Nonsense mutations in KRT1 caused recessive epidermolytic palmoplantar keratoderma with knuckle pads

R Mo,M Lin,M Lee,W Yan,H Wang,Z Lin
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jdv.18189
Abstract:Background: Epidermolytic palmoplantar keratoderma (EPPK) is characterized by diffuse hyperkeratosis affecting palms and soles with suprabasal epidermolysis or vacuolar degeneration histopathologically. The disorder is caused by heterozygous mutations in KRT9 or KRT1. Dominant-negative mutations in KRT1 could also result in epidermolytic ichthyosis with EPPK, a more severe entity affecting the entire body. Objective: To investigate the genetic basis and pathogenesis of two unrelated patients with EPPK and knuckle pads, both of whom were born to consanguineous parents of Chinese origin. Methods: Next-generation sequencing was applied to the two patients using genomic DNA extracted from peripheral blood. Quantitative reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR), immunofluorescence (IF) staining and Western blot (WB) were employed to evaluate mRNA and protein expression level. Ultrastructural changes of skin lesion were analysed using transmission electron microscopy. Results: Two novel homozygous mutations, c.457C>T (p.Gln153*) and c.33C>G (p.Tyr11*) in KRT1, were identified in patients 1 and 2 respectively. The nonsense mutations were predicted to result in nonsense-mediated mRNA decay and absence of keratin 1, which was confirmed in the skin lesions from patient 1. Upregulated keratin 2 was detected both in the affected and unaffected skin samples from patient 1, while the protein abundance and distribution pattern of keratin 10 remained unchanged. An aberrant and clumped staining pattern of keratin 9 was noted in the palmar skin of patient 1. Conclusions: Homozygous 'knockout' mutations in KRT1 resulted in EPPK with knuckle pads rather than epidermolytic ichthyosis. We speculated that sparing of non-acral skin might be due to compensatory effect of keratin 2 upregulation by forming heterodimer with keratin 10.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?