Bioenergetics of neurotransmitter transport.

B. Kanner

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4173(83)90013-7

1983-12-30

Biochimica et Biophysica Acta

Abstract:

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Psychological and financial impacts of COVID-19-related travel measures: An international cross-sectional study.

Pippa McDermid,Soumya Sooppiyaragath,Adam Craig,Meru Sheel,Katrina Blazek,Siobhan Talty,Holly Seale

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0271894

IF: 3.7

2022-08-07

PLoS ONE

Abstract:The impact of COVID-19 international travel restrictions has to date, not been fully explored, and with the ongoing threat that new variants could potentially restrict movement further, it is important to consider the impacts that travel restrictions have on community members. This study aimed to evaluate the psychological and financial impact of COVID-19 travel restrictions on those separated from their partners or immediate families, as well as temporary visa holders who were unable to migrate. Between 4 November 2021 to 1 December 2021, we executed a cross-sectional online survey targeting three specific groups; (1) those stranded from their partners; (2) those stranded from immediate families; and (3) temporary visa holders unable to migrate or cross international borders. We collected data on respondents' demographic profile; the nature of COVID-19-related travel impacts; depression, anxiety, and stress levels (using the validated DASS-21); and finally, data on respondents financial, employment and accommodation situation. 1363 respondents located globally completed the survey. 71.2% reported financial stress, 76.8% (, SD = 5.94) reported moderate-to-extremely severe depression, 51.6% (, SD = 5.49) moderate-to-extremely severe anxiety, and 62.6% (, SD = 5.55) moderate-to-extremely severe stress levels. Statistically significant factors associated with moderate-to-extremely severe depression, anxiety, and stress included being female, chronic illness, and experiencing financial stress. Employment during COVID-19 –specifically essential services workers or unemployed—was associated with higher levels of anxiety and stress, with only essential workers being a predictor of higher stress severity. Factors that provided psychological protection included being older and having children. This study is one of the first to explore the impact COVID-19-related international travel restrictions have had on the financial status and psychological health of affected individuals. It highlights the significant human cost associated with the restrictions and identifies psychologically vulnerable populations. These results will help the design of targeted health and social policy responses.

multidisciplinary sciences
A cross-sectional investigation of the mental health and wellbeing among individuals who have been negatively impacted by the COVID-19 international border closure in Australia

Kathina Ali,Matthew Iasiello,Joep van Agteren,Teri Mavrangelos,Michael Kyrios,Daniel B. Fassnacht

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-022-00807-7

2022-02-08

Globalization and Health

Abstract:Abstract Background The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in the Australian government implementing strict international border closures. However, research has not yet investigated the mental health status of individuals impacted negatively by these international border closures. Methods The present study was a cross-sectional online survey of 3968 adults who reported being negatively affected by the border closure during June and July 2021. Psychological distress was measured with the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10), stress with the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) and wellbeing with the Mental Health Continuum Short Form (MHC-SF). Results In total, 3968 participants reported being negatively affected by the current restrictions (63.4% in Australia, 36.6% overseas). The vast majority of respondents (83.6%) reported high or very high levels of psychological distress (mean K10 score > 22), and 74.8% reported poor mental wellbeing, with similar risk profiles for participants in Australia or overseas. The most common scenarios of affected individuals included 1) wanting to enter Australia (30.8%), 2) wanting to leave Australia (29.6%) and 3) wanting someone to enter Australia (25.6%). Reasons included wanting to be with partners, family and friends (81.1%), for employment/economic reasons (4.9%), study (4.1%), personal safety/health (2.6%) or holiday (1.4%). While psychological distress was extremely high across all groups, separated partners and those with interrupted study experienced the highest distress (mean K10 = 35.7, n = 155). Conclusion The data suggests a highly elevated mental health risk profile among individuals who report being negatively affected by current Australian international border closures. The results provide valuable data to inform future policy decisions and have clear implications regarding effective service provision for this vulnerable group.

public, environmental & occupational health
Proton decay of an intruder state in 185Bi.

Davids,Woods,Penttilä,Batchelder,Bingham,Blumenthal,Brown,Busse,Conticchio,Davinson,Edward S. Henderson,Irvine,Seweryniak,Tóth,Walters

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PHYSREVLETT.76.592

IF: 8.6

1996-01-22

Physical Review Letters

Abstract:The new proton radioactivity ${}^{185m}\mathrm{Bi}$ has been observed, produced via the ${}^{95}\mathrm{Mo}{(}^{92}\mathrm{Mo},pn{)}^{185}\mathrm{Bi}$ reaction. Its decay proceeds from the low-lying ${\frac{1}{2}}^{+}$ intruder state in ${}^{185}\mathrm{Bi}$ to the ${}^{184}\mathrm{Pb}$ ground state with the emission of a proton of energy $1.585\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.009\mathrm{MeV}$ and a half-life of $44\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}16\ensuremath{\mu}\mathrm{s}$. This marks the first observation of proton radioactivity above the $Z\phantom{\rule{0ex}{0ex}}=\phantom{\rule{0ex}{0ex}}82$ closed shell, and it has been used to obtain the admixture of a ${0}^{+}$ intruder state in ${}^{184}\mathrm{Pb}$ into the ${}^{184}\mathrm{Pb}$ ground-state wave function.
A stress-coping analysis of 'stranded' Australians seeking repatriation during the COVID-19 pandemic

James R. Stewart Alexander J. Mussap School of Psychology,Deakin University,Melbourne,Australia

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00050067.2024.2402234

2024-09-14

Australian Psychologist

Abstract:Objective The COVID-19 pandemic declared in early 2020 led to the closure of Australia's international borders and the stranding of thousands of Australians overseas. We surveyed "stranded" Australians pre- and post-repatriation to evaluate their stress-coping responses at the time and the longer-term impacts of their experience.

psychology, multidisciplinary
Mental Health Impacts of the COVID-19 Pandemic on International University Students, Related Stressors, and Coping Strategies

Agnes Yuen-kwan Lai,Letitia Lee,Man-ping Wang,Yibin Feng,Theresa Tze-kwan Lai,Lai-ming Ho,Veronica Suk-fun Lam,Mary Sau-man Ip,Tai-hing Lam

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.584240

IF: 4.7

2020-11-23

Frontiers in Psychiatry

Abstract:Background: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has disrupted university teaching globally. The mental health impacts on international university students have been overlooked. Aims: This study examined the differences in COVID-19-related stressors and mental health impacts between international university students studying in the UK or USA who returned to their home country or region (returnees) and those who stayed in their institution country (stayers), and identified COVID-19-related stressors and coping strategies that were predictors of mental health. Method: An online questionnaire survey was conducted from April 28 through May 12, 2020 using an exponential, non-discriminative snowball sampling strategy (registered at the National Institutes of Health: NCT04365361). Results: A total of 124 full-time international university students (36.3% male) were included: 75.8% had returned to their home country or region for reasons related to COVID-19; 77.4% were pursuing a bachelor's program, and 53.2% were in programs with practicum component. 84.7% of all students had moderate-to-high perceived stress, 12.1% had moderate-to-severe symptoms of anxiety and depression, and 17.7% had moderate-to-severe symptoms of insomnia. Compared with returnees, stayers had significantly higher stress from COVID-19-related stressors such as personal health and lack of social support (Cohen's d: 0.57–1.11), higher perceived stress [10-item Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10)] {22.6 ± 6.2 vs. 19.1 ± 6.1, β [95% confidence interval (CI)]: 4.039 (0.816, 7.261), Cohen's d: 0.52}, and more severe insomnia symptoms [Insomnia Severity Index (ISI)] [11.8 ± 6.1 vs. 7.6 ± 5.2, β (95% CI): 3.087 (0.262, 5.912), Cohen's d: 0.45], with moderate-to-large effect sizes. Compared with males, females reported significantly higher stress from uncertainties about academic program (Cohen's d: 0.45) with a small effect size. In the total sample, stress related to academics (e.g., personal attainment, uncertainties about academic program, and changes in teaching/learning format), health (including personal health and health of family and friends), availability of reliable COVID-19-related information, and lack of social support predicted more negative mental health impacts. Resilience, positive thinking, and exercise were predictors of less severe mental health impacts. Conclusions: Stayers experienced more adverse mental health impacts than returnees. We call on educators and mental health professionals to provide appropriate support for international students, particularly the stayers, during the pandemic.

psychiatry
Exploring the Psychological Impacts of COVID-19 Social Restrictions on International University Students: A Qualitative Study

Amani Al-Oraibi,Lauren Fothergill,Mehmet Yildirim,Holly Knight,Sophie Carlisle,Mórna O'Connor,Lydia Briggs,Joanne R Morling,Jessica Corner,Jonathan K Ball,Chris Denning,Kavita Vedhara,Holly Blake

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19137631

2022-06-22

Abstract:The global COVID-19 pandemic has impacted on the mental well-being of university students, but little attention has been given to international students, who may have a unique experience and perspective. The aim of this study was to explore the views of international students and university staff towards COVID-19 restrictions, self-isolation, their well-being, and support needs, through eight online focus groups with international students (n = 29) and semi-structured interviews with university staff (n = 17) at a higher education institution in England. Data were analysed using an inductive thematic approach, revealing three key themes and six subthemes: (1) practical, academic, and psychological challenges faced during self-isolation and the COVID-19 pandemic; (2) coping strategies to self-isolation and life during the pandemic; and (3) views on further support needed for international students. International students faced practical, academic, and psychological challenges during the COVID-19 pandemic, particularly relating to the rapid transition to online learning and the impact of social restrictions on integration with peers and well-being. Online social connections with peers, family, or new acquaintances reduced feelings of isolation and encouraged involvement in university life. Despite raising mental health concerns, most international students did not access mental health support services. Staff related this to perceived stigma around mental health in certain cultural groups. In conclusion, international students experienced specific practical and emotional challenges during the pandemic, and are at risk of mental ill-health, but may not actively seek out support from university services. Proactive and personalised approaches to student support will be important for positive student experiences and the retention of students who are studying abroad in the UK higher education system.
Social, financial and psychological stress during an emerging pandemic: observations from a population survey in the acute phase of COVID-19

Rebecca Robillard,Mysa Saad,Jodi Edwards,Elizaveta Solomonova,Marie-Hélène Pennestri,Alexander Daros,Samuel Paul Louis Veissière,Lena Quilty,Karianne Dion,Ashley Nixon,Jennifer Phillips,Raj Bhatla,Edward Spilg,Roger Godbout,Bashour Yazji,Cynda Rushton,Wendy A Gifford,Mamta Gautam,Addo Boafo,Rick Swartz,Tetyana Kendzerska

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043805

IF: 3.006

2020-12-12

BMJ Open

Abstract:Introduction: The negative impacts of COVID-19 have rippled through every facet of society. Understanding the multidimensional impacts of this pandemic is crucial to identify the most critical needs and to inform targeted interventions. This population survey study aimed to investigate the acute phase of the COVID-19 outbreak in terms of perceived threats and concerns, occupational and financial impacts, social impacts and stress between 3 April and 15 May 2020. Methods: 6040 participants are included in this report. A multivariate linear regression model was used to identify factors associated with stress changes (as measured by the Cohen's Perceived Stress Scale (PSS)) relative to pre-outbreak retrospective estimates. Results: On average, PSS scores increased from low stress levels before the outbreak to moderate stress levels during the outbreak (p<0.001). The independent factors associated with stress worsening were: having a mental disorder, female sex, having underage children, heavier alcohol consumption, working with the general public, shorter sleep duration, younger age, less time elapsed since the start of the outbreak, lower stress before the outbreak, worse symptoms that could be linked to COVID-19, lower coping skills, worse obsessive-compulsive symptoms related to germs and contamination, personalities loading on extraversion, conscientiousness and neuroticism, left wing political views, worse family relationships and spending less time exercising and doing artistic activities. Conclusion: Cross-sectional analyses showed a significant increase from low to moderate stress during the COVID-19 outbreak. Identified modifiable factors associated with increased stress may be informative for intervention development. Trial registration number: NCT04369690; Results.
COVID-19-related Traumatic Effects and Psychological Reactions among International Students

Bijia Song,Yilin Zhao,Junchao Zhu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2991/jegh.k.201016.001

2020-01-01

Journal of Epidemiology and Global Health

Abstract:OBJECTIVE: The Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is a public health emergency of international concern and poses a challenge to people's psychological resilience. Students are reported to have greater psychological impacts from COVID-19. This study aimed to survey international students to better understand their traumatic effects and psychological reactions from COVID-19, to develop evidence-driven strategies to reduce adverse psychological impact during the pandemic.METHOD: We conducted an online survey that collected information on the demographics, economic conditions, academic conditions, and health statuses of native Chinese students attending university in the U.S. Psychological impact was assessed by the Post-traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Checklist Civilian Version (PCL-C) and mental health status was assessed by the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale.RESULTS: This study included 261 Chinese international students. In total, 37.5% of respondents' PTSD PCL-C scores measured as moderate or severe. International students who were currently in China facing job-hunting or planning to continue studying abroad, severe economic pressure, and poor self-rated health status were significantly associated with greater PTSD PCL-C scores and higher levels of stress, anxiety, and depression.CONCLUSION: During the COVID-19 pandemic, more than one-third of the respondents rated their PTSD PCL-C score as moderate-to-severe and nearly half of them reported moderate-to-severe anxiety. Our findings identify factors such as future academic plan, economic pressure, and health status are associated with higher levels of psychological impact and worse mental health status. These should receive attention and psychological interventions should be implemented to improve the mental health of international students during the COVID-19 pandemic.

public, environmental & occupational health
Multilevel IRT using dichotomous and polytomous response data.

J. Fox

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1348/000711005X38951

2005-05-01

Abstract:A structural multilevel model is presented where some of the variables cannot be observed directly but are measured using tests or questionnaires. Observed dichotomous or ordinal polytomous response data serve to measure the latent variables using an item response theory model. The latent variables can be defined at any level of the multilevel model. A Bayesian procedure Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC), to estimate all parameters simultaneously is presented. It is shown that certain model checks and model comparisons can be done using the MCMC output. The techniques are illustrated using a simulation study and an application involving students' achievements on a mathematics test and test results regarding management characteristics of teachers and principles.
Sedation in outpatient bronchoscopy.

I. Matot,M. Kramer

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1053/RMED.2000.0926

IF: 4.3

2000-12-01

Respiratory Medicine

Abstract:Bronchoscopy is a procedure that is likely to provoke anxiety as the patient is surrounded by monitoring and bronchoscopy equipment, and care is administered by strangers who perform intimate, invasive, and sometimes, painful procedures. Sedation is needed, therefore, to allay anxiety and reduce stress, improve patient comfort and co-operation, provide amnesia and facilitate the bronchoscopic procedure. In this review we try to summarize the current knowledge on currently used sedation protocols with special reference to the commonly used pharmacological agents. We believe sedation should be used routinely in fiberoptic bronchoscopy in order to achieve a safe and pleasant procedure for both the patient and the pulmonologist.
The economic impact of international travel measures used during the COVID-19 pandemic: a scoping review

Ying Liu Bazak,Beate Sander,Eric Werker,Salta Zhumatova,Catherine Z Worsnop,Kelley Lee

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2023-013900

IF: 8.056

2024-02-01

BMJ Global Health

Abstract:Introduction Assessment of the use of travel measures during COVID-19 has focused on their effectiveness in achieving public health objectives. However, the prolonged use of highly varied and frequently changing measures by governments, and their unintended consequences caused, has been controversial. This has led to a call for coordinated decision-making focused on risk-based approaches, which requires better understanding of the broader impacts of international travel measures (ITMs) on individuals and societies. Methods Our scoping review investigates the literature on the economic impact of COVID-19 ITMs. We searched health, social science and COVID-19-specific databases for empirical studies preprinted or published between 1 January 2020 and 31 October 2023. Evidence was charted using a narrative approach and included jurisdiction of study, ITMs studied, study design, outcome categories, and main findings. Results Twenty-six studies met the inclusion criteria and were included for data extraction. Twelve of them focused on the international travel restrictions implemented in early 2020. Limited attention was given to measures such as entry/exit screening and vaccination requirements. Eight studies focused on high-income countries, 6 on low-income and middle-income countries and 10 studies were comparative although did not select countries by income. Economic outcomes assessed included financial markets (n=13), economic growth (n=4), economic activities (n=1), performance of industries central to international travel (n=9), household-level economic status (n=3) and consumer behaviour (n=1). Empirical methods employed included linear regression (n=17), mathematical modelling (n=3) and mixed strategies (n=6). Conclusion Existing studies have begun to provide evidence of the wide-ranging economic impacts resulting from ITMs. However, the small body of research combined with difficulties in isolating the effects of such measures and limitations in available data mean that it is challenging to draw general and robust conclusions. Future research using rigorous empirical methods and high-quality data is needed on this topic.

public, environmental & occupational health
A Cross-Sectional Study of Sub-Saharan African Migrant Workers across Australia and Canada

Blessing J. Akombi-Inyang,Judith Byaruhanga,Sheila A. Boamah,John Allotey,Prince Atorkey

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph21091127

IF: 4.614

2024-08-28

International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

Abstract:Objective: Ensuring the sustainability of the migrant workforce requires a comprehensive understanding of the psychological challenges faced by this sub-population due to concerns about the wellbeing and financial situation of family members in their home countries. Therefore, this study investigates the factors associated with psychological distress among sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) migrant workers across Australia and Canada during the COVID-19 pandemic. Method: Data were collected from 378 first-generation migrant workers with SSA ancestry residing in Australia and Canada using the Depression Anxiety and Stress Scale 21 (DASS-21). Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to determine socio-demographic factors associated with depression, anxiety, and stress among SSA migrants' populations. Results: Across both countries, migrants with lower levels of education were more prone to reporting feelings of depression, anxiety, and stress during the pandemic. Female participants in Australia were more likely to report feeling of depression. Participants in Australia and Canada who were separated/divorced/widowed were less likely to report stress and depression, respectively. Participants in Australia who had lived in Australia between 11 and 20 years and those between 36 and 50 years old were more likely to report feelings of depression. Participants residing in Australia whose SSA ancestry was Southern Africa/Central Africa were more likely to report anxiety. Participants in Australia who worked as part-time permanent workers and those who worked as fixed-term workers/short-term/casual workers were less likely to report anxiety. Finally, participants in Canada who reported two or more people living with them had higher odds of reporting anxiety. Conclusions: The findings from this study highlight key factors associated with SSA migrant workers' psychological distress during the pandemic. The results can inform policies and provide insight to the development of mental health intervention strategies for migrant workers to minimize similar distress during pandemics.

public, environmental & occupational health,environmental sciences
Psychological Outcomes and Associated Factors Among the International Students Living in China During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Dhedharul Alam,Jing Lu,Li Ni,Shaohua Hu,Yi Xu,Md. Dhedharul Alam

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.707342

IF: 4.7

2021-08-13

Frontiers in Psychiatry

Abstract:Background: The emergence of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has created a severe mental health problem for international students living in China. Despite the little information on the psychological impact on international students, we aimed to assess the psychological outcomes and associated factors among international students currently living in China during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: An online cross-sectional survey was conducted from May 28, 2020 to June 12, 2020 on 402 full-time international students across 26 provinces in China. The frequency of symptoms of depression, anxiety, stress, insomnia, psychological distress, loneliness, and fear was assessed with the English versions of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale (DASS-21), Insomnia Severity Index (ISI), Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K6), University of California, Los Angeles, Loneliness Scale (UCLA-LS), and Fear of COVID-19 scale (FCV-19S) scales, respectively. Results: The prevalence of symptoms of depression (73.4%), anxiety (76.6%), stress (58.5%), insomnia (77.6%), psychological distress (71.4%), loneliness (62.4%), and fear (73.1%) among international students during the COVID-19 pandemic was shown. The prevalence of moderate to extremely severe symptoms of all psychological outcomes was significantly associated with 26–30-year-old students, students who lived with roommates, and students who stayed in China shorter than 2 years. Participants in the central region reported significantly moderate to extremely severe symptom levels of all the psychological outcomes except fear symptoms. Univariate analysis indicated that a significant association of all psychological outcomes was found among 26–30-year-old students and students who stayed in China shorter than 2 years. Multivariate analysis showed that Engineering, Business, Social Sciences and Law, and Language students were significantly associated with the symptoms of depression, anxiety, insomnia, and fear. Participants staying in China for shorter than 2 years were associated with a higher risk of all psychological outcomes except psychological distress and loneliness symptoms. Conclusions: We found a higher prevalence of psychological outcomes and risk factors among international students during the COVID-19 pandemic. We immediately appealed to university authorities, mental health professionals, and government officials to provide mental health interventions and strategies for their international students, particularly young, central region students, living with roommates, different study backgrounds, and short time staying during the pandemic.

psychiatry
The prevalence of psychological distress and its associated sociodemographic factors in the Australian adults aged 18–64 years during COVID-19: Data from the Australian National Health Survey

Putu Novi Arfirsta Dharmayani,Seema Mihrshahi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2024.09.085

IF: 6.533

2024-09-20

Journal of Affective Disorders

Abstract:Objective COVID-19 significantly contributed to an increase in psychological distress and may have disproportionally impacted certain sociodemographic groups. This study aimed to assess the prevalence of psychological distress among Australian adults aged 18–64 years and identify sociodemographic factors associated with psychological distress during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods Secondary analyses were conducted using data from the National Health Survey 2020–21 to calculate weighted national estimates of the prevalence of psychological distress using the Kessler Psychological Distress scale (K10). The association between sociodemographic factors and psychological distress was analysed using multivariable logistic regression, with adjustments for complex survey design. Results The average of K10 score was 16.94, with a prevalence of combined high/very high distress reported at 21.13 % among Australian adults. Young women aged 18–25 reported the highest average scores ( M = 20.44) across all sex and age groups. Risk factors associated with psychological distress included lower personal income, marital status (never married; widowed/divorced/separated) and being 'born in Australia'. Protective factors included homeownership and having children in the household. Additionally, among women, being aged ≥56 was significantly associated with lower odds of psychological distress. Limitations Data collection relied on self-completed online form, and a cross-sectional design limits the inference of a causal relationship. Discussion During COVID-19 pandemic, lower personal income and being female have consistently been identified as risk factors for psychological distress. Targeted and tailored interventions based on age, sex and disadvantage are warranted, particularly focusing on younger women, to alleviate the adverse effect of the pandemic on the population's mental health.

psychiatry,clinical neurology
Understanding the secondary outcomes of international travel measures during the covid-19 pandemic: a scoping review of social impact evidence

Kelley Lee,Salta Zhumatova,Catherine Z Worsnop,Ying Liu Bazak

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-024-01064-6

2024-08-01

Global Health

Abstract:Background: Assessment of the effective use of international travel measures during the COVID-19 pandemic has focused on public health goals, namely limiting virus introduction and onward transmission. However, risk-based approaches includes the weighing of public health goals against potential social, economic and other secondary impacts. Advancing risk-based approaches thus requires fuller understanding of available evidence on such impacts. Methods: We conducted a scoping review of existing studies of the social impacts of international travel measures during the COVID-19 pandemic. Applying a standardized typology of travel measures, and five categories of social impact, we searched 9 databases across multiple disciplines spanning public health and the social sciences. We identified 26 studies for inclusion and reviewed their scope, methods, type of travel measure, and social impacts analysed. Results: The studies cover a diverse range of national settings with a strong focus on high-income countries. A broad range of populations are studied, hindered in their outbound or inbound travel. Most studies focus on 2020 when travel restrictions were widely introduced, but limited attention is given to the broader effects of their prolonged use. Studies primarily used qualitative or mixed methods, with adaptations to comply with public health measures. Most studies focused on travel restrictions, as one type of travel measure, often combined with domestic public health measures, making it difficult to determine their specific social impacts. All five categories of social impacts were observed although there was a strong emphasis on negative social impacts including family separation, decreased work opportunities, reduced quality of life, and inability to meet cultural needs. A small number of countries identified positive social impacts such as restored work-life balance and an increase in perceptions of safety and security. Conclusions: While international travel measures were among the most controversial interventions applied during the COVID-19 pandemic, given their prolonged use and widespread impacts on individuals and populations, there remains limited study of their secondary impacts. If risk-based approaches are to be advanced, involving informed choices between public health and other policy goals, there is a need to better understand such impacts, including their differential impacts across diverse populations and settings.
Long-Term Impact of Economic Downturn and Loneliness on Psychological Distress: Triple Crises of COVID-19 Pandemic

Shuyan Liu,Matthias N. Haucke,Stephan Heinzel,Andreas Heinz

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10194596

IF: 3.9

2021-10-06

Journal of Clinical Medicine

Abstract:Background: The COVID-19 crisis poses global mental health and global economy challenges. However, there is a lack of longitudinal research investigating whether financial instability and social disruption may increase the risk of developing mental health problems over time that may potentially outlast the pandemic. Methods: We conducted an online survey for members of the general population (n = 2703) in Germany during the twelve months spanning from April 2020 to March 2021. We investigated the development of COVID-19 related psychological distress, the number of unemployed people, federal government debt, income distribution, and loneliness over the time period. Results: Over a period of twelve months, 53.6% of respondents in Germany reported experiencing psychological distress, varying from mild levels, 34.2%, to severe levels, 19.4%, of distress. High federal government debt, high incident COVID-19 cases, low incomes, and the prevalence of loneliness were found to be associated with increased long-term mental health problems. Psychological distress scores were most strongly increased in female and young respondents as well as those who reported fewer years of education, low income, and higher loneliness. Conclusions: Our study highlights factors that have a long-term impact on mental health amid the COVID-19 pandemic. We suggest that specific mental-health services could be offered to support high-risk groups experiencing financial fragility and loneliness. For purposes of safeguarding their mental health there is a need to monitor and track such risk factors in real time.

medicine, general & internal
Multifaceted Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic and Lockdown on Physical and Mental Health: Insights from a Cross-Sectional Study

V. Dimitriou,C. Kalogirou,A. Potamianou,M. Bakola,P. Gourzis,G. Charalampous,E. Jelastopulu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2024.1073

2024-08-30

European Psychiatry

Abstract:Introduction The global COVID-19 pandemic and subsequent lockdowns have significantly impacted global wellbeing and highlighted the close link between mental and physical health. Social isolation and quarantine have proven to be major stressors, leading to emotional distress and unpredictable psychological consequences. Objectives We explored the pandemic's impact on individuals' physical and mental health and social relationships. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional study using a questionnaire which included among other socio-democratic questions, the Fear of COVID-19 Scale, the World Health Organization Quality-of-Life Scale (WHOQOL-BREF) and the Toronto Empathy Questionnaire (TEQ). Results A total of 511 adults (55.1% males) participated in this study. Participants reported increased social media use (more than 4-5 times/week) during the lockdown, which was associated with increased fear of COVID-19 and negative effects on mental and physical health, and social relationships (p<0.01). Conversely, non-work-related outings (once a week) were associated with lower fear (p<0.01) and better well-being (p<0.05). Higher fear, particularly for loved ones, was associated with negative effects. The level of physical health was moderate to high, with varying levels of satisfaction in different areas. Empathy correlated with increased fear (p<0.01) and reduced mobility (p<0.05). Conclusions The COVID-19 pandemic and lockdowns significantly affected physical and mental health, highlighting the importance of tailoring interventions for vulnerable populations and promoting adaptive coping strategies in times of crisis. Disclosure of Interest None Declared

psychiatry
Mechanism by which MLO-A5 Late Osteoblasts/Early Osteocytes Mineralize in Culture: Similarities with Mineralization of Lamellar Bone

Cielo Barragan-Adjemian,D. Nicolella,V. Dusevich,Mark Dallas,J. Eick,Lynda F. Bonewald

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00223-006-0107-2

2006-11-14

Calcified Tissue International

Abstract:
Student mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic: Are international students more affected?

Liia Kivelä,Joanne Mouthaan,Willem van der Does,Niki Antypa

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07448481.2022.2037616

2022-02-14

Journal of American College Health

Abstract:Background: The psychological well-being of students may be especially affected by the COVID-19 pandemic; international students can lack local support systems and represent a higher risk subgroup. Methods: Self-reported depressive symptoms, suicidal ideation, anxiety, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), insomnia, alcohol use, academic stress, and loneliness were examined in two cohorts of university students (March 2020 n = 207, March 2021 n = 142). We investigated differences i) between 2020 and 2021, ii) between domestic and international students, and ii) whether differences between the two cohorts were moderated by student status. Results: More depressive symptoms, academic stress, and loneliness were reported in 2021. International students reported more depressive symptoms, suicidal ideation, anxiety, PTSD, academic stress, and loneliness. The main effect of cohort was not moderated by student status. Conclusions: International students had worse mental health outcomes overall, but were not affected more by the COVID-19 pandemic than domestic students.

public, environmental & occupational health,education & educational research
Investigating the impact of COVID‐19 on international student wellbeing in Australia

Bettina Backman,Neetu George,Bianca Whiteside,Fiona H. McKay,Matthew Dunn

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/hpja.926

2024-09-26

Health Promotion Journal of Australia

Abstract:Issue Addressed International students are at a heightened risk of experiencing negative health and wellbeing outcomes, which was further exacerbated during the COVID‐19 lockdowns. This research sought to explore the impact of the COVID‐19 pandemic on the health and wellbeing of international students in Australia. Methods Thirty‐one international students participated in qualitative in‐depth interviews between March and April 2022 to explore their experiences of health and wellbeing during 2020–2021 while they lived and studied in Australia. Interviews were coded and analysed thematically using NVivo software. Results Findings highlight the impact of the pandemic on international students' mental, social and financial wellbeing, including worry about loved ones, social isolation, financial and employment insecurity and challenges related to online learning. The pandemic exacerbated and brought more attention to existing issues and placed students in unequal positions in relation to domestic students and each other. Conclusions The COVID‐19 pandemic has increased students' vulnerability to poor mental health and to a range of social and financial issues. So What? The findings of this study highlight the need for support strategies to improve international students' mental health and social wellbeing outcomes in Australia.

public, environmental & occupational health

Bioenergetics of neurotransmitter transport.

Psychological and financial impacts of COVID-19-related travel measures: An international cross-sectional study.

A cross-sectional investigation of the mental health and wellbeing among individuals who have been negatively impacted by the COVID-19 international border closure in Australia

Proton decay of an intruder state in 185Bi.

A stress-coping analysis of 'stranded' Australians seeking repatriation during the COVID-19 pandemic

Mental Health Impacts of the COVID-19 Pandemic on International University Students, Related Stressors, and Coping Strategies

Exploring the Psychological Impacts of COVID-19 Social Restrictions on International University Students: A Qualitative Study

Social, financial and psychological stress during an emerging pandemic: observations from a population survey in the acute phase of COVID-19

COVID-19-related Traumatic Effects and Psychological Reactions among International Students

Multilevel IRT using dichotomous and polytomous response data.

Sedation in outpatient bronchoscopy.

The economic impact of international travel measures used during the COVID-19 pandemic: a scoping review

A Cross-Sectional Study of Sub-Saharan African Migrant Workers across Australia and Canada

Psychological Outcomes and Associated Factors Among the International Students Living in China During the COVID-19 Pandemic

The prevalence of psychological distress and its associated sociodemographic factors in the Australian adults aged 18–64 years during COVID-19: Data from the Australian National Health Survey

Understanding the secondary outcomes of international travel measures during the covid-19 pandemic: a scoping review of social impact evidence

Long-Term Impact of Economic Downturn and Loneliness on Psychological Distress: Triple Crises of COVID-19 Pandemic

Multifaceted Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic and Lockdown on Physical and Mental Health: Insights from a Cross-Sectional Study

Mechanism by which MLO-A5 Late Osteoblasts/Early Osteocytes Mineralize in Culture: Similarities with Mineralization of Lamellar Bone

Student mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic: Are international students more affected?

Investigating the impact of COVID‐19 on international student wellbeing in Australia