Causality of abdominal obesity on cognition: a trans-ethnic Mendelian randomization study

Shi-Heng Wang,Mei-Hsin Su,Chia-Yen Chen,Yen-Feng Lin,Yen-Chen A Feng,Po-Chang Hsiao,Yi-Jiun Pan,Chi-Shin Wu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41366-022-01138-8
Abstract:Background: Obesity has been associated with cognition in observational studies; however, whether its effect is confounding or a reverse causality remains inconclusive. This study aimed to investigate the causal relationships of overall obesity, measured by body mass index (BMI), and abdominal adiposity, measured by waist-hip ratio adjusted for BMI (WHRadjBMI), and cognition across European and Asian populations using Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis. Methods: We used publicly available genome-wide association study (GWAS) summary data of European ancestry, including BMI (n = 322,154) and WHRadjBMI (n = 210,088) from the GIANT consortium, and cognition performance (n = 257,828) from the UK Biobank and COGENT consortium. Data for individuals of Asian ancestry were retrieved from Taiwan Biobank to perform GWAS for BMI (n = 65,689), WHRadjBMI (n = 65,683), and Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE, n = 21,273). MR analysis was carried out using the inverse-variance weighted method for the main results. Further, we examined the overall pleiotropy by MR-Egger intercept, and detected and adjusted for possible outliers using MR PRESSO. Results: No causal effect of BMI on cognition performance (beta [95% CI] = 0.00 [-0.07, 0.07], p value = 0.91) was found for Europeans; however, a 1-SD increase in WHRadjBMI was associated with a 0.07 standardized score decrease in cognition performance (beta [95% CI] = -0.07 [-0.12, -0.02], p value = 0.006). Further, no causal effect of BMI on MMSE (beta [95% CI] = 0.01 [-0.08, 0.10], p = 0.91) was found for Asians; however, a 1-SD increase in WHRadjBMI was associated with a 0.17 standardized score decrease in MMSE (beta [95% CI] = -0.17 [-0.30, -0.03], p = 0.02). In both populations, overall pleiotropy was not detected, and outliers did not affect the robustness of the main findings. Conclusions: This trans-ethnic MR study reveals that abdominal adiposity, as measured by WHR adjusted for BMI, impairs cognition, whereas weak evidence suggests that BMI impairs cognition.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?