Longitudinal monitoring by next-generation sequencing of plasma cell-free DNA in ALK rearranged NSCLC patients treated with ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors

Minsuk Kwon,Bo Mi Ku,Steve Olsen,Sehhoon Park,Martina Lefterova,Justin Odegaard,Hyun-Ae Jung,Jong-Mu Sun,Se-Hoon Lee,Jin Seok Ahn,Keunchil Park,Myung-Ju Ahn
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.4663
Abstract:Background: Patients with ALK-rearranged non-small cell lung cancer (ALK+ NSCLC) inevitably acquire resistance to ALK inhibitors. Longitudinal monitoring of cell-free plasma DNA (cfDNA) next-generation sequencing (NGS) could predict the response and resistance to tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy in ALK+ NSCLC. Methods: Patients with ALK+ NSCLC determined by standard tissue testing and planned to undergo TKI therapy were prospectively recruited. Plasma was collected at pretreatment, 2 months-post therapy, and at progression for cfDNA-NGS analysis, Guardant 360. Results: Among 92 patients enrolled, circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) was detected in 69 baseline samples (75%): 43 ALK fusions (62.3%) and two ALK mutations without fusion (2.8%). Two patients showed ALK-resistance mutations after ceritinib; G1202R, and co-occurring G1202R and T1151R. Eight patients developed ALK resistance mutations after crizotinib therapy; L1196M (n = 5), G1269A (n = 1), G1202R (n = 1), and co-occurring F1174L, G1202R, and G1269A (n = 1). Absence of ctDNA at baseline was significantly associated with longer progression-free survival (PFS; median 36.1 vs. 11.4 months, p = 0.0049) and overall survival (OS; not reached vs. 29.3 months, p = 0.0200). ctDNA clearance at 2 months (n = 29) was associated with significantly longer PFS (25.4 vs. 11.6 months, p = 0.0012) and OS (not reached vs. 26.1 months, p = 0.0307) than those without clearance (n = 22). Patients with co-occurring TP53 alterations and ALK fusions at baseline (n = 16) showed significantly shorter PFS (7.28 vs. 13.0 months, p = 0.0307) than those without TP53 alterations (n = 25). Conclusions: cfDNA-NGS facilitates detection of ALK fusions and resistance mutations, assessment of prognosis, and monitoring dynamic changes of genomic alterations in ALK+ NSCLC treated with ALK-TKI.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?