Development of Microfluidic Impedance Flow Cytometry Enabling the Quantification of Intrinsic Single-Cell Bio-Dielectric Parameters Based on Constrictional Microchannel, Numerical Simulation, and Neural Network
Deyong Chen,Jian Chen,X. Qin,Xiao Chen,Xukun Huang,Junbo Wang,Huiwen Tan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2022.3226781
IF: 4.3
2023-01-15
IEEE Sensors Journal
Abstract:This study presents a microfluidic impedance flow cytometry enabling the quantification of intrinsic single-cell bio-dielectric parameters (e.g., cell radius of <inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">${R}_{\text {c}}$ </tex-math></inline-formula>, relative membrane permittivity of <inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\varepsilon _{\text {mem}}$ </tex-math></inline-formula>, and cytoplasmic conductivity of <inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\sigma _{\text {cyto}}$ </tex-math></inline-formula>) based on constrictional microchannel, numerical simulation, and neural network. Numerical simulation of a traveling cell within constrictional microchannel was conducted to locate relationship between intrinsic bio-dielectric parameters of single cells with corresponding impedance profiles, functioning as “reference” cells for the feedforward neural network, producing fitting accuracies of 1.00 ± 0.00 of <inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">${R}_{\text {c}}$ </tex-math></inline-formula>, 1.00 ± 0.00 of <inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\varepsilon _{\text {mem}}$ </tex-math></inline-formula>, and 1.00 ± 0.01 of <inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\sigma _{\text {cyto}}$ </tex-math></inline-formula>. Then, the fitted analytical equation based on numerical simulation and neural network was further used to translate measured impedance profiles into intrinsic bio-dielectric parameters of single cells, where <inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">${R}_{\text {c}}$ </tex-math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\varepsilon _{\text {mem}}$ </tex-math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\sigma _{\text {cyto}}$ </tex-math></inline-formula> were quantified as 7.6 ± <inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$0.8 \mu \text{m}$ </tex-math></inline-formula>, 16.73 ± 2.97, and 1.38 ± 0.34 S/m of K562 cells (<inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">${n}_{\text {cell}}=1284$ </tex-math></inline-formula>), 6.4 ± <inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$0.8 \mu \text{m}$ </tex-math></inline-formula>, 17.47 ± 5.09, and 1.46 ± 0.47 S/m of Jurkat cells (<inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">${n}_{\text {cell}}=2116$ </tex-math></inline-formula>), 5.9 ± <inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$0.7 \mu \text{m}$ </tex-math></inline-formula>, 17.40 ± 3.14, and 1.96 ± 0.81 S/m of HL-60 cells (<inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">${n}_{\text {cell}}=3543$ </tex-math></inline-formula>), respectively. Compared to phenomenal electrical signals (i.e., real and imaginary parts at specific frequency) detected by conventional electrical flow cytometry, which were prone to environmental variations, this microfluidic platform enabled the quantification of intrinsic bio-dielectric parameters of single cells and thus provides an effective tool in the field of flow cytometry.
Engineering,Computer Science