Interdisciplinary consensus statements on imaging of DRUJ instability and TFCC injuries
Luis Cerezal,Francisco del Piñal,Andrea Atzei,Rainer Schmitt,Fabio Becce,Maciej Klich,Maciej Bień,Milko C. de Jonge,James Teh,Robert Downey Boutin,Andoni Paul Toms,Patrick Omoumi,Jan Fritz,Alberto Bazzocchi,Maryam Shahabpour,Marco Zanetti,Eva Llopis,Alain Blum,Radhesh Krishna Lalam,Sutter Reto,P. Diana Afonso,Vasco V. Mascarenhas,Anne Cotten,Jean-Luc Drapé,Guillaume Bierry,Grzegorz Pracoń,Danoob Dalili,Marc Mespreuve,Marc Garcia-Elias,Gregory Ian Bain,Christophe L. Mathoulin,Luc Van Overstraeten,Robert M. Szabo,Emmanuel J. Camus,Riccardo Luchetti,Adrian Julian Chojnowski,Joerg G. Gruenert,Piotr Czarnecki,Fernando Corella,Ladislav Nagy,Michiro Yamamoto,Igor O. Golubev,Jörg van Schoonhoven,Florian Goehtz,Iwona Sudoł-Szopińska,Tobias Johannes Dietrich
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-023-09698-7
IF: 7.034
2023-05-16
European Radiology
Abstract:AbstractObjectivesThe purpose of this agreement was to establish evidence-based consensus statements on imaging of distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) instability and triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) injuries by an expert group using the Delphi technique.MethodsNineteen hand surgeons developed a preliminary list of questions on DRUJ instability and TFCC injuries. Radiologists created statements based on the literature and the authors’ clinical experience. Questions and statements were revised during three iterative Delphi rounds. Delphi panelists consisted of twenty-seven musculoskeletal radiologists. The panelists scored their degree of agreement to each statement on an 11-item numeric scale. Scores of “0,” “5,” and “10” reflected complete disagreement, indeterminate agreement, and complete agreement, respectively. Group consensus was defined as a score of “8” or higher for 80% or more of the panelists.ResultsThree of fourteen statements achieved group consensus in the first Delphi round and ten statements achieved group consensus in the second Delphi round. The third and final Delphi round was limited to the one question that did not achieve group consensus in the previous rounds.ConclusionsDelphi-based agreements suggest that CT with static axial slices in neutral rotation, pronation, and supination is the most useful and accurate imaging technique for the work-up of DRUJ instability. MRI is the most valuable technique in the diagnosis of TFCC lesions. The main indication for MR arthrography and CT arthrography are Palmer 1B foveal lesions of the TFCC.Clinical relevance statementMRI is the method of choice for assessing TFCC lesions, with higher accuracy for central than peripheral abnormalities. The main indication for MR arthrography is the evaluation of TFCC foveal insertion lesions and peripheral non-Palmer injuries.Key points• Conventional radiography should be the initial imaging technique in the assessment of DRUJ instability. CT with static axial slices in neutral rotation, pronation, and supination is the most accurate method for evaluating DRUJ instability.• MRI is the most useful technique in diagnosing soft-tissue injuries causing DRUJ instability, especially TFCC lesions.• The main indications for MR arthrography and CT arthrography are foveal lesions of the TFCC.
radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging