Microhardness of Human Apical Cementum Related to Fluoride Exposure and Age

R. J. Stepnick,L. Gettleman
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345750540043601
1975-07-01
Abstract:Many investigations have been done on the microhardness of enamel or dentin, but few studlies have been donie on cementum (NIKE, j Osalka U Dent Sc/I 4: 1, 1959; RAUTIOLA and CRAIG, J Peuiodontol 32: 113, 1961; and WARREN FT AL, J Periodontol 35: 505, 1964). Cementum has )eels shown to have a higher concen-tration of fluoride tbhan any other calcified tissue (YARDENI ET AL, Arch Oral Biol 8: 697, 1963; YOON ET At, JADA 61: 565, 1960; and NAKATA FT AL, J Periodontol 43: 115, 1972). The addition of fluoridle to a cavity liner has been shown to increase the fluoride content and microhardness of unclerlying dentin (WOLF ET AL, J Dent Res 52: 467, 1973), whereas extensive studies have shown that fluoride accelerates the rehardening of enamel artificially softened by acids (KOULOURIDES, Art and Science of Dental Caries Researchi, Newv York: Academic Press, Inc, 1968). The purpose of this study was to determine any differences in the microhardness of human cementum in the teeth of residents from areas of different fluoride exposure. Ninety periodontally healthy teeth were collected from lifetime residents of low, optimal, or high natural fluoride areas and were separated into three age groups as shown in the table. Ground sections (750-micrometers [gim] thick) from the apical third of the root were embedded in acrylic and polished using S.C. papers followed by 0.02 gm levigated alumina. The testing apparatusa used a Knoop diamond indenter, 50-gm load, and 15-second dwell time (RYGE ET AL, J Dent Res 40: 1116, 1961). All hardness testing was done by one operator (L.G.) and values were recorded
What problem does this paper attempt to address?