Manual Therapy in Primary Dysmenorrhea: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/jpr.s457381
IF: 2.8319
2024-05-06
Journal of Pain Research
Abstract:Xia Li, 1, &ast Yanan Sun, 2, &ast Yuhan Wang, 1 Xiyou Wang, 1 Changhe Yu 1 1 Tuina and Pain Management Department, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine Affiliated Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China; 2 Traditional Chinese Medicine Department, Xuanwu Hospital Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China &astThese authors contributed equally to this work Correspondence: Xiyou Wang; Changhe Yu, Email ; Objective: This research aimed to assess the effectiveness of manual therapy in alleviating pain among women undergoing primary dysmenorrhea (PD). Methods: All randomized controlled trials (RCTs) regarding manual therapy for PD were searched from online databases, spanning from their inception to July 2023. The identified literature underwent a thorough screening process, and the data were meticulously extracted and analyzed using RevMan 5.3. Subsequently, the included studies underwent Cochrane's quality assessment and meta-analysis. The evidence obtained was then assessed using the grading of recommendations, assessment, development, and evaluation (GRADE) approach. Results: 32 RCTs, involving 2566 women were finally included for analysis. The overall quality of the concluding evidence was generally rated as low or very low. Performance bias and blind bias were found to be the main risk of bias of the included studies. In comparison to no treatment, manual therapy demonstrated a significant increase in pain relief in short-term (n=191, MD=1.30, 95% CI: 0.24~2.37). The differences in the effects of manual therapy and the placebo on pain intensity may not be statistically significant (n=255, MD=0.10, 95% CI: − 0.37~0.58). In contrast to NSAIDs, manual therapy exhibited superior pain alleviation (n=507, MD=3.01, 95% CI: 1.08~4.94) and a higher effective rate (n=1029, OR=4.87, 95% CI: 3.29~7.20). Importantly, no severe adverse events were reported across all studies, indicating a relatively safe profile for manual therapy. Conclusion: Manual therapy presented promise in effectively relieving menstrual pain with minimal adverse events in short term, outperforming both no treatment and NSAIDs. However, this conclusion is tempered by the low quality of the included RCTs, highlighting the necessity for more robust trials to validate it. Keywords: primary dysmenorrhea, manual therapy, meta-analysis, systematic review Primary dysmenorrhea (PD) is defined as painful menstruation in the absence of pelvic pathology and is characterized by recurrent, crampy, lower abdominal pain during menstruation, affecting 50–90% of women. 1 Among them, 15–50% of women with moderate to severe symptoms find their daily activities, including work, school, or other activities, disrupted. 2 The adverse effects of PD extend beyond physical discomfort, affecting performance by reducing attention and productivity. 3,4 The guidelines recommend the use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) as the primary therapeutic approach for PD. 5 Nevertheless, a subset of individuals fails to relieve their pain with NSAIDs and, instead, may experience undesirable side effects such as nausea, dyspepsia, headaches, or insomnia. 6 The non-pharmacological and non-invasive therapies are endorsed to manage dysmenorrhea symptoms, including acupuncture, biofeedback, heat treatments, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, exercises, and manual therapy. 7,8 Manual therapy, a specialized branch of physical therapy, employing skilled hands-on techniques to assess, diagnose, and treat musculoskeletal and neuromuscular conditions. This therapeutic approach encompasses a variety of hands-on techniques, including massage, acupressure, holographic therapy, spinal manipulative therapy and more. The utilization of manual treatment for PD remains controversial. Manual therapy, either in isolation or in combination with other treatment modalities, has demonstrated potential advantages for overall health with a low reported risk of adverse effects. 9 In contrast, in 2006, a Cochrane systematic review indicated inadequate evidence to substantiate the efficacy of manual therapy in alleviating pain for women with dysmenorrhea. 10 Given these divergent viewpoints, this research was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of manual therapy for PD, utilizing updated data and comparing its effects with no treatment, placebo or first-line treatment. This meta-analysis adhered to the guidelines outlined in the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines ( Table S1 ). 11 The study protocol was registered -Abstract Truncated-
clinical neurology