Comparison Analyses of the Functional Groups of Natural Enemy in Transgenic Bt-cotton Field and Non-transgenic Cotton Fields with IPM, and Chemical Control
Wanping Fang
2002-01-01
Abstract:Based on the survey in 1997, a further systematic survey was made in a transgenic Bt cotton field and two non-transgenic cotton fields (one with IPM, one with chemical control) in Nanpi county, Hebei province, in 1998. The main purposes for this research were to understand the time-space dynamics of the different functional groups in different types of cotton fields, and work out a new IPM strategy in transgenic Bt cotton fields. In an area of 0.3 hm 2 for each field, 10 plants in 10 spots were fixed for sampling. The populations of the target insect pest, Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner), its predators and parasitoids were observed every 5-days from May to October. The natural enemies were classified into six groups: ladybirds, lacewings, predatory bugs, spiders, parasitic wasps and other predators. Compared to the conventional IPM and the chemically controlled cotton fields, we found that: (1) The total numbers of predators and parasitoids species in the transgenic Bt cotton field were 57; higher than in the other two fields by 16.3% and 54.1%, respectively; (2) The total number of individual predators were 2757 in transgenic Bt cotton field, higher by 52.8% and 176.3%, than in the two non-Bt fields, respectively; (3) The total number of parasitic wasps (Microplitis mediatar and Campoletis chlorideae ) in transgenic Bt cotton field was 16, decreased by 42.9% and 52.9%, respectively; (4) Larval parasitism of cotton bollworm in transgenic Bt cotton field was only 0%～5.0%, while in the non-Bt cotton fields parasitism was 11.1%～65.0% for the second generation of H. armigera, and 4.1%～66.2% for the third generation; (5) The numbers of ladybirds (Propylaea japonica, Coccinella septempunctata, and others) and lacewings (Chrysopa spp.) in transgenic Bt cotton fields were 724 and 49, decreased by 8.4% and 5.8% compared with the IPM cotton field, but higher by 34.1% and 206.3% when compared with the chemically controlled cotton field; (6) The numbers of predatory bugs (Orius spp., Campylomma diversicornis, Nabis spp. and others) and spiders in transgenic Bt cotton fields increased by 180.6% and 71.2%, compared to the IPM cotton field, and increased by 329.1% and 483.7% compared to the chemically controlled cotton field; and (7) The diversity of natural enemy groups increased by 10.1% and 24.1%, respectively. In transgenic Bt cotton field, the number of predators reached a peak in mid-August. By numbers, the dominant natural enemy group was ladybirds in the early season, predatory bugs and spiders in mid-season, while spiders and predatory bugs during the late-stage of cotton growth. Compared to the chemically controlled cotton field, predators in the IPM cotton field were quicker to reinvade the field. Ladybirds seemed to reinvade first, followed by predatory bugs and spiders. Niche width indices of all predator groups in the three types of cotton fields were 0.85, 0.81 and 0.72, respectively. This indicated that the spatial dynamics of all predators was very similar. The abundances of all predator groups in the upper part of plant in the three types of cotton fields were 0.406, 38.2 and 43.7, respectively; not significantly different from each other. However, there were significant differences during the different generations of cotton bollworm. In each type of cotton field, predators in the upper part of plant were most abundant during the second generation of H.armigera (abundance value was 0.706, 0.517 and 0.594, respectively). During the third generation of H.armigera, the abundances were lower (0.346, 0.419 and 0.499 respectively). These results showed that the transgenic Bt cotton field helped to conserve ladybirds and lacewings, and supported higher numbers of predatory bugs and spiders. The predator community in transgenic Bt cotton field was more stable than that of either the IPM or the chemically controlled cotton field. Based on the above analyses, the management measures for different generations of cotton bollworm in different eco-type cotton fields were worked out.