Abstract:Attention can be deployed among external sensory stimuli or internal working memory (WM) representations, and recent primate studies have revealed that these external and internal selections share a common neural basis in the prefrontal cortex (PFC). However, it remains to be elucidated how PFC implements these selections, especially in humans. The present study aimed to further investigate whether PFC responded differentially to the peripheral and central retrospective cues (retro-cues) that induced attention selection among WM representations. To achieve this, we combined magnetoencephalography (MEG, Experiment 1) and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS, Experiment 2) with an orientation-recall paradigm. Experiment 1 found that a peripheral retro-cue with 100% reliability had a greater benefit on WM performance than a central retro-cue, while this advantage of peripheral over central cues vanished when the cue reliability dropped to 50% (non-informative). MEG source analysis indicated that the 100% peripheral retro-cue elicited earlier (-125 ms) PFC responses than the central retro-cue (-275 ms). Meanwhile, Granger causality analysis showed that PFC had earlier (0-200 ms) top-down signals projecting to the superior parietal lobule (SPL) and the lateral occipital cortex (LOC) after the onset of peripheral retro-cues, while these top-down signals appeared later (300-500 ms) after the onset of central retro-cues. Importantly, PFC activity within this period of 300-500 ms correlated with the peripheral advantage in behavior. Moreover, Experiment 2 applied TMS at different time points to test the causal influence of brain activity on behavior and found that stimulating PFC at 100 ms abolished the behavioral benefit of the peripheral retro-cue, as well as its advantage over the central retro-cue. Taken together, our results suggested that the advantage of peripheral over central retro-cues in the mnemonic domain is realized through faster topdown control from PFC, which challenged traditional opinions that the top-down control of attention on WM required at least 300 ms to appear. The present study highlighted that in addition to the causal role of PFC in attention selection of WM representations, timing was critical as well and faster was better.

Selective contributions of executive function ability to the P3

Individual Differences in Working Memory Capacity Are Reflected in Different ERP and EEG Patterns to Task Difficulty

Dissociated roles of the parietal and frontal cortices in the scope and control of attention during visual working memory.

Asymmetric Interaction Effects of Information with Varying Priorities in Visual Working Memory

Understanding the PD and the N2pc: Modeling the Neural Mechanisms Underlying Spatial Attention Shifts

Individual Differences in Working Memory and the N2pc

Early Auditory Evoked Potential Is Modulated by Selective Attention and Related to Individual Differences in Visual Working Memory Capacity

Correlativity of P300 Event-Related Potentials and Neuropsychological Tests

Overlapping neural representations for selection in attention and working memory

Visual Selective Attention P300 Source in Frontal-Parietal Lobe: ERP and fMRI Study

Functionally Independent Components of the Late Positive Event-Related Potential During Visual Spatial Attention

The Temporal Dynamics of Visual Working Memory Guidance of Selective Attention.

Working Memory Biases Early Object Discrimination and Parietal Activity During Attentional Selection

Early Top-Down Control of Internal Selection Induced by Retrospective Cues in Visual Working Memory: Advantage of Peripheral over Central Cues.

Working Memory Load-Dependent Spatio-Temporal Activity of Single-Trial P3 Response Detected with an Adaptive Wavelet Denoiser.

Working-memory capacity predicts the executive control of visual search among distractors: The influences of sustained and selective attention

Functional Dissociation of Latency-Variable, Stimulus- and Response-Locked Target P3 Sub-components in Task-Switching

The Competitive Influences of Perceptual Load and Working Memory Guidance on Selective Attention.

Memory Load Effects On The Executive Control: An Event-Related Potential Study

The Contribution of Bilateral Working Memory and Parietal Activation in Audiovisual Voluntary Spatial and Temporal Attention

Susceptibility to Attentional Capture by Target-Matching Distractors Predicts High Visual Working Memory Capacity