Abstract:We conducted a small-scale study to investigate if a brief timely intervention focusing on specific study strategies would improve student performance in university science courses. We targeted low-performing students after the first midterm exam in two courses (enrollments of 67 and 185) with different student populations, one with students in a very selective physics program and the other with a broad range of students in a general science elective course. In this intervention, instructors either met personally with students or sent them a personalized e-mail. Students who met with an instructor and discussed specific study strategies improved their performance from one exam to the next by up to 32 ± 7%, without increasing their study time. These students also reported changing their study strategies during the term more than other students. Students who received an e-mail also improved their performance but not more than would be expected without an intervention. These results show that a focused discussion advising a small number of specific study strategies can have a large impact on the lowest-performing students in contexts in which the new study strategies are aligned with course structure, expectations, and assessments. This is in sharp contrast to results obtained from most general study-skills interventions. M ost postsecondary science teachers are familiar with a depressing pattern: scores on early exams and assignments seem to establish how well nearly all the students will do in a course. Nothing the professor does in the many subsequent weeks of instruction seems to help students who start out poorly and countless unpublished examples illustrate optional educational interventions that were intended to improve the performance of low-performing , postsecondary science students but were unsuccessful. These interventions include providing extra review sessions, practice problems, additional office hours, help rooms, and more. The high-performing students typically avail themselves of these additional resources and improve , whereas the lower performing students do not low performers self-motivated to seek help can show substantial gains with course-specific coaching Purdie's (1996) comprehensive meta-analysis of general learning skills interventions with university students found that " the effects on study skills are minimal " (p. 126). A likely reason for this failure is that general study skills interventions are too broad in their scope and too distant from where they will be applied. General studies in psychology show that goals that are specific and reasonably achievable in the short run are effective at improving performance, …

Does supportive feedback on class rank improve scores for intermediate-level microeconomics?

One email to students: Can a light touch intervention make a difference?

Incentive Matters!—The Benefit of Reminding Students about Their Academic Standing in Introductory Economics Courses

Grading policy, email nudges, and grade outcomes

Can leagues mitigate the demoralisation effect of rank feedback? A randomized controlled trial

Pushing Through or Slacking Off? Heterogeneity in the Reaction to Rank Feedback

Exam Credits and Exam Performance in University Economics Courses − Evidence from a Regression Discontinuity Experiment

Transforming the Lowest-Performing Students: An Intervention that Worked.

Interactive Learning with Student Response System to Encourage Students to Provide Peer Feedback

Giving Feedback on Feedback: An Assessment of Grader Feedback Construction on Student Performance

Regulatory fit explains the effects of speech grades on students’ intended effort

From SIGNALS to success? The effects of an online advising system on course grades

Do Experiences of Interactional Inequality Predict Lower Depth of Future Student Participation in Peer Review?

When Do Students Provide More Peer Feedback? the Roles of Performance and Prior Feedback Experiences

Two-Tier Instant-Feedback Assessment Strategy for Improvement of Student Concentration

Who Can Benefit More From More or Less Elaborated Feedback in a Computer-Based Assessment? Dominant Goal Orientation Matters

Narrowing the Feedback Gap: Examining Student Engagement with Personalized and Actionable Feedback Messages

Oral presentations in higher education: a comparison of the impact of peer and teacher feedback

Learning to Improve the Quality Peer Feedback Through Experience with Peer Feedback

Teaching Methods in Undergraduate Intermediate Theory, Statistics and Econometrics, and Other Upper-Division Economics Courses: Results From a Sixth National Quinquennial Survey

Enhancing Self-Efficacy and Learning Performance