Indeterminate results of QuantiFERON-TB Gold in-tube due to high nil concentration and methodological exploration and improvement

Wanchan Peng,Siyu Wu,Wei Chen,Yunli Zhang,Jinfang Fu,Ling Qiu,Wei Wang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2022.05.028
2022-08-01
Abstract:Background: The features of indeterminate results (ITRs) due to high interferon gamma (IFN-γ > 8.0 IU/mL) concentrations in Nil tubes of QuantiFERON-TB Gold in-Tube (QFT-GIT) have not been well studied. Therefore, this study aimed at investigating the features of ITRs and optimization alternatives for this method. Methods: We used the plasma exchange method to reduce the ITR rate due to high Nil concentrations (Nil > 8.0 IU/mL) between March 2020 and September 2021 at Xiangya Hospital of Central South University in China. One hundred and eleven out of 28,193 patient samples were considered ITRs due to Nil > 8.0 IU/mL. Of these 111, blood was re-sampled from 82 patients (pretreated group) who received the plasma exchange. Moreover, 40 out of 82 (blood volume ≥ 5 mL) received pretreated QFT-GIT and standard QFT-GIT (untreated group) simultaneously, while the remaining 42 received pretreated QFT-GIT only. The statistical difference between groups was evaluated. Cohen's kappa coefficient was used to assess the level of agreement between the pretreated and untreated group. Results: Of the 28,193 subjects, 1,083 (3.8%) had ITRs, and 111 (0.4%) had ITRs due to Nil > 8.0 IU/mL. The population studied had a mean age of 52.9 years, and 70.3% were men, which is a larger proportion than that in patients with ITR and the overall population. Significantly decreased IFN-γ levels in Nil tubes were detected using the pretreated QFT-GIT compared with standard QFT-GIT (p < 0.01). The determinate results rate in the pretreated group was significantly higher than that of the untreated group (80% (32/40) vs 57.5%, (23/40), p = 0.03). Further comparison revealed that the pretreated group was consistent with the untreated group in 17/20 (85%) positive tests, 3/3 (100%) negative tests, and 6/17 (35.3%) ITRs. The overall agreement rate was 26/40 (65%) among all 40 subjects, and the κ value was 0.39 (minimal agreement). The majority of results obtained after pretreatment were positive (71.2%, 59/82) and the agreement rate between clinical diagnosis and pretreated QFT-GIT was at least 61.0% (39/59). Conclusion: Plasma exchange pretreated QFT-GIT yields more reliable results than untreated QFT-GIT when processing high Nil concentrations.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?