Designing a Performance Evaluation Model Based on Balanced Score Card and Analytic Hierarchy Process Methods: Montaserieh Hospital
Elaheh Hooshmand,A. Najar,H. Ebrahimipour,H. Esmaili,Hadi Zomorodi Niat
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5812/JHEALTHSCOPE.80342
2018-05-30
Health Scope
Abstract:Background: Balanced Score card is a performance evaluation tool that in combination with the AHP approach, creates a framework for transforming vision and mission to a set of targets and indicators, on the basis of importance in terms of the customer, financial and internal processes, and growth and learning perspectives. Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of Montaserieh hospital in 2015 using the balanced score card approach. Methods: This study combined quantitative and qualitative methods, and was conducted in Montaserieh Hospital in Mashhad, Iran,duringyear2015. First,throughgroupdiscussionsessionsamongthemembersof scorecard,alistof performanceassessment indices were prepared using the BSC approach, and then the list was finalized using the Delphi method. After that, the hospital strategic map was illustrated based on its objectives, and with the completion of analytic hierarchy process (AHP) standard ques-tionnaires, the priority of visions and indices with adjustment rate lower than 0.1 was obtained from 14 experts. At the end, the realization of each of the visions and indices and the hospital performance during 2015 was evaluated. Results: Thirty-fourindiceswereselectedregardingthefourvisionsof themodel,assevenindiceswereplacedineachof thevisions of customer, financial, growthandlearning, and13indicesfortheprocessesvision. Amongthevisionsof BSC,customervisionwith 58.26% was more powerful than the other ones. Among the indices, the index of percentage of respondents (0.39) had the highest factor of importance among the hospital indices. The final score for hospital performance in 2015 was obtained as 89.27%. Based on the analysis obtained from the AHP questionnaire pair wise comparison, the importance coefficient was calculated as 65.7%, 19.7%, 9% and 5.6% for customer, financial, processes, and growth and learning, respectively. Conclusions: Given the gap between expected objectives and current status of the hospital and resource constraints and condi-tions, the hospital should consider the priority and weight of each of the visions and indices for its future planning to identify the appropriate goals and define improvement projects more efficiently, and take effective steps for better performance.
Computer Science,Medicine,Business