Chronotypes in middle‐aged women with polycystic ovary syndrome: A population‐based study

Linnea Kroneld,Päivi Polo‐Kantola,Meri‐Maija Ollila,Riikka K. Arffman,Elisa Hurskainen,Laure Morin‐Papunen,Varpu Jokimaa,Terhi T. Piltonen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.14991
2024-10-20
Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica
Abstract:In this population‐based study, the evening chronotype was not over‐represented in middle‐aged women with PCOS. However, as research in the field is limited and the results are conflicting, further studies are warranted, especially since comorbidity and the risk profile connected with both PCOS and evening chronotype are similar. The present study does not support adding chronotyping to the routine evaluation of women with PCOS. Introduction Circadian rhythm disruption has been associated with the risk of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), as the evening chronotype (EC) shares several traits with PCOS, including metabolic disorders, cardiovascular diseases, and psychiatric disorders. It has been suggested that the biological clock could be targeted with new, preventive, and therapeutic strategies for PCOS in women with biorhythm disorders. We evaluated inner circadian rhythmicity in middle‐aged women with PCOS in a population‐based setting, focusing on whether women with PCOS and an EC have a specific subtype in relation to their clinical characteristics. Material and Methods The data derived from the Northern Finland Birth Cohort, a population‐based longitudinal birth cohort of 12 058 individuals born in 1966. We compared the circadian phenotype between 314 women with PCOS (according to the Rotterdam criteria) and 1248 women without PCOS at age 46 years using the validated Finnish shortened 6‐item Morningness‐Eveningness Questionnaire (sMEQ) and the single‐item self‐assessed morningness‐eveningness question. Results PCOS was not associated with the EC by the sMEQ (p = 0.495) or self‐assessment (p = 0.303). The self‐assessed morningness‐eveningness values differed from the sMEQ chronotype distribution (p
obstetrics & gynecology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?