Abstract:Abstract Background:Invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) is the second most common histology of breast cancer, accounting for approximately 10-15% of cases. Prior studies have demonstrated that loss of E-cadherin, as well as alterations in tissue including CDH1, FOXA1, TBX3 and PTEN loss, that were more commonly observed in Luminal A ILC, while GATA3 was more commonly observed in invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) (Ciriello et al., Cell 2015). However, data regarding the characterization of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in patients (pts) with metastatic ILC are limited. We hypothesized that there would be distinct mutational profiles between pts with metastatic ILC and IDC that could be characterized using ctDNA. Methods:This retrospective cohort study included de-identified clinical, pathological, and ctDNA data from pts with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) combined under a data use agreement and approved by the institutional review boards of three sites: Washington University in St. Louis (MO), Northwestern University (Chicago, IL), and Massachusetts General Hospital (Boston, MA). All pts included in the study had ctDNA testing per standard of care with plasma-based genotyping performed by Guardant360 (Redwood City, CA) between 2015-2020. Histological classification (ILC vs. IDC) was defined based on review of pathology reports from the primary tumor or from breast biopsies of de novo MBC, and additional clinical and pathological variables were obtained via electronic medical record review. Single nucleotide variants (SNVs) were annotated using OncoKB and ClinVar and only pathogenic variants were included. Mutational profiles were compared across histologic subtypes using Fisher’s exact test to assess differences in alteration frequency across subtypes. Multivariable analysis was performed. Results:A total of 994 pts with MBC underwent ctDNA testing and were included in the analysis. 10.7% of pts had ILC (N=106) and 89.3% had IDC (N=888). 89.4% of ILC cases were categorized as hormone-receptor positive (HR+) compared with 67.1% of IDC cases. Pts with ILC had a lower frequency of triple-negative (6.7% vs. 17.7%) and HER2 positive (3.9% vs. 15.2%) breast cancer compared with IDC. Pts with ILC had a significantly higher number of pathogenic SNVs compared with IDC (mean 4.45 vs. 2.77; P=0.0037). In contrast, pts with ILC had a significantly lower number of copy number alterations as compared to pts with IDC (mean 0.40 vs. 1.03; P=0.0017). No differences were observed in mutant allele frequency between pts with ILC and IDC. The 5 most common alterations observed in pts with ILC were the following: PIK3CA, TP53, ESR1, ERBB2, and ARID1A. Alterations in AR, BRAF, CDH1, ERBB2, FGFR2, IDH2, KRAS, NF1, PIK3CA, SMAD4, and TERT were significantly higher in ILC than IDC (all P<0.05). In contrast, mutations in GATA3, and amplifications in ERBB2 and MYC were significantly more common in pts with IDC (all P<0.05). In multivariable analysis, mutations in BRAF, CDH1, ERBB2, IDH2, TERT remained significantly higher in ILC, while amplification of MYC was significantly higher in IDC (all P<0.05). After restricting the analysis to pts with HR+ HER2 negative MBC, the following genes were significant in multivariate analysis: CDH1 and ERBB2 for pts with ILC and MYC amplification for pts with IDC (all P<0.05). Discussion:In this large, multi-institutional dataset, pts with metastatic ILC were characterized by a significantly higher number of SNVs in ctDNA compared to pts with IDC, suggesting higher mutational burden. We report several alterations that were significantly different in ILC vs. IDC. These results demonstrate the ctDNA profile of pts with ILC, and future studies should explore serial plasma-based genotyping to track ILC evolution to develop targeted precision medicine based therapeutic approaches for this unique subset of pts with MBC. Citation Format: Andrew A Davis, Lorenzo Gerratana, Katherine Clifton, Marko Velimirovic, Whitney L Hensing, Ami N Shah, Paolo D’Amico, Carolina Reduzzi, Qiang Zhang, Charles S Dai, Elyssa N Denault, Nusayba A Bagegni, Mateusz Opyrchal, Foluso O Ademuyiwa, Ron Bose, William J Gradishar, Amir Behdad, Cynthia X Ma, Aditya Bardia, Massimo Cristofanilli. Circulating tumor DNA characterization of invasive lobular carcinoma in patients with metastatic breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD14-04.

Multi-omics analyses provide novel biological insights to distinguish lobular ductal types of invasive breast cancers

Immune Landscape of Invasive Ductal Carcinoma Tumor Microenvironment Identifies a Prognostic and Immunotherapeutically Relevant Gene Signature.

Abstract PO3-24-01: Mapping inter- and intra-tumor heterogeneity in Ductal Carcinoma in situ and invasive breast cancer using integrative multi-omic profiling

Multi-omic profiling of simultaneous ductal carcinoma in situ and invasive breast cancer

The multiomic tumor microenvironment landscape of invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast.

Abstract PD14-04: Circulating tumor DNA characterization of invasive lobular carcinoma in patients with metastatic breast cancer

Abstract 7037: Comprehensive molecular and immune profiling of triple negative invasive lobular carcinoma

Invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast: A special histological type compared with invasive ductal carcinoma

Evaluating Surgical Outcomes Between Estrogen Receptor Positive Invasive Lobular and Invasive Ductal Carcinoma of the Breast-A Propensity Matched Analysis

Comprehensive Molecular Portraits of Invasive Lobular Breast Cancer

Spatial molecular profiling of mixed invasive ductal and lobular breast cancers reveals heterogeneity in intrinsic molecular subtypes, oncogenic signatures, and mutations

Spatial molecular profiling of mixed invasive ductal-lobular breast cancers reveals heterogeneity in intrinsic molecular subtypes, oncogenic signatures, and mutations

Abstract 5066: Integrating spatial and single cell transcriptomics to identify and characterise biologically driven subgroups in invasive lobular carcinoma

Genomic and epigenomic basis of breast invasive lobular carcinomas lacking CDH1 genetic alterations

Clinical-pathological characteristics associated with multigene assay risk scores, and prognostic impact of multigene risk scores in patients with invasive lobular carcinoma.

Metastatic Profiles and Survival Differences Between Infiltrating Ductal Carcinoma and Infiltrating Lobular Carcinoma in Invasive Breast Cancer

Invasive lobular carcinoma with extracellular mucin production and HER-2 overexpression: a case report and further case studies

Treatment and survival differences between patients with invasive lobular carcinoma versus invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast

Mutations Matter: Unravelling the Genetic Blueprint of Invasive Lobular Carcinoma for Progression Insights and Treatment Strategies

Abstract PO5-06-14: Genomic Landscape and Clinical Outcomes of Triple-Negative Invasive Lobular Carcinoma

Mixed Invasive Ductal and Lobular Carcinoma Has Distinct Clinical Features and Predicts Worse Prognosis when Stratified by Estrogen Receptor Status.