Abstract:Purpose Psychological resilience, defined here as the capacity to bounce back from adversity and failure, has been studied in various leadership contexts. However, the literature demonstrates less consensus concerning how psychological resilience manifests in, and interacts within, the leadership role and, equally, the focus on resilience development is underdeveloped. This paper addresses these issues by focusing on the interactions between psychological resilience and leadership and presents practical development strategies. Design/methodology/approach A systematic review employing 46 empirical studies followed a thematic synthesis within an associated model encapsulated as building-up resilience and being effective. Findings First, resilience is identified as essential and can benefit individuals and organizations' work outcomes across leadership contexts, including work performance, job engagement, well-being, and enhanced leadership capability. Secondly, leaders may build up their resilience by obtaining coping skills and improved attitudes toward challenges. Resilient attitudes, which are presented as paradoxical perspectives towards challenges, may help leaders adapt to challenges and adversities leading to beneficial outcomes. Research limitations/implications Even though this study provides a deeper understanding of the essential function of psychological resilience in leadership, the findings are limited to the workplace contexts investigated, e.g. exploring small sample sizes (13,019) or country contexts (22). Future research could expand the rhetoric around interactions between psychological resilience and leadership. Furthermore, the underlining mechanism between the paradoxical perspective and resilient attitudes is still largely unclear. Thus, more research is needed to disclose the interaction of paradoxical perceptions and leadership resilience. Further research can investigate how resilient attitudes demonstrate in actions in dealing with challenges and adversities. Practical implications The authors further an argument that leaders may enhance their resilience through embracing a paradoxical perspective towards challenges (resilient attitude), e.g. being adaptive to adversities, and the attitude of learning from failures. These enhanced resilient attitudes could help leaders deeper understand and examine their reality and persist under high pressures and develop an innate ability to utilise resources more effectively to help them survive and thrive in challenging circumstances, instead of becoming overwhelmed by the burden of complexity or giving up. This will offer a practical contribution to resilience development. Social implications Importantly, this study found that resilience is an essential leadership trait and can benefit individuals and organizations' work outcomes across leadership contexts. These positive effects of resilience may encourage organizations or society to promote psychological resilience, including a resilient attitude, to deal with adversities and uncertainties. Originality/value Fundamentally, the synthesized model applied may encourage further studies to focus on how to build up resilience and practically apply it in workplaces across leadership contexts. In particular, this study found that adopting paradoxical perspectives and ambidextrous leadership approaches toward adversities is an original resilience development strategy, which serves to contribute to the gap in the literature.

Resilience is a dirty word: misunderstood, and how we can truly build it

On Resilience, Babies, and Bathwater

Conceptual Considerations for Understanding Resilience in Healthcare Students

Why Resilience in Health Care Systems is More than Coping with Disasters: Implications for Health Care Policy

A resilience view on health system resilience: a scoping review of empirical studies and reviews

Healthcare resilience: a meta-narrative systematic review and synthesis of reviews

We need to talk about ‘bad’ resilience

'Not a panacea' - Expert perspectives on the concept of resilience and its potential for palliative care

Do we practice what we preach? The dissonance between resilience understanding and measurement

Establishing Healthcare Resilience to Cope With Disasters: Theory, Definition and Conceptual Framework

A health systems resilience research agenda: moving from concept to practice

Health system resilience – a conceptual and empirical review of health system literature

What is “hospital resilience”? A scoping review on conceptualization, operationalization, and evaluation

Building an organisational resilience maturity framework

From Burnout to Well-Being: A Focus on Resilience

Resilience Theory and the Practice of Positive Psychology From Individuals to Societies

Hopeless, burned out, and questioning: achieving personal resilience in the midst of organizational turmoil

When resilience becomes undesirable – A cautionary note

Proposing and Developing A Definition and Conceptual Framework for Health Care Resilience to Cope with Disasters

Change Resilience: Learning from Our Patients

Building-up resilience and being effective leaders in the workplace: a systematic review and synthesis model