A comparative transcriptomic analysis of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor- and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide receptor-expressing cells in the hypothalamus

Christopher Smith,Ryan Patterson-Cross,Orla Woodward,Jo Lewis,Davide Chiarugi,Florian Merkle,Fiona Gribble,Frank Reimann,Alice Adriaenssens
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2022.106022
IF: 5.016
2022-07-01
Appetite
Abstract:Objective: The hypothalamus is a key region of the brain implicated in homeostatic regulation, and is an integral centre for the control of feeding behaviour. Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) are incretin hormones with potent glucoregulatory function through engagement of their respective cognate receptors, GLP-1R and GIPR. Recent evidence indicates that there is a synergistic effect of combining GIP- and GLP-1-based pharmacology on appetite and body weight. The mechanisms underlying the enhanced weight loss exhibited by GIPR/GLP-1R co-agonism are unknown. Gipr and Glp1r are expressed in the hypothalamus in both rodents and humans. To better understand incretin receptor-expressing cell populations, we compared the cell types and expression profiles of Gipr- and Glp1r-expressing hypothalamic cells using single-cell RNA sequencing. Methods: Using Glp1r-Cre or Gipr-Cre transgenic mouse lines, fluorescent reporters were introduced into either Glp1r- or Gipr-expressing cells, respectively, upon crossing with a ROSA26-EYFP reporter strain. From the hypothalami of these mice, fluorescent Glp1rEYFP+ or GiprEYFP+ cells were FACS-purified and sequenced using single-cell RNA sequencing. Transcriptomic analysis provided a survey of both non-neuronal and neuronal cells, and comparisons between Glp1rEYFP+ and GiprEYFP + populations were made. Results: A total of 14,091 Glp1rEYFP+ and GiprEYFP+ cells were isolated, sequenced and taken forward for bioinformatic analysis. Both Glp1rEYFP+ and GiprEYFP+ hypothalamic populations were transcriptomically highly heterogeneous, representing vascular cell types, oligodendrocytes, astrocytes, microglia, and neurons. The majority of GiprEYFP+ cells were non-neuronal, whereas the Glp1rEYFP+ population was evenly split between neuronal and non-neuronal cell types. Both Glp1rEYFP+ and GiprEYFP+ oligodendrocytes express markers for mature, myelin-forming oligodendrocytes. While mural cells are represented in both Glp1rEYFP+ and GiprEYFP+ populations, Glp1rEYFP+ mural cells are largely smooth muscle cells, while the majority of GiprEYFP+ mural cells are pericytes. The co-expression of regional markers indicate that clusters of Glp1rEYFP+ and GiprEYFP+ neurons have been isolated from the arcuate, ventromedial, lateral, tuberal, suprachiasmatic, and premammillary nuclei of the hypothalamus. Conclusions: We have provided a detailed comparison of Glp1r and Gipr cells of the hypothalamus with single-cell resolution. This resource will provide mechanistic insight into how engaging Gipr- and Glp1r-expressing cells of the hypothalamus may result in changes in feeding behaviour and energy balance.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?