Rights discourse and neonatal euthanasia.

C. Schneider
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15779/Z38G441
IF: 3.118
California Law Review
Abstract:In the attempt to defend the principle that needs do make rights, it is possible to forget about the range of needs which cannot be specified as rights and to let them slip out of the language of politics. Rights language offers a rich vernacular for the claims an individual may make on or against the collectivity, but it is relatively impoverished as a means of expressing individuals' needs for the collectivity. It can only express the human ideal of fraternity as mutual respect for rights, and it can only defend the claim to be treated with dignity in terms of our common identity as rights-bearing creatures .... The administrative good conscience of our time seems to consist in respecting individuals' rights while demeaning them as persons. Michael Ignatieff1
What problem does this paper attempt to address?