Physical and practical constraints on atmospheric methane removal technologies

Luisa Pennacchio,Marie Kathrine Mikkelsen,Morten Krogsbøll,Maarten M J W van Herpen,Matthew Johnson
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ad7041
IF: 6.7
2024-08-18
Environmental Research Letters
Abstract:Despite their apparent utility in mitigating climate change, technologies for removing methane from air are in early stages of development. Here we evaluate the limiting physical constraints, for three types of systems: twoand three-dimensional infrastructure and atmospheric oxidation enhancement, focusing on removing low (x CH4 < 1000 ppm) and ambient (x CH4 < 2 ppm) methane from air. With the space velocities and removal efficiencies of current three-dimensional technologies, volumes of 7–350 km 3 are required to remove 1 Tg CH4 /yr. Two-dimensional solutions are limited by the transport rate of methane to a surface. If every molecule of methane that collides with the surface is removed, an area of 1130 km 2 is needed to remove 1 Tg CH4 /yr at ambient concentration. However, research shows that per-collision reaction probabilities are < 10 −8 requiring a surface area of 10 10 –10 15 km 2 . Finally, we examine atmospheric oxidation enhancement, where 4.8 Tg/yr of Cl · or 8.8 Tg/yr of OH · is required to remove 1 Tg CH4 /yr, with precursors such as Cl2 , H2O2 or O3 . However, limitations arise concerning multiple environmental impacts. We conclude that the physical and practical constraints are considerable, and identify the main barriers that must be addressed.
environmental sciences,meteorology & atmospheric sciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?