Critical Assessment of Metagenome Interpretation—a benchmark of metagenomics software
Alexander Sczyrba,Peter Hofmann,Peter Belmann,David Koslicki,Stefan Janssen,Johannes Dröge,Ivan Gregor,Stephan Majda,Jessika Fiedler,Eik Dahms,Andreas Bremges,Adrian Fritz,Ruben Garrido-Oter,Tue Sparholt Jørgensen,Nicole Shapiro,Philip D Blood,Alexey Gurevich,Yang Bai,Dmitrij Turaev,Matthew Z DeMaere,Rayan Chikhi,Niranjan Nagarajan,Christopher Quince,Fernando Meyer,Monika Balvočiūtė,Lars Hestbjerg Hansen,Søren J Sørensen,Burton K H Chia,Bertrand Denis,Jeff L Froula,Zhong Wang,Robert Egan,Dongwan Don Kang,Jeffrey J Cook,Charles Deltel,Michael Beckstette,Claire Lemaitre,Pierre Peterlongo,Guillaume Rizk,Dominique Lavenier,Yu-Wei Wu,Steven W Singer,Chirag Jain,Marc Strous,Heiner Klingenberg,Peter Meinicke,Michael D Barton,Thomas Lingner,Hsin-Hung Lin,Yu-Chieh Liao,Genivaldo Gueiros Z Silva,Daniel A Cuevas,Robert A Edwards,Surya Saha,Vitor C Piro,Bernhard Y Renard,Mihai Pop,Hans-Peter Klenk,Markus Göker,Nikos C Kyrpides,Tanja Woyke,Julia A Vorholt,Paul Schulze-Lefert,Edward M Rubin,Aaron E Darling,Thomas Rattei,Alice C McHardy
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.4458
IF: 48
2017-10-02
Nature Methods
Abstract:The Critical Assessment of Metagenome Interpretation (CAMI) community initiative presents results from its first challenge, a rigorous benchmarking of software for metagenome assembly, binning and taxonomic profiling.
biochemical research methods