Environmental Factors for Epstein-Barr Virus Reactivation in a High-Risk Area of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: A Population-Based Study

Yufeng Chen,Ellen T Chang,Qing Liu,Yonglin Cai,Zhe Zhang,Guomin Chen,Qi-Hong Huang,Shang-Hang Xie,Su-Mei Cao,Wei-Hua Jia,Yuming Zheng,Yancheng Li,Longde Lin,Ingemar Ernberg,Guangwu Huang,Yi-Xin Zeng,Hans-Olov Adami,Weimin Ye
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofac128
2022-03-15
Abstract:Background: Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) reactivation from latent to lytic infection has been considered as a key step in nasopharyngeal carcinoma oncogenesis. However, epidemiological evidence regarding environmental risk factors for EBV reactivation on a population level remains largely lacking. Methods: We enrolled 1916 randomly selected adults from the general population of Guangdong and Guangxi, China, from 2010 to 2014. Information on environmental factors was collected via a structured interview. Serum immunoglobulin A antibodies against EBV viral capsid antigen and nuclear antigen 1 were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay to evaluate EBV reactivation status. We used logistic regression to calculate odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the associations of EBV reactivation with various environmental factors. Results: No associations were observed between EBV reactivation and extensive environmental factors, including alcohol or tea drinking, a history of chronic ear/nose/throat diseases, use of medications or herbs, consumption of salted fish or preserved foods, oral hygiene, sibship structure, and various residential and occupational exposures. Only cigarette smoking was associated with EBV reactivation (current smokers vs never smokers; OR = 1.37; 95% CI = 1.02-1.83), with positive exposure-response trends with increasing intensity, duration, and pack-years of smoking. Conclusions: Consistent with previous studies, we found an association between cigarette smoking and EBV reactivation. Other examined exposures were not associated with EBV reactivation. These null results could suggest either more complex interactions between exposures and EBV reactivation or a predominant role of host and/or viral genetic variation.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?