including preoperative risk score (PRS), surgical stress score (SSS), comprehensive risk score (CRS), postoperative complications, mortality, and overall survival (OS) were collected. Meta-analyses of heterogeneity were performed using Review Manager version 5.3 and STATA 14.0.RESULTS:Twenty studies with 9,136 patients were included in our meta-analysis. Using a random-effects model, the indices of the E-PASS model in patients with postoperative complications were significantly greater than those in patients without complications [PRS: 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.14-1.50; SSS: 95% CI: 0.28-1.06; CRS: 95% CI: 048-1.49]. Moreover, patient morbidity and mortality were associated with a higher CRS (morbidity: 95% CI: 2.17-6.29; mortality: 95% CI: 1.57-4.78), while subgroup analyses showed that a high CRS in the elderly was related to increased morbidity (95% CI: 1.57-4.78) without heterogeneity. In addition, we found that a high E-PASS CRS was significantly associated with shorter OS after digestive surgery (95% CI: 1.24-5.41).DISCUSSION:The higher CRS score in the E-PASS model accompanies with many postoperative complications, increased mortality and shorter OS. Collectively, the E-PASS model is a convenient and effective risk assessment for patients undergoing digestive surgeries. More stringently designed studies are expected to develop better estimates of the application value of this model in digestive surgeries.
The ARISCAT score is a promising model to predict postoperative pulmonary complications after major emergency abdominal surgery: an external validation in a Danish cohort

Dunja Kokotovic,Thea Helene Degett,Sarah Ekeloef,Jakob Burcharth

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-021-01826-6

2022-01-20

European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery

Abstract:PurposePostoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) occur in up to 30% of patients undergoing surgery and are a significant contributor to the overall risk of surgery. A preoperative risk prediction tool for postoperative pulmonary complications could succour clinical identification of patients at increased risk and support clinical decision making. This original study aimed to externally validate a risk model for predicting postoperative pulmonary complications (ARISCAT) in a cohort of patients undergoing major emergency abdominal surgery at a Danish University Hospital.MethodsARISCAT was validated prospectively in a cohort of patients undergoing major emergency abdominal surgery between March 2017 and January 2019. Predicted PPCs by ARISCAT were compared with observed PPCs. ARISCAT was validated with calibration, discrimination and accuracy and in adherence to the TRIPOD statement.ResultsThe study included a total of 585 patients with a median age of 70 years. The majority of patients underwent emergency laparotomy without bowel resection. The predicted PPC frequency by ARISCAT was 24.9%, while the observed frequency of PPCs in the cohort was 36.1%. The slope of the calibration plot was 0.9546, the y axis interception was 0.1269 and the plot was well fitted to a linear slope. The Hosmer Lemeshow goodness-of-fit analysis showed good calibration (p > 0.25). ARISCAT showed good discrimination with AUC 0.83 (95% CI 0.79–0.86) on a receiver-operating characteristics curve and the accuracy was also good with a Brier score of 0.19.ConclusionsARISCAT was a promising tool to predict PPCs in a high-risk surgical population undergoing major emergency abdominal surgery.

emergency medicine
Idiopathic uniocular juxtafoveolar retinal telangiectasis in a female patient

M. Teräsvirta,E. Tuovinen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-3768.1985.tb06841.x

1985-07-01

Abstract:Abstract This article describes a female patient with uniocular juxtafoveolar telangiectasis which previously has been reported in male patients only.
Risk prediction models in emergency surgery: Protocol for a scoping review

Anna K. Hansted,Morten H. Møller,Ann M. Møller,Jakob Burcharth,Sofie S. Thorup,Morten Vester‐Andersen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/aas.14383

2024-02-07

Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica

Abstract:Background Risk prediction models are used for many purposes in emergency surgery, including critical care triage and benchmarking. Several risk prediction models have been developed, and some are used for purposes other than those for which they were developed. We aim to provide an overview of the existing literature on risk prediction models used in emergency surgery and highlight knowledge gaps. Methods We will conduct a scoping review on risk prediction models used for patients undergoing emergency surgery in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA‐ScR). We will search Medline, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library and include all study designs. We aim to answer the following questions: (1) What risk prediction models are used in emergency surgery? (2) Which variables are used in these models? (3) Which surgical specialties are the models used for? (4) Have the models been externally validated? (5) Where have the models been externally validated? (6) What purposes were the models developed for? (7) What are the strengths and limitations of the included models? We will summarize the results descriptively. The certainty of evidence will be evaluated using a modified Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. Conclusion The outlined scoping review will summarize the existing literature on risk prediction models used in emergency surgery and highlight knowledge gaps.

anesthesiology
Prediction Models for Forecasting Risk of Development of Surgical Site Infection after Lower Limb Revascularization Surgery: A Systematic Review

Aidan M Kirkham,Jasmine Candeliere,Dean Fergusson,Henry T Stelfox,Timothy Brandys,Daniel I McIsaac,Tim Ramsay,Derek J Roberts,Aidan M. Kirkham,Henry T. Stelfox,Daniel I. McIsaac,Derek J. Roberts

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avsg.2023.11.034

IF: 1.5

2024-05-01

Annals of Vascular Surgery

Abstract:BACKGROUND: Surgical site infections (SSIs) are a common and potentially preventable complication of lower limb revascularization surgery associated with increased healthcare resource utilization and patient morbidity. We conducted a systematic review to evaluate multivariable prediction models designed to forecast risk of SSI development after these procedures.METHODS: After protocol registration (CRD42022331292), we searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, and Evidence-Based Medicine Reviews (inception to April 4th, 2023) for studies describing multivariable prediction models designed to forecast risk of SSI in adults after lower limb revascularization surgery. Two investigators independently screened abstracts and full-text articles, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias. A narrative synthesis was performed to summarize predictors included in the models and their calibration and discrimination, validation status, and clinical applicability.RESULTS: Among the 6,671 citations identified, we included 5 studies (n = 23,063 patients). The included studies described 5 unique multivariable prediction models generated through forward selection, backward selection, or Akaike Information Criterion-based methods. Two models were designed to predict any SSI and 3 Szyilagyi grade II (extending into subcutaneous tissue) SSI. Across the 5 models, 18 adjusted predictors (10 of which were preoperative, 3 intraoperative, and 5 postoperative) significantly predicted any SSI and 14 adjusted predictors significantly predict Szilagyi grade II SSI. Female sex, obesity, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease significantly predicted SSI in more than one model. All models had a "good fit" according to the Hosmer-Lemeshow test (P > 0.05). Model discrimination was quantified using the area under the curve, which ranged from 0.66 to 0.75 across models. Two models were internally validated using non-exhaustive twofold cross-validation and bootstrap resampling. No model was externally validated. Three studies had a high overall risk of bias according to the Prediction model Risk Of Bias ASsessment Tool (PROBAST).CONCLUSIONS: Five multivariable prediction models with moderate discrimination have been developed to forecast risk of SSI development after lower limb revascularization surgery. Given the frequency and consequences of SSI after these procedures, development and external validation of novel prediction models and comparison of these models to the existing models evaluated in this systematic review is warranted.

surgery,peripheral vascular disease
Prediction models for major adverse cardiovascular events after percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review

Wenqi Deng,Dayang Wang,Yandi Wan,Sijia Lai,Yukun Ding,Xian Wang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2023.1287434

IF: 3.6

2024-01-09

Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine

Abstract:Background: The number of models developed for predicting major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is increasing, but the performance of these models is unknown. The purpose of this systematic review is to evaluate, describe, and compare existing models and analyze the factors that can predict outcomes. Methods: We adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 during the execution of this review. Databases including Embase, PubMed, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CNKI, Wanfang Data, VIP, and SINOMED were comprehensively searched for identifying studies published from 1977 to 19 May 2023. Model development studies specifically designed for assessing the occurrence of MACE after PCI with or without external validation were included. Bias and transparency were evaluated by the Prediction Model Risk Of Bias Assessment Tool (PROBAST) and Transparent Reporting of a multivariate Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis (TRIPOD) statement. The key findings were narratively summarized and presented in tables. Results: A total of 5,234 articles were retrieved, and after thorough screening, 23 studies that met the predefined inclusion criteria were ultimately included. The models were mainly constructed using data from individuals diagnosed with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). The discrimination of the models, as measured by the area under the curve (AUC) or C-index, varied between 0.638 and 0.96. The commonly used predictor variables include LVEF, age, Killip classification, diabetes, and various others. All models were determined to have a high risk of bias, and their adherence to the TRIPOD items was reported to be over 60%. Conclusion: The existing models show some predictive ability, but all have a high risk of bias due to methodological shortcomings. This suggests that investigators should follow guidelines to develop high-quality models for better clinical service and dissemination. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=400835, Identifier CRD42023400835.

cardiac & cardiovascular systems
Protocol for the derivation and external validation of a 30-day postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) risk prediction model for elderly patients undergoing thoracic surgery: a cohort study in southern China

Wei Wei,Xi Zheng,Chao Wei Zhou,Anyu Zhang,Ming Zhou,HuaYong Yao,Tao Jiang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066815

IF: 3.006

2023-02-10

BMJ Open

Abstract:Introduction: Postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) occur after up to 60% of non-cardiac thoracic surgery (NCTS), especially for multimorbid elderly patients. Nevertheless, current risk prediction models for PPCs have major limitations regarding derivation and validation, and do not account for the specific risks of NCTS patients. Well-founded and externally validated models specific to elderly NCTS patients are warranted to inform consent and treatment decisions. Methods and analysis: We will develop, internally and externally validate a multivariable risk model to predict 30-day PPCs in elderly NCTS patients. Our cohort will be generated in three study sites in southern China with a target population of approximately 1400 between October 2021 and December 2023. Candidate predictors have been selected based on published data, clinical expertise and epidemiological knowledge. Our model will be derived using the combination of multivariable logistic regression and bootstrapping technique to lessen predictors. The final model will be internally validated using bootstrapping validation technique and externally validated using data from different study sites. A parsimonious risk score will then be developed on the basis of beta estimates derived from the logistic model. Model performance will be evaluated using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, max-rescaled Brier score and calibration slope. In exploratory analysis, we will also assess the net benefit of Probability of PPCs Associated with THoracic surgery in elderly patients score in the complete cohort using decision curve analysis. Ethics and dissemination: Ethical approval has been obtained from the Institutional Review Board of the Affiliated Cancer Hospital and Institute of Guangzhou Medical University, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine and the University of Hongkong-Shenzhen Hospital, respectively. The final risk prediction model will be published in an appropriate journal and further disseminated as an online calculator or nomogram for clinical application. Approved and anonymised data will be shared. Trial registration number: ChiCTR2100051170.
Prediction of Morbidity and Mortality After Esophagectomy: A Systematic Review

M. P. van Nieuw Amerongen,H. J. de Grooth,G. L. Veerman,K. A. Ziesemer,M. I. van Berge Henegouwen,P. R. Tuinman

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-024-14997-4

IF: 4.339

2024-02-21

Annals of Surgical Oncology

Abstract:Abstract Background Esophagectomy for esophageal cancer has a complication rate of up to 60%. Prediction models could be helpful to preoperatively estimate which patients are at increased risk of morbidity and mortality. The objective of this study was to determine the best prediction models for morbidity and mortality after esophagectomy and to identify commonalities among the models. Patients and Methods A systematic review was performed in accordance to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement and was prospectively registered in PROSPERO ( https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/ , study ID CRD42022350846). Pubmed, Embase, and Clarivate Analytics/Web of Science Core Collection were searched for studies published between 2010 and August 2022. The Prediction model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool was used to assess the risk of bias. Extracted data were tabulated and a narrative synthesis was performed. Results Of the 15,011 articles identified, 22 studies were included using data from tens of thousands of patients. This systematic review included 33 different models, of which 18 models were newly developed. Many studies showed a high risk of bias. The prognostic accuracy of models differed between 0.51 and 0.85. For most models, variables are readily available. Two models for mortality and one model for pulmonary complications have the potential to be developed further. Conclusions The availability of rigorous prediction models is limited. Several models are promising but need to be further developed. Some models provide information about risk factors for the development of complications. Performance status is a potential modifiable risk factor. None are ready for clinical implementation.

oncology,surgery
Predictors of Postoperative Pulmonary Complications Following Abdominal Surgery

Jo Ann Brooks-Brunn

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.111.3.564

IF: 9.6

1997-03-01

Chest

Abstract:STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine how risk factors could be combined to best predict the development of a postoperative pulmonary complication (PPC) following abdominal surgery.DESIGN: Prospective model-building study. Logistic regression models were developed using significant risk factors identified in the univariate analysis.SETTING: Four midwestern hospitals.PATIENTS: Convenience sample of 400 patients who underwent abdominal surgical procedures between January 1993 and August 1995.MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Multicriteria outcome for postoperative pulmonary complication used to collectively assess atelectasis and pneumonia. Twenty-three risk factors were assessed. Six risk factors were identified as independent by logistic regression: age > or = 60 years (adjusted odds ratio [Adj OR], 1.89); impaired preoperative cognitive function (Adj OR, 5.93); smoking history within the past 8 weeks (Adj OR, 2.27); body mass index > or = 27 (Adj OR, 2.82); history of cancer (Adj OR, 2.23); and incision site-upper abdominal or both upper/lower abdominal incision (Adj OR 2.30).CONCLUSIONS: These results provide a framework for identifying patients at risk of developing a PPC following abdominal surgery. A reliable and valid risk index could be used clinically to guide preoperative and postoperative pulmonary care and target limited resources for patients at risk.

respiratory system,critical care medicine
Predicting morbidity and mortality after radical cystectomy using risk calculators: A comprehensive review of the literature

Shirin Razdan,Michaela Sljivich,John Pfail,Peter K Wiklund,John P Sfakianos,Nikhil Waingankar

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2020.09.032

Abstract:Introduction: Radical cystectomy (RC) with urinary diversion is associated with significant perioperative morbidity and mortality, varying between 30% and 70% and between 0.3% and 10.6%, respectively. Risk calculators have been extensively studied in the general surgery literature to predict 30- and 90-day postoperative morbidity and mortality but have not been widely accepted in the RC literature. Materials and methods: We performed a search of MEDLINE and Embase databases during May 2020 to identify all relevant studies using the following keywords: radical cystectomy, surgical complication predictive model, surgical complication predictive equation, surgical complication predictive nomogram, surgical risk calculator, morbidity, and mortality. We determined the existing surgical predictive nomograms, calculators, and indices and their accuracy in predicting morbidity, mortality, and major complications after RC. Results: National Surgical Quality Improvement Program had poor accuracy at predicting 30-day morbidity at mortality (AUC 0.5-0.6). LACE index showed good discrimination at predicting 90-day mortality (AUC 0.7). The various frailty and sarcopenia indices have shown poor to fair accuracy at predicting (AUC 0.5-0.7). The Isbarn and Aziz nomograms have equivalent accuracy at predicting 90-day mortality (AUC 0.7) but are limited by inclusion of tumor histology and presence of metastatic disease as variables. POSSUM and P-POSSUM have poor ability at predicting morbidity and mortality (AUC 0.5) and are cumbersome calculators. The surgical Apgar score has been able to predict 30-day morbidity and mortality but can only be used in the postoperative setting. Discussion: The currently available surgical risk calculators have either poor accuracy at predicting post-RC morbidity and mortality or are limited by types of variables included. An ideal risk calculator would be comprised of preoperative factors only and have a high accuracy to serve as a tool for preoperative patient counseling prior to surgery. Conclusion: There exists a strong need to develop a comprehensive and accurate preoperative risk calculator that predicts morbidity and mortality after RC.
Utilising intraoperative respiratory dynamic features for developing and validating an explainable machine learning model for postoperative pulmonary complications

Peiyi Li,Shuanliang Gao,Yaqiang Wang,RuiHao Zhou,Guo Chen,Weimin Li,Xuechao Hao,Tao Zhu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2024.02.025

IF: 11.719

2024-04-01

British Journal of Anaesthesia

Abstract:BACKGROUND: Timely detection of modifiable risk factors for postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) could inform ventilation strategies that attenuate lung injury. We sought to develop, validate, and internally test machine learning models that use intraoperative respiratory features to predict PPCs.METHODS: We analysed perioperative data from a cohort comprising patients aged 65 yr and older at an academic medical centre from 2019 to 2023. Two linear and four nonlinear learning models were developed and compared with the current gold-standard risk assessment tool ARISCAT (Assess Respiratory Risk in Surgical Patients in Catalonia Tool). The Shapley additive explanation of artificial intelligence was utilised to interpret feature importance and interactions.RESULTS: Perioperative data were obtained from 10 284 patients who underwent 10 484 operations (mean age [range] 71 [65-98] yr; 42% female). An optimised XGBoost model that used preoperative variables and intraoperative respiratory variables had area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUROCs) of 0.878 (0.866-0.891) and 0.881 (0.879-0.883) in the validation and prospective cohorts, respectively. These models outperformed ARISCAT (AUROC: 0.496-0.533). The intraoperative dynamic features of respiratory dynamic system compliance, mechanical power, and driving pressure were identified as key modifiable contributors to PPCs. A simplified model based on XGBoost including 20 variables generated an AUROC of 0.864 (0.852-0.875) in an internal testing cohort. This has been developed into a web-based tool for further external validation (https://aorm.wchscu.cn/).CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that real-time identification of surgical patients' risk of postoperative pulmonary complications could help personalise intraoperative ventilatory strategies and reduce postoperative pulmonary complications.

anesthesiology
Clinical prediction models for the management of blunt chest trauma in the emergency department: a systematic review

Ceri Battle,Elaine Cole,Kym Carter,Edward Baker

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12873-024-01107-6

2024-10-12

Abstract:Background: The aim of this systematic review was to investigate how clinical prediction models compare in terms of their methodological development, validation, and predictive capabilities, for patients with blunt chest trauma presenting to the Emergency Department. Methods: A systematic review was conducted across databases from 1st Jan 2000 until 1st April 2024. Studies were categorised into three types of multivariable prediction research and data extracted regarding methodological issues and the predictive capabilities of each model. Risk of bias and applicability were assessed. Results: 41 studies were included that discussed 22 different models. The most commonly observed study design was a single-centre, retrospective, chart review. The most widely externally validated clinical prediction models with moderate to good discrimination were the Thoracic Trauma Severity Score and the STUMBL Score. Discussion: This review demonstrates that the predictive ability of some of the existing clinical prediction models is acceptable, but high risk of bias and lack of subsequent external validation limits the extensive application of the models. The Thoracic Trauma Severity Score and STUMBL Score demonstrate better predictive accuracy in both development and external validation studies than the other models, but require recalibration and / or update and evaluation of their clinical and cost effectiveness. Review registration: PROSPERO database ( https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=351638 ).
Predicting surgical outcomes of acute diffuse peritonitis: Updated risk models based on real‐world clinical data

Naoya Sato,Shinya Hirakawa,Shigeru Marubashi,Hisateru Tachimori,Taro Oshikiri,Hiroaki Miyata,Yoshihiro Kakeji,Yuko Kitagawa

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ags3.12800

2024-04-04

Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery

Abstract:Risk models for predicting postoperative surgical outcomes of acute diffused peritonitis (ADP) were created and validated using the recent real‐world clinical dataset of the Japanese Nationwide Clinical Database (NCD). Evaluation of predictive power and calibration of these risk models showed they were sufficiently reliable to be used in clinical settings. Aim The existing predictive risk models for the surgical outcome of acute diffused peritonitis (ADP) need renovation by adding relevant variables such as ADP's definition or causative etiology to pursue outstanding data collection reflecting the real world. We aimed to revise the risk models predicting mortality and morbidities of ADP using the latest Japanese Nationwide Clinical Database (NCD) variable set. Methods Clinical dataset of ADP patients who underwent surgery, and registered in the NCD between 2016 and 2019, were used to develop a risk model for surgical outcomes. The primary outcome was perioperative mortality. Results After data cleanup, 45 379 surgical cases for ADP were derived for analysis. The perioperative and 30‐day mortality were 10.6% and 7.2%, respectively. The prediction models have been created for the mortality and 10 morbidities associated with the mortality. The top five relevant predictors for perioperative mortality were age >80, advanced cancer with multiple metastases, platelet count of <50 000/mL, serum albumin of <2.0 g/dL, and unknown ADP site. The C‐indices of perioperative and 30‐day mortality were 0.859 and 0.857, respectively. The predicted value calculated with the risk models for mortality was highly fitted with the actual probability from the lower to the higher risk groups. Conclusions Risk models for postoperative mortality and morbidities with good predictive performance and reliability were revised and validated using the recent real‐world clinical dataset. These models help to predict ADP surgical outcomes accurately and are available for clinical settings.

gastroenterology & hepatology
A Clinical Prediction Model for Postoperative Pneumonia After Lung Cancer Surgery

Jian Zhou,Dongsheng Wu,Quan Zheng,Tengyong Wang,Mingying Lin,Tianyi Lu,Feng Lin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2022.11.021

2023-01-01

Abstract:Introduction: Postoperative pneumonia (POP) is a common complication following lung can-cer surgery and is associated with increased hospitalization costs and mortalities. We aimed to identify risk factors associated with POP and to develop a reliable predictive model.Methods: Patients who underwent lung cancer surgery between January 2015 and December 2021 in our hospital were enrolled. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression analysis was used to select predictors of POP. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to construct the nomogram. Bootstrap resampling was conducted for in-ternal validation. The performance of the model was evaluated by discrimination and calibration.Results: A total of 5269 consecutive patients were enrolled. POP occurred in 1.7% of patients (92/5269). Five independent predictors were identified: age, predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 s, predicted diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide, tuberculosis history, and surgery duration. The multivariable regression model showed good discrimi-nation (C-index: 0.821, 95% confidence interval, 0.783-0.859), which was well validated by internal validation. The calibration curve illustrated good agreement between the pre-dicted probability and observed probability of POP.Conclusions: Based on the easily available risk factors, our nomogram could predict the risk of POP with good discrimination and calibration. The model has good clinical practicability, enabling precise and targeted interventions to reduce the incidence of POP in high-risk patients.(c) 2022 Published by Elsevier Inc.
A systematic review of cardiac surgery clinical prediction models that include intra-operative variables

Ceri Jones,Marcus Taylor,Matthew Sperrin,Stuart W. Grant

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/02676591241237758

2024-04-24

Perfusion

Abstract:Perfusion, Ahead of Print. BackgroundMost cardiac surgery clinical prediction models (CPMs) are developed using pre-operative variables to predict post-operative outcomes. Some CPMs are developed with intra-operative variables, but none are widely used. The objective of this systematic review was to identify CPMs with intra-operative variables that predict short-term outcomes following adult cardiac surgery.MethodsOvid MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were searched from inception to December 2022, for studies developing a CPM with at least one intra-operative variable. Data were extracted using a critical appraisal framework and bias assessment tool. Model performance was analysed using discrimination and calibration measures.ResultsA total of 24 models were identified. Frequent predicted outcomes were acute kidney injury (9/24 studies) and peri-operative mortality (6/24 studies). Frequent pre-operative variables were age (18/24 studies) and creatinine/eGFR (18/24 studies). Common intra-operative variables were cardiopulmonary bypass time (16/24 studies) and transfusion (13/24 studies). Model discrimination was acceptable for all internally validated models (AUC 0.69-0.91). Calibration was poor (15/24 studies) or unreported (8/24 studies). Most CPMs were at a high or indeterminate risk of bias (23/24 models). The added value of intra-operative variables was assessed in six studies with statistically significantly improved discrimination demonstrated in two.ConclusionWeak reporting and methodological limitations may restrict wider applicability and adoption of existing CPMs that include intra-operative variables. There is some evidence that CPM discrimination is improved with the addition of intra-operative variables. Further work is required to understand the role of intra-operative CPMs in the management of cardiac surgery patients.

cardiac & cardiovascular systems,peripheral vascular disease
Models for predicting venous thromboembolism in ambulatory patients with lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Ann-Rong Yan,Indira Samarawickrema,Mark Naunton,Gregory M. Peterson,Desmond Yip,Phillip Newman,Reza Mortazavi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.thromres.2024.01.003

IF: 10.407

2024-01-09

Thrombosis Research

Abstract:Aims The incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with lung cancer is relatively high, and risk stratification models are vital for the targeted application of thromboprophylaxis. We aimed to review VTE risk prediction models that have been developed in patients with lung cancer and evaluate their performance. Methods and results Twenty-four eligible studies involving 123,493 patients were included. The pooled incidence of VTE within 12 months was 11 % (95 % CI 8 %–14 %). With the identified four existing VTE risk assessment tools, meta-analyses did not show a significant discriminatory capability of stratifying VTE risk using Khorana, PROTECHT and CONKO scores. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of the Khorana score were 24 % (95 % CI 11 %–44 %) and 84 % (95 % CI 73 %–91 %) at the 3-point cut-off, and 43 % (95 % CI 35 %–52 %) and 61 % (95 % CI 52 %–69 %) at the 2-point cut-off. A COMPASS-CAT score ≥ 7 points indicated a significantly high VTE risk, with a RR of 4.68 (95 % CI 1.05–20.80). Conclusions The Khorana score lacked discriminatory capability in identifying patients with lung cancer at high VTE risk, regardless of the cut-off value. The COMPASS-CAT score had better performance, but further validation is needed. The results indicate the need for robust VTE risk assessment tools specifically designed and validated for lung cancer patients. Future research should include relevant biomarkers as important predictors and consider the combined use of risk tools. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42021245907.

peripheral vascular disease,hematology

Potential role of PFOB enhanced sonography of the kidney. I. Detection of renal function and acute tubular necrosis.

A prognostic model for use before elective surgery to estimate the risk of postoperative pulmonary complications (GSU-Pulmonary Score): a development and validation study in three international cohorts

Systematic development and validation of a predictive model for major postoperative complications in the Peri‐operative Quality Improvement Project (PQIP) dataset

Prognostic model to predict postoperative acute kidney injury in patients undergoing major gastrointestinal surgery based on a national prospective observational cohort study

Risk prediction model for postoperative pneumonia in esophageal cancer patients: A systematic review

The Estimation of Physiologic Ability and Surgical Stress (E-PASS) Model As a Predictor of Postoperative Complications and Mortality after Digestive Surgeries: a Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review.

The ARISCAT score is a promising model to predict postoperative pulmonary complications after major emergency abdominal surgery: an external validation in a Danish cohort

Idiopathic uniocular juxtafoveolar retinal telangiectasis in a female patient

Risk prediction models in emergency surgery: Protocol for a scoping review

Prediction Models for Forecasting Risk of Development of Surgical Site Infection after Lower Limb Revascularization Surgery: A Systematic Review

Prediction models for major adverse cardiovascular events after percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review

Protocol for the derivation and external validation of a 30-day postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) risk prediction model for elderly patients undergoing thoracic surgery: a cohort study in southern China

Prediction of Morbidity and Mortality After Esophagectomy: A Systematic Review

Predictors of Postoperative Pulmonary Complications Following Abdominal Surgery

Predicting morbidity and mortality after radical cystectomy using risk calculators: A comprehensive review of the literature

Utilising intraoperative respiratory dynamic features for developing and validating an explainable machine learning model for postoperative pulmonary complications

Clinical prediction models for the management of blunt chest trauma in the emergency department: a systematic review

Predicting surgical outcomes of acute diffuse peritonitis: Updated risk models based on real‐world clinical data

A Clinical Prediction Model for Postoperative Pneumonia After Lung Cancer Surgery

A systematic review of cardiac surgery clinical prediction models that include intra-operative variables

Models for predicting venous thromboembolism in ambulatory patients with lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis