Abstract:Background After stroke many patients remain with difficulties in using the upper limbs, balance, transfers, and walking. The Motor Assessment Scale (MAS) assess the movements needed to do those activities. Social restrictions to combat the Covid-19 pandemic have increased the telerehabilitation, but the remote assessment is also important for rural areas or geographic regions where neurorehabilitation specialists are scarce, and when patients have difficulties on transport to the clinic. Although the measurement properties of the MAS applied in person are established, the validity and reliability of the MAS applied via teleconsultation is unknown. Objectives To investigate the validity and reliability of the Motor Assessment Scale (MAS) when administered remotely by videoconference (Tele-MAS). Methods This is a study of investigation of measurement properties, following the recommendations of COSMIN, for validity and reliability of Tele-MAS. The sample was 18 participants with a diagnosis of stroke, Braztel-MMSE score ≥13 points and with internet access and mobile device. The order of the evaluations (remote or in person) was randomly defined. The application sequence of the MAS items was adapted to allow remote application in addition to verbal commands during the evaluation and a specific instruction manual for application by videoconference was developed. For assessment by videoconference (rater A and B) the participant was instructed to position the camera in a way that the therapist can observe from the ground to above the head. The raters are positioned similarly to the participant to demonstrate the items and score synchronously. The application in person takes place in the participant's house, by rater A. The three collections took place within a period of eight days, with an interval of 2 days. The validity between the in person and remote evaluation was analyzed by Pearson's correlation coefficient and the reliability between the remote and in person evaluation was analyzed using the Bland-Altman limits of agreement. The interrater reliability for the sum of the score of the items was analyzed by the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) with a confidence interval of 95% (95%CI). Data were analyzed using MedCalc software®. Results A strong positive correlation (r=0.96; 95%CI=0.90-0.99) was found between the MAS and Tele-MAS scores. The analysis of the Bland-Altman graph for the total MAS scores indicated that the mean difference between in person and remote scores was -0.6 points. The 95% limits of agreement are +6.5 and -7.6 points. Excellent interrater reliability (ICC≤0.94; 95%CI =0.84-0.98) of the total Tele-MAS score. Conclusion The preliminary results indicate that Tele-MAS should be considered as a valid measure and has interrater reliability. Implications MAS is widely used in clinical practice, however, the measurement properties of the remote version applied by videoconference were unknown. The results of the final study should present the validity and reliability of Tele-MAS to remotely assess post-stroke motor function through videoconference.

Self-reported use of the paretic lower extremity of people with stroke: A reliability and validity study of the Lower-Extremity Motor Activity Log (LE-MAL) - Brazil

Grade-4/5 motor activity log—Brazil for post-stroke individuals with a severely impaired upper limb: a validity, reliability and measurement error study

Identifying the content of the Lower Extremity Motor Activity Log based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health

Reliability and validity of remote Life Space Assessment: LSA in persons with chronic stroke

Polish Cultural Adaptation and Reliability of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment of Motor Performance and Sensory Assessment Scale in Stroke Patients

Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Face Validity of the Functional Mobility Assessment into Brazilian Portuguese

VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF THE MOTOR ASSESSMENT SCALE FOR REMOTE ASSESSMENT OF INDIVIDUALS AFTER STROKE – PRELIMINARY RESULT

Brazilian version of the Hammersmith Functional Motor Scale Expanded: cross-cultural adaptation and validation

Concurrent validity and reliability of an activity monitoring for rehabilitation (AMoR) platform for step counting and sitting/lying time in post-stroke individuals

Interrater reliability of the Fugl-Meyer Motor assessment in stroke patients: a quality management project within the ESTREL study

Convergent construct validity of the Brazilian version of the Houghton scale

Preliminary Evaluation of the Clinimetrics of a Modified Lower Extremity Functional Scale in Older Adults After Total Knee Arthroplasty

Lower extremity physical function and quality of life in patients with stroke: a longitudinal cohort study

Assessing Participation in Stroke Survivors: Psychometric Properties of the Participation Measurement Scale (PM-Scale) Brazil

Measurement properties of the Brazilian-Portuguese version of the PROMIS-29 questionnaire and the Impact Score in patients with chronic low back pain

Translation and validation of the stroke self-efficacy questionnaire to a Portuguese version in stroke survivors

Hierarchical Properties and Functional Staging of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment Lower Extremity Scale

Development and validation of the Brazilian Portuguese version of the Cardiac Rehabilitation Barriers Scale

Parallel-forms Reliability and Minimal Detectable Change of the Four Telerehabilitation Version Mobility-related Function Scales in Stroke Survivors

Can the Lower Extremity Functional Scale Be Used in Children and Adolescents? A Validation Study

A semi-structured interview to capture manual wheelchair use for mobility activities among individuals with spinal cord injury in real-life situations: development and content validity of the Wheelchair Mobility Activity Log (WC-MAL)