Structural variation between neuropeptide isoforms affects function in the lobster cardiac system

Audrey J Muscato,Daniel J Powell,Warsameh Bulhan,Evalyn S Mackenzie,Alixander Pupo,Madeline Rolph,Andrew E Christie,Patsy S Dickinson
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygcen.2022.114065
2022-10-01
Abstract:Neuronal responses to peptide signaling are determined by the specific binding of a peptide to its receptor(s). For example, isoforms of the same peptide family can drive distinct responses in the same circuit by having different affinities for the same receptor, by having each isoform bind to a different receptor, or by a combination of these scenarios. Small changes in peptide composition can alter the binding kinetics and overall physiological response to a given peptide. In the American lobster (Homarus americanus), native isoforms of C-type allatostatins (AST-Cs) usually decrease heartbeat frequency and alter contraction force. However, one of the three AST-C isoforms, AST-C II, drives a cardiac response distinct from the response elicited by the other two. To investigate the aspects of the peptide that might be responsible for these differential responses, we altered various features of each peptide sequence. Although the presence of an amide group at the end of a peptide sequence (amidation) is often essential for determining physiological function, we demonstrate that C-terminal amidation does not dictate the AST-C response in the lobster cardiac system. However, single amino acid substitution within the consensus sequence did account for many of the differences in specific response characteristics (e.g. contraction frequency or force).
What problem does this paper attempt to address?