Levels of matrix metalloproteinase‐1 (MMP‐1), MMP‐2, MMP‐3, osteopontin, pentraxin‐3, and thymic stromal lymphopoietin in crevicular fluid samples from peri‐implantitis, periodontitis, and healthy sites
Leif Jansson,Anna Lundmark,Carolina Modin,Anders Gustafsson,Tülay Yucel‐Lindberg
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jre.13338
2024-09-28
Journal of Periodontal Research
Abstract:Elevated levels of MMP‐1, MMP‐2, MMP‐3, OPN, and TSLP were detected at sites affected by periodontitis and peri‐implantitis compared to sites with healthy teeth and implants. The cytokine OPN may serve as a biomarker for periodontitis, whereas the proteolytic enzyme MMP‐2 and the cytokine TSLP might be potential biomarkers for both periodontitis and peri‐implantitis. Aim Periodontitis and peri‐implantitis are chronic inflammatory diseases characterized by the destruction of supporting tissues. Despite some similarities, it is essential to understand the differences in how these diseases elicit unique host responses within the oral tissues, including the production of selected matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) and inflammatory mediators involved in tissue remodelling. The aim of this study was to evaluate the levels of proteolytic enzymes MMP‐1, MMP‐2, MMP‐3, as well as the inflammatory mediators osteopontin (OPN), pentraxin‐3 (PTX3), and thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP) in crevicular fluid samples collected from healthy, periodontitis‐affected, and peri‐implantitis sites. Methods Gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) and peri‐implant crevicular fluid (PICF) samples were collected from healthy and diseased teeth and implant sites of 163 patients. The MMP‐1, MMP‐2, MMP‐3, OPN, PTX3, and TSLP levels were determined using commercially available immunoassays. A linear mixed model procedure was adopted for multilevel analyses, using biomarker levels as the outcome variable to compare two types of sites. The diagnostic accuracy of the biomarkers was evaluated by Youden's index to estimate the sensitivity, specificity and the area under curve (AUC). Results The levels of MMP‐1, MMP‐2, MMP‐3, OPN, and TSLP were higher at sites with periodontitis and peri‐implantitis compared to the levels at sites with healthy teeth and healthy implants. No significant differences were observed in the levels of the measured markers between the sites diagnosed with periodontitis and those diagnosed with peri‐implantitis. The highest diagnostic potential at implant sites was found for MMP‐2 (AUC = 0.74) and TSLP (AUC = 0.72). The highest AUC (0.82) at tooth sites was found for OPN. Conclusions The findings indicate that the proteolytic enzyme MMP‐2 and the cytokine TSLP might be potential biomarkers for both periodontitis and peri‐implantitis, whereas the proinflammatory cytokine OPN may serve as a biomarker for periodontitis. Further studies are required to confirm the utility of these biomarkers and explore their potential clinical applications.
dentistry, oral surgery & medicine